Impaired visual decision-making in individuals with amblyopia.

This study examined the effects of amblyopia on perceptual decision-making processes to determine the consequences of visual deprivation on the development of higher level cortical networks outside of the visual cortex. A variant of the Eriksen flanker task was used to measure response time and accuracy for decisions made in the presence of response-selection conflict. Performance of adults with amblyopia was compared to that of neurotypical participants of the same age. Additionally, simple and choice reaction time tasks presented in the visual and the auditory modality were used to control for factors such as feature visibility, crowding, and motor execution speed. A selective deficit in response time for visual decisions was found when individuals with amblyopia used either the amblyopic or non-amblyopic (dominant) eye, and this deficit was independent of visual acuity, motor time, and performance accuracy. In trial conditions that provoked response-selection conflict, responses were significantly delayed in amblyopic relative to neurotypical participants and were not subject to standard trial sequence effects. Our results indicate that, beyond the known effects of abnormal visual experience on visual cortex, suboptimal binocular input during a developmental critical period may also impact cortical connections to downstream areas of the brain, including parietal and frontal cortices, that are believed to underlie decision and response-selection processes.

[1]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[2]  A. Norcia,et al.  Contour integration deficits in anisometropic amblyopia. , 2001, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  J. Gold,et al.  The neural basis of decision making. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[4]  G. Rogers,et al.  Amblyopia: the normal eye is not normal. , 1990, Journal of pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus.

[5]  R. F. Hess,et al.  The threshold contrast sensitivity function in strabismic amblyopia: Evidence for a two type classification , 1977, Vision Research.

[6]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Undercounting features and missing features: evidence for a high-level deficit in strabismic amblyopia , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  A. Parker.  Binocular depth perception and the cerebral cortex , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[8]  Ariella V. Popple,et al.  The attentional blink in amblyopia. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[9]  I L Bailey,et al.  New Design Principles for Visual Acuity Letter Charts* , 1976, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[10]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Vernier acuity, crowding and amblyopia , 1985, Vision Research.

[11]  Paul V McGraw,et al.  Deficits to global motion processing in human amblyopia , 2003, Vision Research.

[12]  D. Hubel,et al.  Ferrier lecture - Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex , 1977, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[13]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Neural Activation During Response Competition , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[15]  David J. Field,et al.  Contour integration in strabismic amblyopia: The sufficiency of an explanation based on positional uncertainty , 1997, Vision Research.

[16]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Anterior Cingulate Conflict Monitoring and Adjustments in Control , 2004, Science.

[17]  W. Gehring,et al.  Functions of the Medial Frontal Cortex in the Processing of Conflict and Errors , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  J Anthony Movshon,et al.  The pattern of visual deficits in amblyopia. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[19]  D. Regan,et al.  Defective processing of motion-defined form in the fellow eye of patients with unilateral amblyopia. , 1992, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  L. Thibos,et al.  Contrast sensitivity in humans with abnormal visual experience. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  Peter J. Bex,et al.  The representation of global spatial structure in amblyopia , 2004, Vision Research.

[22]  D. Levi,et al.  On the effective number of tracked trajectories in amblyopic human vision. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[23]  B. Julesz.  Binocular depth perception of computer-generated patterns , 1960 .

[24]  D. Levi,et al.  The effect of flankers on three tasks in central, peripheral, and amblyopic vision. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[25]  E. Awh,et al.  Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  J. Gold,et al.  Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. , 2001, Psychological review.

[28]  T. Egner.  Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  W. Newsome,et al.  Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  D. Levi,et al.  The effect of similarity and duration on spatial interaction in peripheral vision. , 1994, Spatial vision.

[31]  R. A. Cline,et al.  Abnormal spatial selection and tracking in children with amblyopia , 2006, Vision Research.

[32]  S. Klein,et al.  Suppressive and facilitatory spatial interactions in amblyopic vision , 2002, Vision Research.

[33]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex , 1977 .

[34]  Susana T. L. Chung,et al.  The dependence of crowding on flanker complexity and target-flanker similarity. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[35]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Hyperacuity and amblyopia , 1982, Nature.

[36]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Attentional control adjustments in Eriksen and Stroop task performance can be independent of response conflict , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[37]  C. Carter,et al.  The anterior cingulate as a conflict monitor: fMRI and ERP studies , 2002, Physiology & Behavior.

[38]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The neural systems that mediate human perceptual decision making , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[39]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The neural basis of error detection: conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. , 2004, Psychological review.

[40]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  D. G. Green,et al.  Monocular versus Binocular Visual Acuity , 1965, Nature.

[42]  B. Mansouri,et al.  The extent of the dorsal extra-striate deficit in amblyopia , 2006, Vision Research.

[43]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. , 1998, Science.

[44]  E. Donchin,et al.  Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[45]  Ilona Kovács,et al.  A new test of contour integration deficits in patients with a history of disrupted binocular experience during visual development , 2000, Vision Research.

[46]  Catherine Boden,et al.  Deficient motion perception in the fellow eye of amblyopic children , 2005, Vision Research.