Inequalities in the social use of the Internet of things: A capital and skills perspective

In this article, we set out to explain different types of social uses of the Internet of Things (IoT) using forms of capital and Internet skills. We argue that the IoT platform entices different manners of social communication that are easily overlooked when focusing on the novelty of smart “things.” How people use the IoT socially is crucial in trying to understand how people create, maintain, or absolve social relations in a networked society. We find inversed effects for social capital, income and education on private use, and on sharing IoT data with a partner. Sharing with acquaintances and strangers is predicted by cultural activities. Sharing IoT data with acquaintances can especially be attributed to social relations that escape the immediate household. We conclude that varying figurations of capital and Internet skills predict how the IoT is used socially.

[1]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS social support survey. , 1991, Social science & medicine.

[2]  Rebecca Eynon,et al.  Development and validation of the Internet Skills Scale (ISS) , 2016 .

[3]  Samer Salam,et al.  Internet of Things From Hype to Reality , 2017 .

[4]  Samer Salam,et al.  Internet of Things From Hype to Reality , 2017 .

[5]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[6]  M. Savage,et al.  EMERGING FORMS OF CULTURAL CAPITAL , 2010 .

[7]  Leslie Haddon,et al.  The Contribution of Domestication Research to In-Home Computing and Media Consumption , 2006, Inf. Soc..

[8]  T. Knijn,et al.  Parenting Support in the Dutch ‘Participation Society’ , 2015, Social Policy and Society.

[9]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Strong, Weak, and Latent Ties and the Impact of New Media , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[10]  N. Nie.  Sociability, Interpersonal Relations, and the Internet , 2001 .

[11]  Laura Robinson,et al.  Pierre Bourdieu: theorizing the digital , 2017 .

[12]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? , 1998, The American psychologist.

[13]  R. Dubos.  Social Capital: Theory and Research , 2017 .

[14]  Laura Robinson.  The identity curation game: digital inequality, identity work, and emotion management , 2017 .

[15]  XuLi,et al.  The Internet of Things--A survey of topics and trends , 2015 .

[16]  Leslie Haddon,et al.  Design and the domestication of information and communication technologies: technical change and everyday life , 1996 .

[17]  P. Bourdieu.  Forms of Capital , 2002 .

[18]  Danny Beusch.  Internet society: The Internet in everyday life. , 2006 .

[19]  Joshua C. Mandel,et al.  Driving Innovation in Health Systems through an Apps-Based Information Economy. , 2015, Cell systems.

[20]  P. Valkenburg,et al.  Social Consequences of the Internet for Adolescents , 2009 .

[21]  John J. Sviokla,et al.  Exploiting the virtual value chain , 1999 .

[22]  Omar Lizardo.  Pierre Bourdieu as a Post-cultural Theorist , 2011 .

[23]  Lina Zhou,et al.  Patients' Adoption of WSN-Based Smart Home Healthcare Systems: An Integrated Model of Facilitators and Barriers , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[24]  R. Putnam.  Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital , 1995, The City Reader.

[25]  Leopoldina Fortunati,et al.  Robotization and the domestic sphere , 2018, New Media Soc..

[26]  Aditya Kulkarni,et al.  Healthcare applications of the Internet of Things : A Review , 2014 .

[27]  How health risks prevention shapes collective identities: a micro-sociological approach , 2015 .

[28]  M. Huysman,et al.  How Does the Internet Affect Social Capital , 2004 .

[29]  B. Hogan.  The Presentation of Self in the Age of Social Media: Distinguishing Performances and Exhibitions Online , 2010 .

[30]  E. Hargittai,et al.  PREDICTORS AND CONSEQUENCES OF DIFFERENTIATED PRACTICES ON SOCIAL NETWORK SITES , 2010 .

[31]  Will Marler,et al.  Mobile phones and inequality: Findings, trends, and future directions , 2018, New Media Soc..

[32]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Facebook privacy settings: Who cares? , 2010, First Monday.

[33]  Dinuka Wijetunga,et al.  The Digital Divide Objectified in the Design: Use of the Mobile Telephone by Underprivileged Youth in Sri Lanka , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[34]  Elizabeth A. Necka,et al.  Loneliness and Social Internet Use: Pathways to Reconnection in a Digital World? , 2018, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[35]  K. Mossberger,et al.  Any Thing for Anyone? A New Digital Divide in Internet‐of‐Things Skills , 2018 .

[36]  Patti M. Valkenburg,et al.  Online Communication and Adolescent Well-Being: Testing the Stimulation Versus the Displacement Hypothesis , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[37]  Gerald L. Lohse,et al.  International Differences in Information Privacy Concerns: A Global Survey of Consumers , 2004, Inf. Soc..

[38]  Peter R. Chai,et al.  SoMe and Self Harm: The use of social media in depressed and suicidal youth , 2018, HICSS.

[39]  Anurag Agarwal,et al.  The Internet of Things—A survey of topics and trends , 2014, Information Systems Frontiers.

[40]  Lida Xu,et al.  The internet of things: a survey , 2014, Information Systems Frontiers.

[41]  Cheri A. Levinson,et al.  Compensatory internet use among individuals higher in social anxiety and its implications for well-being. , 2012, Personality and individual differences.

[42]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  New Strategies for Employment? Internet Skills and Online Privacy Practices during People's Job Search , 2013, IEEE Security & Privacy.

[43]  Yong Jin Park,et al.  My whole world’s in my palm! The second-level divide of teenagers’ mobile use and skill , 2015, New Media Soc..