Estimating Evapotranspiration for Dryland Cropping Systems in the Semiarid Texas High Plains Using SWAT

The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) is one of the most widely used watershed models for simulating hydrology in response to agricultural management practices. However, limited studies have been performed to evaluate the SWAT model's ability to estimate daily and monthly evapotranspiration (ET) in semiarid regions. ET values were simulated using ArcSWAT 2012 for a lysimeter field managed under dryland conditions at the USDA-ARS Conservation and Production Research Laboratory at Bushland, Texas, and compared with measured lysimeter values from 2000 to 2010. Two scenarios were performed to compare SWAT's performance: (1) use of default plant leaf area index (LAI) values in the embedded plant database and (2) adjusted LAI values. Scenario 1 resulted in an “unsatisfactory” Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) of 0.42 and 0.38 for the calibration and validation periods, respectively. Scenario 2 resulted in a “satisfactory” NSE value for the calibration period while achieving a “good” NSE of 0.70 for the validation period. SWAT generally underestimated ET at both the daily and monthly levels. Overestimation during fallow years may be due to the limitations of the pothole function used to simulate furrow diking. Users should be aware of potential errors associated with using default LAI parameters. Inaccuracies in ET estimation may also stem from errors in the plant stress functions, particularly when evaluating water management practices for dryland watersheds.

[1]  Prasanna H. Gowda,et al.  ADAPT: Model Use, Calibration, and Validation , 2012 .

[2]  Modelling the impact of extensive irrigation on the groundwater resources , 2014 .

[3]  N. Karakaya,et al.  Evaluating the impact of climate change on groundwater resources in a small Mediterranean watershed. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[4]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  APPLICATION OF SWAT FOR THE UPPER NORTH BOSQUE RIVER WATERSHED , 2000 .

[5]  Jairo Ernesto Castillo Hernández,et al.  Groundwater Levels in Northern Texas High Plains: Baseline for Existing Agricultural Management Practices , 2013 .

[6]  Terry A. Howell,et al.  Calibration and Scale Performance of Bushland Weighing Lysimeters , 1995 .

[7]  Indrajeet Chaubey,et al.  SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS, CALIBRATION, AND VALIDATIONS FOR A MULTISITE AND MULTIVARIABLE SWAT MODEL 1 , 2005 .

[8]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations , 2007 .

[9]  Kyle R. Douglas-Mankin,et al.  Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Hydrologic/Water Quality Model: Extended Capability and Wider Adoption , 2011 .

[10]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical Development, Applications, and Future Research Directions , 2007 .

[11]  Terry A. Howell,et al.  Design and Construction of Large Weighing Monolithic Lysimeters , 1988 .

[12]  John R. Williams,et al.  LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1 , 1998 .

[13]  J. Arnold,et al.  HYDROLOGICAL MODELING OF THE IROQUOIS RIVER WATERSHED USING HSPF AND SWAT 1 , 2005 .

[14]  B. Kronvang,et al.  Towards European harmonised procedures for quantification of nutrient losses from diffuse sources--the EUROHARP project. , 2009, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[15]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  Overview of the Bushland Evapotranspiration and Agricultural Remote sensing EXperiment 2008 (BEAREX08): A field experiment evaluating methods for quantifying ET at multiple scales ☆ , 2012 .

[16]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  SWAT: Model Use, Calibration, and Validation , 2012 .

[17]  D. Legates,et al.  Evaluating the use of “goodness‐of‐fit” Measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation , 1999 .

[18]  Terry A. Howell,et al.  Hydraulic Pulldown Procedure for Collecting Large Soil Monoliths , 1988 .

[19]  K. S. Copeland,et al.  Can weighing lysimeter ET represent surrounding field ET well enough to test flux station measurements of daily and sub-daily ET? , 2012 .

[20]  J. Arnold,et al.  VALIDATION OF THE SWAT MODEL ON A LARGE RWER BASIN WITH POINT AND NONPOINT SOURCES 1 , 2001 .

[21]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[22]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Applications of the SWAT Model Special Section: Overview and Insights. , 2014, Journal of environmental quality.

[23]  Peter Droogers,et al.  Calibration of a distributed hydrological model based on satellite evapotranspiration , 2008 .

[24]  Steven R. Evett,et al.  Post-Processing Techniques for Reducing Errors in Weighing Lysimeter Evapotranspiration (ET) Datasets , 2014 .

[25]  Paul D. Colaizzi,et al.  Modeling irrigation management strategies to maximize cotton lint yield and water use efficiency. , 2009 .

[26]  P. Gowda,et al.  Irrigation in the Texas High Plains: a brief history and potential reductions in demand , 2009 .

[27]  P. Tuppad,et al.  MODELING NUTRIENT RUNOFF YIELDS FROM COMBINED IN-FIELD CROP MANAGEMENT PRACTICES USING SWAT , 2010 .

[28]  Drainage Division,et al.  Criteria for Evaluation of Watershed Models , 1993 .