Embedding a Neuro-Fuzzy Mode Choice Tool in Intelligent Agents

Increasing road traffic levels in urban areas require actions and policies to manage and control the number of road users. Travelers’ choices of transport modes, particularly private cars, that generate the main share of road traffic levels, depend on many factors, which include both personal preferences and level-of-service variables. Understanding how travelers choose transport modes according to the above factors is an important challenge in order to adopt the most suitable policies and facilitate a sustainable mobility. In the literature, behavioral models have been mainly proposed in order to both estimate mode choice percentages and capture travel behaviors by suitable estimation of some parameters associated to the above factors. However, behavior is complex in itself and the mechanisms underlying user behavior might be difficult to be captured by traditional models. In this paper, a neuro-fuzzy approach is proposed to extract mode choice decision rules by evaluating different sets of rules and different membership functions of the neuro-fuzzy model. Particularly, to determine which inputs are the most relevant in such decision process, fuzzy curves and surfaces have been considered in order to take into account nonlinear effects. The neuro-fuzzy model proposed in this paper has been thought to be embedded in an agent-based methodological framework where user agents – representing travelers – make travel choices based on the rules learnt by means of the neuro-fuzzy system.

[1]  Yaser E. Hawas Development and Calibration of Route Choice Utility Models: Neuro-Fuzzy Approach , 2004 .

[2]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  A theoretical analysis of the cross-nested logit model , 2006, Ann. Oper. Res..

[3]  Ch. Ravi Sekhar,et al.  Development of neuro‐fuzzy‐based multimodal mode choice model for commuter in Delhi , 2018, IET Intelligent Transport Systems.

[4]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Agent-Based Models in Transport Planning: Current State, Issues, and Expectations , 2020, ANT/EDI40.

[5]  W. Greene,et al.  Specification and estimation of the nested logit model: alternative normalisations , 2002 .

[6]  Barbara Lenz,et al.  New Mobility Concepts and Autonomous Driving: The Potential for Change , 2016 .

[7]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  A survey of defuzzification strategies , 2001, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[8]  C. Manski The structure of random utility models , 1977 .

[9]  Chuen-Tsai Sun,et al.  Neuro-fuzzy modeling and control , 1995, Proc. IEEE.

[10]  Navneet Walia,et al.  ANFIS: Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System- A Survey , 2015 .

[11]  Francesco Pinna,et al.  Urban Policies and Mobility Trends in Italian Smart Cities , 2017 .

[12]  Kalliopi Kravari,et al.  A Survey of Agent Platforms , 2015, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[13]  Diego López-de-Ipiña,et al.  MASSHA: An agent-based approach for human activity simulation in intelligent environments , 2017, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[14]  Dragan Pamučar,et al.  VEHICLE ROUTE SELECTION WITH AN ADAPTIVE NEURO FUZZY INFERENCE SYSTEM IN UNCERTAINTY CONDITIONS , 2018 .

[15]  Jacob Marschak,et al.  Stochastic models of choice behavior , 2007 .

[16]  Dervis Karaboga,et al.  Adaptive network based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) training approaches: a comprehensive survey , 2018, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[17]  Marc Gaudry The inverse power transformation logit and dogit mode choice models , 1981 .

[18]  Yinghua Lin,et al.  Nonlinear system input structure identification: two stage fuzzy curves and surfaces , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[19]  Adel W. Sadek,et al.  Toward More Effective Transportation Applications of Computational Intelligence Paradigms , 2003 .

[20]  Pierre Lemarinier,et al.  Agent Based Modelling and Simulation tools: A review of the state-of-art software , 2017, Comput. Sci. Rev..

[21]  S.K. Singh,et al.  Smart real-time traffic congestion estimation and clustering technique for urban vehicular roads , 2016, 2016 IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON).

[22]  Dávid Földes,et al.  Urban mobility scenarios until the 2030s , 2021 .

[23]  Guang Ren,et al.  Stability analysis and systematic design of Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy control systems , 2005, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[24]  Serge Guillaume,et al.  Designing fuzzy inference systems from data: An interpretability-oriented review , 2001, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[25]  Seiichi Kagaya,et al.  Development of Transport Mode Choice Model by Using Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System , 2006 .

[26]  Giuseppe M. L. Sarnè,et al.  Agents meet Traffic Simulation, Control and Management: A Review of Selected Recent Contributions , 2016, WOA.

[27]  C. Bhat Covariance heterogeneity in nested logit models: Econometric structure and application to intercity travel , 1997 .

[28]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Generalized random utility model , 2002, Math. Soc. Sci..

[29]  G. N. Pillai,et al.  Recent advances in neuro-fuzzy system: A survey , 2018, Knowl. Based Syst..

[30]  Constantinos Antoniou,et al.  Factors affecting modal choice in urban mobility , 2012, European Transport Research Review.

[31]  M. Postorino,et al.  Evaluation of O/D Trip Matrices by Traffic Counts in Transit Systems , 2004 .

[32]  Paulo Vitor de Campos Souza,et al.  Fuzzy neural networks and neuro-fuzzy networks: A review the main techniques and applications used in the literature , 2020, Appl. Soft Comput..

