Anthropology and the Educational ‘Trading Zone’

This article suggests that the notion of an educational ‘trading zone’ is an analytically helpful way of describing a space in which ideas about learning and teaching are shared within and between disciplines. Drawing on our knowledge of anthropology and the Humanities, we suggest three possible reasons for the limited development of such zones within academia in the UK and US. The first is the relatively low status of education as a discipline, and its perceived dependence on individualist theories of learning drawn from psychology. The second is that disciplinary pedagogies are often deeply embedded in academic identity and practice, making engaging with an educational ‘trading zone’ an epistemologically unfamiliar habit. A final, and more overtly political, reason is the strategic resistance of many faculty members to engaging with the new visions of teaching ‘professionalism’ offered by ‘faculty development’ and ‘training’ units within universities. We end by exploring whether the emerging debate around the ‘scholarship of teaching and learning’ might circumvent some of these barriers.

[1]  R. Shavelson,et al.  Scientific Research in Education , 2002 .

[2]  Ranald Macdonald,et al.  The Scholarship Of Academic Development , 2003 .

[3]  R. Tiberius.  2: A Brief History of Educational Development: Implications for Teachers and Developers , 2002 .

[4]  M. Larson.  The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis , 1977 .

[5]  M. Reynolds,et al.  Knowledge Base for the Beginning Teacher , 1989 .

[6]  J. Banner.  Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts: Charting the Future of Teaching the Past , 2003 .

[7]  S. Brint.  The future of the city of intellect : the changing American university , 2003 .

[8]  T. Fuller.  The Voice of Liberal Learning: Michael Oakeshott on Education , 1990 .

[9]  P. Hutchings,et al.  Opening Lines: Approaches to the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. , 2000 .

[10]  L. S. Schulman,et al.  THE CARNEGIE FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING. , 1940, Science.

[11]  Gary Lee Downey,et al.  Cyborgs & citadels : anthropological interventions in emerging sciences and technologies , 1997 .

[12]  Alan Jenkins,et al.  Reshaping Teaching in Higher Education : A Guide to Linking Teaching with Research , 2002 .

[13]  R. Merton.  The Normative Structure of Science , 1973 .

[14]  Alan Jenkins,et al.  Discipline‐based educational development , 1996 .

[15]  A. C. Haddon.  Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea , 1922, Nature.

[16]  Henry S. Pritchett,et al.  THE CARNEGIE FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING. , 1912, Science.

[17]  S. Delamont.  The Anomalous Beasts: Hooligans and the Sociology of Education , 2000 .

[18]  Mary Taylor Huber.  Balancing Acts: The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Academic Careers , 2004 .

[19]  D. Halpern,et al.  Applying the Science of Learning to the University and Beyond: Teaching for Long-Term Retention and Transfer , 2003 .

[20]  Ellen Jansen.  Improving student learning. Theory and practice- 10 years on , 2003 .

[21]  J. Biggs,et al.  Teaching For Quality Learning At University , 1999 .

[22]  F. Weil,et al.  In an Age of Experts: The Changing Role of Professionals in Politics and Public Life. , 1997 .

[23]  David Gosling.  What do UK educational development units do , 1996 .

[24]  R. Jaeger,et al.  Complementary Methods for Research in Education , 1988 .

[25]  P. Potter,et al.  UNIVERSITIES AND KNOWLEDGE:RESTRUCTURING THE CITY OF INTELLECT , 2004 .

[26]  J. Malcolm,et al.  Bridging Pedagogic Gaps: Conceptual discontinuities in higher education , 2001 .

[27]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[28]  Gerald Graff,et al.  Beyond the Culture Wars: How Teaching the Conflicts Can Revitalize American Education , 1992 .

[29]  Lee S. Shulman,et al.  Disciplines of Inquiry in Education: An Overview , 1981 .

[30]  L. Frank,et al.  Education and anthropology , 1955 .

[31]  Sherwyn P. Morreale,et al.  Disciplinary Styles in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning , 2023 .

[32]  Roger Lindsay,et al.  Reshaping Teaching in Higher Education: Linking Teaching with Research. Staff and Education and Development Series. , 2003 .

[33]  M. Walker.  Reconstructing professionalism in university teaching : teachers and learners in action , 2001 .

[34]  S. Colligan,et al.  Service-Learning and Anthropology. , 2004 .

[35]  L. Shulman,et al.  Teachers of Substance: Subject Matter Knowledge for Teaching , 2005 .

[36]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  Academic Discourse: Linguistic Misunderstanding and Professorial Power , 1993 .

[37]  Tom Schuller,et al.  The Future of Higher Education. , 1991 .

[38]  David Gosling,et al.  Educational development units in the UK - what are they doing five years on? , 2001 .

[39]  R. Merton,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1975, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.

[40]  E. Boyer.  Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate , 1990 .

[41]  H. Cravens,et al.  :An Elusive Science: The Troubling History of Education Research , 2003 .

[42]  K. Lewis.  Faculty development in the United States: A brief history , 1996 .

[43]  M. Taussig.  The Devil and Commodity Fetishism in South America , 1982 .