Readability of Pediatric Patient Education Materials

Written patient education materials are an important part of ambulatory pediatric practices. We evaluated the readability of 33 representative pediatric education materials using three common formulas: Fog, Fry, and SMOG. The majority of pamphlets had readabilities of grade nine or above. The need to use multiple readability formulas was also demonstrated. Although the three readability formulas were highly correlated, they were significantly different from each other when using a repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) design. In almost half, the readability estimates differed by at least two grade levels. In addition, a large intrapamphlet variability for some pamphlets suggests a need to focus more attention on the readability of multiple sections within a pamphlet, not only on the overall or average readability. We conclude that the readability levels of patient education materials continue to be too high.

[1]  C. Feied,et al.  Functional illiteracy among emergency department patients: a preliminary study. , 1993, Annals of emergency medicine.

[2]  C. Meade,et al.  Readability of American Cancer Society patient education literature. , 1992, Oncology nursing forum.

[3]  J. Aiman,et al.  Level of reading difficulty in The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologsts Patient Education pamphlets , 1989, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  C. Meade,et al.  Computerized readability analysis of written materials. , 1988, Computers in nursing.

[5]  R D Powers,et al.  Emergency department patient literacy and the readability of patient-directed materials. , 1988, Annals of emergency medicine.

[6]  Patient education materials: are they readable? , 1992, Oncology nursing forum.

[7]  A S Vivian,et al.  Readability of patient education materials. , 1980, Clinical therapeutics.

[8]  R W Moore,et al.  Readability of Self-Care Instructional Pamphlets for Diabetic Patients , 1981, Diabetes Care.

[9]  D C Spadaro,et al.  Assessing readability of patient information materials. , 1980, American journal of hospital pharmacy.

[10]  L. G. Doak,et al.  Patient comprehension profiles: recent findings and strategies. , 1980, Patient counselling and health education.

[11]  L. G. Doak,et al.  Teaching Patients With Low Literacy Skills , 1985 .

[12]  Meade Cd,et al.  Consent forms: how to determine and improve their readability. , 1992 .

[13]  N. Schutte,et al.  Readability of health warnings on alcohol and tobacco products. , 1992, American journal of public health.

[14]  E. J. Mayeaux,et al.  Reading ability in patients in substance misuse treatment centers. , 1993, The International journal of the addictions.

[15]  C. Meade,et al.  Patient literacy and the readability of smoking education literature. , 1989, American journal of public health.

[16]  K. Glanz,et al.  Readability and content analysis of print cholesterol education materials. , 1990, Patient education and counseling.

[17]  H. Schumacher,et al.  Comparison of literacy level of patients in a VA arthritis center with the reading level required by educational materials. , 1992, Arthritis care and research : the official journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association.

[18]  E. J. Mayeaux,et al.  Reading ability of parents compared with reading level of pediatric patient education materials. , 1994, Pediatrics.

[19]  T. Davis,et al.  The gap between patient reading comprehension and the readability of patient education materials. , 1990, The Journal of family practice.

[20]  Spadero Dc,et al.  Assessing readability of patient information materials , 1983 .

[21]  J. R. Kicklighter,et al.  Factors Influencing Diabetic Clients' Ability to Read and Comprehend Printed Diabetic Diet Material , 1993, The Diabetes educator.

[22]  Stephens St.  Patient education materials: are they readable? , 1992 .