The assessment of work organization in lean production: the relevance of the worker’s perspective

Argues that the way work organization in lean production environments is assessed depends heavily on the choice of the variables that are adopted to ascertain the degree of innovation in the workplace. Many studies evaluate the change in work organization observing only those elements which are functional for the just‐in‐time production principles while excluding crucial dimensions that characterize the working situation from the worker’s perspective. Moreover, besides the choice of the variables employed to ascertain the degree of innovation in work organization, the method adopted for measuring these variables would seem to be critical if one wishes to bring to light what is hidden behind the popular terms like team, empowerment, problem‐solving groups, quality circles, etc. Suggests that only a research approach which is able to give “thick descriptions” of workplaces can reveal the “reality of working” within lean production systems.

[1]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  When it comes to “best practices” — Why do smart organizations occasionally do dumb things? , 1996 .

[2]  Tony Elger,et al.  Global Japanization?: The Transnational Transformation of the Labour Process , 1994 .

[3]  R. Kaufman,et al.  The Effects of Improshare on Productivity , 1992 .

[4]  Casey Ichniowski,et al.  The Effects of Human Resource Management Practices on Productivity , 1995 .

[5]  Adrian John Wilkinson,et al.  Bouquets, Brickbats and Blinkers: Total Quality Management and Employee Involvement in Practice , 1997 .

[6]  Barry Wilkinson,et al.  The Japanization of British Industry: New Developments in the 1990s , 1993 .

[7]  C. Geertz,et al.  The Interpretation of Cultures , 1973 .

[8]  Joel Cutcher-Gershenfeld,et al.  Japanese Team-Based Work Systems in North America: Explaining the Diversity , 1994 .

[9]  R. Delbridge.  Life on the line in contemporary manufacturing , 1998 .

[10]  G. Sewell,et al.  `Someone to Watch Over Me': Surveillance, Discipline and the Just-in-Time Labour Process , 1992 .

[11]  Jeffrey B. Arthur,et al.  Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover , 1994 .

[12]  Takahiro Fujimoto,et al.  Strategies for Assembly Automation in the Automobile Industry , 1997 .

[13]  A. Adcroft,et al.  Against lean production , 1992 .

[14]  D. Morgan,et al.  Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. , 1983 .

[15]  John B. Kidd,et al.  Toyota Production System , 1993 .

[16]  D. Wells,et al.  Choosing Sides: Unions and the Team Concept , 1988 .

[17]  Jos Benders,et al.  Team time: a model for developing self‐directed work teams , 1996 .

[18]  J. Johnson,et al.  Karoshi—Death from Overwork: Occupational Health Consequences of Japanese Production Management , 1997, International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation.

[19]  U. Jürgens.  Lean production in Japan: Mythos und Realität , 1993 .

[20]  R. Schonberger.  Japanese manufacturing techniques : nine hidden lessons simplicity , 1982 .

[21]  John Kelly,et al.  Scientific Management, Job Redesign, and Work Performance , 1983 .

[22]  Richard J. Schonberger,et al.  Human Resource Management Lessons from a Decade of Total Quality Management and Reengineering , 1994 .

[23]  David Stern,et al.  Becoming a High-Performance Work Organization: The Role of Security, Employee Involvement, and Training , 1992 .

[24]  John Paul Macduffie,et al.  The Adoption of High‐Involvement Work Practices , 1996 .

[25]  H. Kern,et al.  Das Ende der Arbeitsteilung? : Rationalisierung in der industriellen Produktion : Bestandsaufnahme, Trendbestimmung , 1986 .

[26]  M. Poole,et al.  Organizing Employment for High Performance: Theories, Evidence and Policy , 1997 .

[27]  Ben Dankbaar,et al.  Lean Production: Denial, Confirmation or Extension of Sociotechnical Systems Design? , 1997 .

[28]  Tomas Engström,et al.  Production Model Discourse and Experiences from the Swedish Automotive Industry , 1996 .

[29]  Robert Karasek,et al.  Job decision latitude and mental strain: Implications for job redesign , 1979 .

[30]  P. Osterman.  How Common is Workplace Transformation and Who Adopts it? , 1994 .

[31]  C. Berggren.  Lean Production—The End of History? , 1993 .

[32]  A. Bartel.  Productivity Gains from the Implementation of Employee Training Programs , 1991 .

[33]  Karel Williams.  A Fallen Idol? Japanese Management in the 1990s , 1996 .

[34]  John M. Jermier,et al.  Autonomy at Work , 2001 .

[35]  Richard Schonberger,et al.  World class manufacturing : the lessons of simplicity applied , 1986 .

[36]  R. Evered,et al.  Alternative Perspectives in the Organizational Sciences: “Inquiry from the Inside” and “Inquiry from the Outside” , 1981 .

[37]  S. Wood,et al.  CAN WE SPEAK OF A HIGH COMMITMENT MANAGEMENT ON THE SHOP FLOOR , 1995 .

[38]  Daniel T. Jones,et al.  The machine that changed the world : based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile , 1990 .

[39]  Barry Wilkinson,et al.  Pushing back the frontiers: management control and work intensification under JIT/TQM factory regimes , 1992 .

[40]  Jos Benders,et al.  Leaving Lean? Recent Changes in the Production Organization of some Japanese Car Plants , 1996 .

[41]  J. Klein.  A Reexamination of Autonomy in Light of New Manufacturing Practices , 1991 .

[42]  Christian Berggren.  Alternatives to Lean Production: Work Organization in the Swedish Auto Industry , 1993 .

[43]  Jack H. Knott,et al.  Are Training Subsidies for Firms Effective? The Michigan Experience , 1993 .

[44]  Giuseppe Volpato.  Il caso Fiat - Una strategia di riorganizzazione e di rilancio , 1996 .

[45]  U. Jürgens,et al.  Rolling Back Cycle Times: The Renaissance of the Classic Assembly Line in Final Assembly , 1997 .

[46]  Cipriano Forza,et al.  Work organization in lean production and traditional plants , 1996 .

[47]  Hirofumi Ueda,et al.  The Changing Nature of Japanese Production Systems in the 1990s and Issues for Labour Studies , 1996 .

[48]  R. Delbridge.  SURVIVING JIT: CONTROL AND RESISTANCE IN A JAPANESE TRANSPLANT , 1995 .

[49]  M. Kuhlmann,et al.  Patterns of Work Organization in the German Automobile Industry , 1997 .

[50]  Takahiro Fujimoto,et al.  Transforming Automobile Assembly , 1997 .

[51]  Paul Thompson,et al.  Redesigning production through teamworking: Case studies from the Volvo Truck Corporation , 1996 .

[52]  Thomas A. Kochan,et al.  What works at work : overview and assessment , 1996 .

[53]  Taiichi Ohno,et al.  Toyota Production System : Beyond Large-Scale Production , 1988 .

[54]  Tetsuo Abo,et al.  The Hybrid Factory: The Japanese Production System in the United States , 1995 .

[55]  John Paul Macduffie.  Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry , 1995 .