An experimental analysis of satisficing in saving decisions

Abstract Uncertainty of one’s future is the essential problem of saving decisions. Unlike previous experimental studies, we capture this crucial uncertainty by a scenario-based satisficing approach. Decision makers first form aspirations for a few relevant scenarios, and then search for consumption plans guaranteeing these aspirations. Our aim is to investigate whether agents make satisficing choices and, if so, how satisficing relates to optimality. We find that satisficing allocations can be reached easily when aspirations are incentivized, although aspiration levels are rather far from what optimality suggests.

[1]  I. Erev,et al.  Simultaneous Over- and Underconfidence: The Role of Error in Judgment Processes. , 1994 .

[2]  Ben Greiner,et al.  An Online Recruitment System for Economic Experiments , 2004 .

[3]  J. Pemberton.  Modelling and measuring income uncertainty in life cycle models , 1997 .

[4]  Thomas Baumann,et al.  The Jena video laboratory for economic experiments , 2004 .

[5]  K. Wärneryd.  The Psychology of Saving , 1999 .

[6]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[7]  Werner Güth,et al.  On Intertemporal Allocation Behavior - A Selective Survey of Saving Experiments - , 1999 .

[8]  NONNEGATIVITY CONSTRAINTS AND INTRATEMPORAL UNCERTAINTY IN A MULTI-GOOD LIFE-CYCLE MODEL , 1995 .

[9]  Glenn W. Harrison,et al.  Expected utility theory and the experiments , 1994 .

[10]  A. Börsch-Supan,et al.  Household Savings in Germany , 2000 .

[11]  Amnon Rapoport,et al.  Consumer Search: Not Enough or Too Much? , 2001 .

[12]  Albert Ando,et al.  The "Life Cycle" Hypothesis of Saving: Aggregate Implications and Tests , 2007 .

[13]  Vital Anderhub,et al.  An experimental analysis of intertemporal allocation behavior , 2000 .

[14]  R. Hall.  Stochastic Implications of the Life Cycle-Permanent Income Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence , 1978, Journal of Political Economy.

[15]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review , 2002 .

[16]  U. Fischbacher.  z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments , 1999 .

[17]  W. Güth.  Satisficing in Portfolio Selection - Theoretical Aspects and Experimental Tests , 2007 .

[18]  Thomas Gilovich,et al.  Are Adjustments Insufficient? , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[19]  Stephan Meier,et al.  Overborrowing and undersaving: lessons and policy implications from research in behavioral economics , 2007 .

[20]  Alison King Chung Lo,et al.  Consumer Sequential Search: Not Enough or Too Much? , 2003 .

[21]  Glenn W. Harrison,et al.  Expected Utility Theory and the Experimentalists , 1994 .

[22]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .