How and when do students use flashcards?

Previous survey research has documented students' use of self-regulated study strategies, with a particular interest in self-testing. These surveys indicate that students frequently use flashcards to self-test and that self-testing is primarily used as a way to monitor learning. Whereas previous surveys provide information about whether and why students self-test, they provide minimal information about how and when students choose to self-test. Accordingly, the primary purpose of the current survey was to explore how and when students engage in self-testing. We surveyed 374 undergraduates about the amount of practice and the timing of practice, two factors that strongly affect the efficacy of self-testing. Results indicate that students understand the benefits of practising to higher criterion levels (amount of practice) but do not typically implement or understand the benefits of practising with longer lags (timing of practice). We discuss practical implications for supporting more successful student learning.

[1]  Katherine A. Rawson,et al.  Testing the retrieval effort hypothesis: Does greater difficulty correctly recalling information lead to higher levels of memory? , 2009 .

[2]  J. McCabe Metacognitive awareness of learning strategies in undergraduates , 2011, Memory & cognition.

[3]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Expanding retrieval practice promotes short-term retention, but equally spaced retrieval enhances long-term retention. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practise retrieval when they study on their own? , 2009, Memory.

[5]  Katherine A Rawson,et al.  Why is test-restudy practice beneficial for memory? An evaluation of the mediator shift hypothesis. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Rereading Effects Depend on Time of Test. , 2005 .

[7]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Study strategies of college students: Are self-testing and scheduling related to achievement? , 2011, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[8]  D. Balota,et al.  Age-related differences in the impact of spacing, lag, and retention interval. , 1989, Psychology and aging.

[9]  Nate Kornell,et al.  Optimising self-regulated study: The benefits—and costs—of dropping flashcards , 2008, Memory.

[10]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  The promise and perils of self-regulated study , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  A. C. Butler,et al.  The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Optimizing schedules of retrieval practice for durable and efficient learning: how much is enough? , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[13]  Nate Kornell,et al.  Optimising Learning Using Flashcards: Spacing Is More Effective Than Cramming , 2009 .

[14]  Katherine A Rawson,et al.  Diagnosing Criterion-Level Effects on Memory , 2011, Psychological science.

[15]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Toward an understanding of students’ allocation of study time: Why do they decide to mass or space their practice? , 2010, Memory & cognition.

[16]  Katherine A. Rawson,et al.  Examining the efficiency of schedules of distributed retrieval practice , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[17]  Lisa K. Son,et al.  Learners’ choices and beliefs about self-testing , 2009, Memory.

[18]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Improving college students’ evaluation of text learning using idea-unit standards , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  Doug Rohrer,et al.  The effects of interleaved practice , 2010 .

[20]  Harry P. Bahrick,et al.  The importance of retrieval failures to long-term retention: A metacognitive explanation of the spacing effect , 2005 .

[21]  David A. Balota,et al.  Age-related differences in the impact of spacing, lag, and retention interval. , 1989 .

[22]  Harold Pashler,et al.  Is temporal spacing of tests helpful even when it inflates error rates? , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  The Critical Importance of Retrieval for Learning , 2008, Science.

[24]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Metacognitive control and strategy selection: deciding to practice retrieval during learning. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[25]  L. Carrier,et al.  College Students' Choices of Study Strategies , 2003, Perceptual and motor skills.

[26]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Accurate monitoring leads to effective control and greater learning of patient education materials. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[27]  Edward Vul,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Spacing Effects in Learning A Temporal Ridgeline of Optimal Retention , 2022 .

[28]  R. Bjork,et al.  Learning Concepts and Categories , 2008, Psychological science.

[29]  Karen Swan,et al.  Using standards to improve middle school students' accuracy at evaluating the quality of their recall. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[30]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Overconfidence produces underachievement: Inaccurate self evaluations undermine students’ learning and retention , 2012 .

[31]  Nate Kornell,et al.  Study efficacy and the region of proximal learning framework. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Spaced retrieval: absolute spacing enhances learning regardless of relative spacing. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.