Power-Force-Velocity Profiling of Sprinting Athletes: Methodological and Practical Considerations When Using Timing Gates.

Haugen, TA, Breitschädel, F, and Samozino, P. Power-force-velocity profiling of sprinting athletes: Methodological and practical considerations when using timing gates. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2018-The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of timing gate setup on mechanical outputs in sprinting athletes. Twenty-five male and female team sport athletes (mean ± SD: 23 ± 4 years, 185 ± 11 cm, 85 ± 13 kg) performed two 40-m sprints with maximal effort. Dual-beamed timing gates covered the entire running course with 5-m intervals. Maximal horizontal force (F0), theoretical maximal velocity (v0), maximal horizontal power (Pmax), force-velocity slope (SFV), maximal ratio of force (RFmax), and index of force application technique (DRF) were computed using a validated biomechanical model and based on 12 varying split time combinations, ranging from 3 to 8 timing checkpoints. When no timing gates were located after the 20-m mark, F0 was overestimated (mean difference, ±90% confidence level: 0.16, ±0.25 to 0.33, ±0.28 N·kg; possibly to likely; small), in turn affecting SFV and DRF by small to moderate effects. Timing setups covering only the first 15 m displayed lower v0 than setups covering the first 30-40 m of the sprints (0.21, ±0.34 to 0.25, ±0.34 m·s; likely; small). Moreover, poorer reliability values were observed for timing setups covering the first 15-20 m vs. the first 25-40 m of the sprints. In conclusion, the present findings showed that the entire acceleration phase should be covered by timing gates to ensure acceptably valid and reliable sprint mechanical outputs. However, only 3 timing checkpoints (i.e., 10, 20, and 30 m) are required to ensure valid and reliable outputs for team sport athletes.

[1]  J. Slawinski,et al.  How 100‐m event analyses improve our understanding of world‐class men's and women's sprint performance , 2017, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[2]  S. Dorel,et al.  A simple method for measuring power, force, velocity properties, and mechanical effectiveness in sprint running , 2016, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[3]  Martin Buchheit,et al.  Sprint Running Performance Monitoring: Methodological and Practical Considerations , 2016, Sports Medicine.

[4]  Pierre Samozino,et al.  Interpreting Power-Force-Velocity Profiles for Individualized and Specific Training. , 2016, International journal of sports physiology and performance.

[5]  E. Tønnessen,et al.  Sprint Conditioning of Junior Soccer Players: Effects of Training Intensity and Technique Supervision , 2015, PloS one.

[6]  E. Tønnessen,et al.  Sprint Time Differences Between Single- and Dual-Beam Timing Systems , 2014, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[7]  Koji Zushi,et al.  Association of Acceleration with Spatiotemporal Variables in Maximal Sprinting , 2014, International Journal of Sports Medicine.

[8]  Espen Tønnessen,et al.  Anaerobic performance testing of professional soccer players 1995-2010. , 2013, International journal of sports physiology and performance.

[9]  E. Tønnessen,et al.  Speed and countermovement-jump characteristics of elite female soccer players, 1995-2010. , 2012, International journal of sports physiology and performance.

[10]  N. Gill,et al.  Sources of variability in iso-inertial jump assessments. , 2010, International journal of sports physiology and performance.

[11]  A. Batterham,et al.  Spreadsheets for Analysis of Validity and Reliability , 2015 .

[12]  S. Marshall,et al.  Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. , 2009, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.