The association between the length of first stage of labor, mode of delivery, and perinatal outcomes in women undergoing induction of labor.

OBJECTIVE To estimate the association between the lengths of the first stage of labor, mode of delivery, and perinatal outcomes in women undergoing labor induction. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study of singleton, term pregnancies with labor induction and delivered during the second stage. The length of the first stage was examined by 6-hour intervals as predictors of mode of delivery and perinatal morbidity using chi(2) test and multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS There were 3620 women who met study criteria. Compared with women with a first stage between 0-12 hours, women with longer first stages had a higher risk of cesarean delivery during the second stage, up to an adjusted odds ratio of 7.44 in those with a first stage > or =24 hours (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.43-16.1). Women with a first stage > or =24 hours also had higher odds of postpartum hemorrhage (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.16; 95% CI, 1.73-5.79), chorioamnionitis (aOR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.19-6.69), and neonatal admission to the intensive care nursery (aOR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.10-3.74). CONCLUSION In women who underwent induction of labor, even when a second stage of labor was reached, the risk for cesarean delivery and maternal morbidity remained increased when the length of the first stage was longer than 24 hours. However, in this clinical scenario, the frequency of cesarean delivery remains less than 50%. The decision for surgical intervention thus should not be based on the elapse of time alone.

[1]  J. Martin,et al.  Births: final data for 2004. , 2006, National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System.

[2]  E. S. van den Akker,et al.  Bishop Score and Risk of Cesarean Delivery After Induction of Labor in Nulliparous Women , 2005, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  L. Taylor,et al.  Trends in births at and beyond term: evidence of a change? , 1999, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[4]  G. Martens,et al.  Outcome after elective labor induction in nulliparous women: a matched cohort study. , 2002, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  W. Grobman,et al.  Factors associated with the length of the latent phase during labor induction. , 2007, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[6]  D. Rouse,et al.  The Association of Maternal Weight With Cesarean Risk, Labor Duration, and Cervical Dilation Rate During Labor Induction , 2004, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  J D Yeast,et al.  Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: A review of 7001 consecutive inductions. , 1999, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  J. Troendle,et al.  Labor Progression and Risk of Cesarean Delivery in Electively Induced Nulliparas , 2005, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  M. Boulvain,et al.  Risks of induction of labour in uncomplicated term pregnancies. , 2001, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[10]  E H BISHOP,et al.  Pelvic Scoring for Elective Induction , 1964, Obstetrics and gynecology.