[33]  Robert LIN,et al.  NOTE ON FUZZY SETS , 2014 .

[34]  Johann Schrammel,et al.  From mobility patterns to behavioural change: leveraging travel behaviour and personality profiles to nudge for sustainable transportation , 2018, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems.

[35]  Kristen L Sanford Bernhardt,et al.  Agent-Based Modeling in Transportation , 2007 .

[36]  Ricardo Faria,et al.  Smart mobility: A survey , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Internet of Things for the Global Community (IoTGC).

[37]  George J. Klir,et al.  Fuzzy Sets, Fuzzy Logic, and Fuzzy Systems - Selected Papers by Lotfi A Zadeh , 1996, Advances in Fuzzy Systems - Applications and Theory.

[38]  Rj Allan,et al.  Survey of Agent Based Modelling and Simulation Tools , 2009 .

[39]  M. Trombetti,et al.  Evaluating the impact of “Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans” on urban background air quality , 2019, Journal of environmental management.

[40]  Michio Sugeno,et al.  An introductory survey of fuzzy control , 1985, Inf. Sci..

[41]  Giuseppe M. L. Sarnè,et al.  An Agent-based Simulator for Urban Air Mobility Scenarios , 2020, WOA.

[42]  Maria Nadia Postorino,et al.  Fixed Point Approaches to the Estimation of O/D Matrices Using Traffic Counts on Congested Networks , 2001, Transp. Sci..

[43]  Robert Babuska,et al.  Neuro-fuzzy methods for nonlinear system identification , 2003, Annu. Rev. Control..

[44]  L. Montero,et al.  Transport Analytics approaches to the Dynamic Origin- Destination Estimation Problem , 2020 .

[45]  Mario Versaci,et al.  A Neuro-Fuzzy Approach to Simulate the User Mode Choice Behaviour in a Travel Decision Framework , 2008 .

[46]  J. Pineda-Jaramillo A review of Machine Learning (ML) algorithms used for modeling travel mode choice , 2019, DYNA.

[47]  Mohammad Reza Nami,et al.  Multi-Agent Systems: A Survey , 2010, PDPTA.

[48]  Ali Ghaffari,et al.  Design of an improved fuzzy logic based model for prediction of car following behavior , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics.

[49]  Navid Khademi,et al.  Day-to-day travel time perception modeling using an adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) , 2016, EURO J. Transp. Logist..

[50]  Jakub Zawieska,et al.  Smart city as a tool for sustainable mobility and transport decarbonisation , 2018 .

[51]  Dirk Neumann,et al.  Intermodal Mobility , 2017, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[52]  Giuseppe M. L. Sarné,et al.  Reinventing Mobility Paradigms: Flying Car Scenarios and Challenges for Urban Mobility , 2020, Sustainability.

[53]  Ali Ghaffari,et al.  New fuzzy solution for determining anticipation and evaluation behavior during car-following maneuvers , 2018 .

[54]  F. Koppelman,et al.  Activity-Based Modeling of Travel Demand , 2003 .

[55]  M. Postorino A comparative analysis of different specifications of modal choice models in an urban area , 1993 .

[56]  Michael Keane,et al.  A Note on Identification in the Multinomial Probit Model , 1992 .

[57]  José M. N. Vieira,et al.  Neuro-Fuzzy Systems: A Survey , 2004 .

[58]  Eric Bonabeau,et al.  Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[59]  M. Postorino,et al.  Modelling User Mode Choices by an Ellipsoidal Fuzzy Approach , 2013 .

[60]  Anders Karlström,et al.  A link based network route choice model with unrestricted choice set , 2013 .

[61]  E. Cascetta,et al.  Dominance among alternatives in random utility models , 2009 .

[62]  Catarina Ribeiro,et al.  Life cycle assessment of a multi-material car component , 2007 .

[63]  Michael Patriksson,et al.  The Traffic Assignment Problem: Models and Methods , 2015 .

[64]  László T. Kóczy,et al.  An intelligent traffic congestion detection approach based on fuzzy inference system , 2021, 2021 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics (SACI).

[65]  D. Hensher,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .

[66]  Bart Kosko,et al.  Fuzzy Engineering , 1996 .

[67]  Marcel G. Dagenais,et al.  The dogit model , 1979 .

[68]  F. Koppelman,et al.  The generalized nested logit model , 2001 .

[69]  D. Cox,et al.  An Analysis of Transformations , 1964 .

[70]  P. Alam ‘G’ , 2021, Composites Engineering: An A–Z Guide.

[71]  Giuseppe M. L. Sarnè,et al.  A Study to Promote Car-Sharing by Adopting a Reputation System in a Multi-Agent Context , 2017, WOA.

[72]  Stefania Bandini,et al.  Agent Based Modeling and Simulation: An Informatics Perspective , 2009, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[73]  F. Richard Yu,et al.  A Survey of Machine Learning Techniques Applied to Software Defined Networking (SDN): Research Issues and Challenges , 2019, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[74]  M. N. Postorino,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process to Evaluate the Quality of Service in Transit Systems , 2006 .