Optimizing Finite Element Models for Concrete Bridge Assessment With Proof Load Testing

Proof load testing of existing reinforced concrete bridges is becoming increasingly important as the current bridge stock is aging. In a proof load test, a load that corresponds to the factored live load is applied to a bridge structure, to directly demonstrate that a bridge fulfills the code requirements. To optimize the procedures used in proof load tests, it can be interesting to combine field testing and finite element modeling. Finite element models can for example be used to assess a tested structure after the test when the critical position could not be loaded. In this paper, the case of viaduct De Beek, a four-span reinforced concrete slab bridge, is studied. Upon assessment, it was found that the requirements for bending moment are not fulfilled for this structure. This viaduct was proof load tested in the end span. However, the middle spans are the critical spans of this structure. The initial assessment of this viaduct was carried out with increasingly refined linear finite element models. To further study the behavior of this bridge, a non-linear finite element model is used. The data from the field test (measured strains on the bottom of the concrete cross-section, as well as measured deflection profiles) are used to update the non-linear finite element model for the end span, and to improve the modeling and assessment of the critical middle spans of the structure. Similarly, an improved assessment based on a linear finite element model is carried out. The approaches shown for viaduct De Beek should be applied for other case studies before recommendations for practice can be formulated. Eventually, an optimized combination of field testing and finite element modeling will result in an approach that potentially reduces the cost of field testing.

[1]  Jian Li,et al.  Progressive finite element model calibration of a long-span suspension bridge based on ambient vibration and static measurements , 2010 .

[2]  David V. Jáuregui,et al.  Load Rating a Prestressed Concrete Double T-Beam Bridge without Plans by Field Testing , 2015 .

[3]  Paul Ziehl,et al.  On-Site Acoustic-Emission Monitoring for Assessment of a Prestressed Concrete Double-Tee-Beam Bridge without Plans , 2016 .

[4]  Andrzej S. Nowak,et al.  Proof Load Testing of Bridges , 1996 .

[5]  DA Dick Hordijk,et al.  Development of recommendations for proof load testing of reinforced concrete slab bridges , 2017 .

[6]  R J Heywood,et al.  RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PROOF LOAD TESTING IN AUSTRALIA , 1997 .

[7]  Ane de Boer,et al.  Recommendations for the Shear Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Slab Bridges from Experiments , 2013 .

[8]  Ane de Boer,et al.  Towards standardisation of proof load testing: pilot test on viaduct Zijlweg , 2018 .

[9]  David Collings,et al.  A review of arching and compressive membrane action in concrete bridges , 2016 .

[10]  Harry W. Shenton,et al.  Diagnostic and In-Service Testing of Transit Railway Bridge , 2001 .

[11]  Joan R. Casas,et al.  Diagnostic load testing and assessment of existing bridges: examples of application , 2014 .

[12]  Michael Havbro Faber,et al.  Proof load testing for bridge assessment and upgrading , 2000 .

[13]  Cor van der Veen,et al.  Pilot Proof-Load Test on Viaduct De Beek: Case Study , 2017 .

[14]  Michael G. Barker,et al.  Quantifying Field-Test Behavior for Rating Steel Girder Bridges , 2001 .

[15]  J. C. Walraven,et al.  Transverse load redistribution and effective shear width in reinforced concrete slabs , 2017 .

[16]  Gert Heshe,et al.  DS/ENV 1992-1-1 NAD. National Application Document for Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures, Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings , 1993 .

[17]  Andrzej S. Nowak,et al.  PROOF LOAD TESTING OF HIGHWAY BRIDGES , 1996 .

[18]  Mircea Grigoriu,et al.  Probabilistic Models for Proof Load Testing , 1984 .

[19]  C. S. Cai,et al.  UNDERSTANDING CAPACITY RATING OF BRIDGES FROM LOAD TESTS , 2003 .

[20]  L Frýba,et al.  Load tests and modal analysis of bridges , 2001 .

[21]  Cor van der Veen,et al.  Proof load testing of the viaduct De Beek , 2017 .

[22]  A. de Boer,et al.  Modelling of the proof load test on viaduct De Beek , 2018 .

[23]  Brian Brenner,et al.  Load Rating of a Fully Instrumented Bridge: Comparison of LRFR Approaches , 2016 .

[24]  Billie F. Spencer,et al.  Finite element model updating of structures using a hybrid optimization technique , 2005, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[25]  DA Dick Hordijk,et al.  State-of-the-art on load testing of concrete bridges , 2017 .

[26]  Gongkang Fu,et al.  Diagnostic Load Testing for Bridge Load Rating , 1997 .