Personality and Occupational Accidents: Bar Benders in Guangdong Province, Shenzhen, China

AbstractLimited research has been undertaken to explore how Chinese construction workers’ personality affects their safety behavior. Inappropriate behavior on-site can instigate serious accidents, injuries, or fatality as well as incur significant costs and loss of corporate reputation. To address this dearth within the extant literature, this paper uses Eysenck Personality Questionnaire to examine the complex relationship between the personality of Chinese construction workers (especially, bar benders) and occupational accidents. A significant relationship between personality, unsafe behaviors, and the extent of injury was identified. Using the results generated, a series of practical recommendations are proffered to reinforce behavioral safety training (and reduce accidents on-site), including suggestions for conducting training programs that can be tailored to construction workers with different personality traits.

[1]  Peter E.D. Love,et al.  Editorial: Construction accidents , 2012 .

[2]  Eddie W.L. Cheng,et al.  Exploring the perceived influence of safety management practices on project performance in the construction industry , 2012 .

[3]  N. Cavazza,et al.  The impact of safety training programs on workers’ psychosocial orientation and behaviour , 2010 .

[4]  Sheila Keegan,et al.  Qualitative Research: Good Decision Making through Understanding People, Cultures and Markets , 2009 .

[5]  Jill C. Bradley,et al.  Workplace safety: a meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[6]  Dongping Fang,et al.  Measuring Safety Climate of a Construction Company , 2009 .

[7]  Chia-Fen Chi,et al.  In-depth accident analysis of electrical fatalities in the construction industry , 2009 .

[8]  D. R. Kouabénan,et al.  Role of beliefs in accident and risk analysis and prevention , 2009 .

[9]  R. Dennis Cook,et al.  Introduction to Regression , 2008 .

[10]  Venkatesh Balasubramanian,et al.  Manual Bar Bending—An Occupational Hazard for Construction Workers in Developing Nations , 2007 .

[11]  D. Jackson,et al.  PERSONALITY MEASURES AS PREDICTORS OF JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYTIC REVIEW , 2006 .

[12]  R. Goffin,et al.  The use of personality measures in personnel selection: What does current research support? , 2006 .

[13]  Sharon Clarke,et al.  A meta‐analytic review of the Big Five personality factors and accident involvement in occupational and non‐occupational settings , 2005 .

[14]  Saixing Zeng,et al.  Identifying elements of poor construction safety management in China , 2004 .

[15]  Helen Lingard,et al.  Occupational health and safety in construction project management , 2004 .

[16]  Hokwon A. Cho,et al.  Introduction to Regression Analysis , 2004 .

[17]  S. Salminen.  Have young workers more injuries than older ones? An international literature review. , 2004, Journal of safety research.

[18]  Oi-ling Siu,et al.  Age differences in safety attitudes and safety performance in Hong Kong construction workers. , 2003, Journal of safety research.

[19]  J. Reason,et al.  Combating omission errors through task analysis and good reminders , 2002, Quality & safety in health care.

[20]  Tariq S. Abdelhamid,et al.  Identifying Root Causes of Construction Accidents , 2001 .

[21]  Cara C. Bauer,et al.  The five‐factor model and safety in the workplace: Investigating the relationships between personality and accident involvement , 2001 .

[22]  Julie Pallant,et al.  SPSS survival manual : a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows , 2001, Behaviour Change.

[23]  E. Scott Geller,et al.  Behavior-Based Intervention for Occupational Safety: Critical Impact of Social Comparison Feedback , 2000 .

[24]  T. Lajunen,et al.  Is the EPQ Lie Scale bidimensional? Validation study of the structure of the EPQ Lie Scale among Finnish and Turkish university students , 1999 .

[25]  C. Jackson,et al.  Interpreting the correlation between neuroticism and lie scale scores , 1998 .

[26]  Helen Lingard,et al.  Behavior-based safety management in Hong Kong's construction industry , 1997 .

[27]  Nabil Kartam,et al.  Integrating Safety and Health Performance into Construction CPM , 1997 .

[28]  R. Larsen,et al.  Extraversion, neuroticism, and susceptibility to positive and negative affect: A test of two theoretical models , 1997 .

[29]  Richard Lynn,et al.  National differences for thirty-seven nations in extraversion, neuroticism, psychoticism and economic, demographic and other correlates , 1995 .

[30]  G. Boyle.  Myers‐Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI): Some Psychometric Limitations , 1995 .

[31]  Michael W. Bridges,et al.  Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  W. Hofstee,et al.  Who should own the definition of personality? , 1994 .

[33]  L. Francis.  Is psychoticism really a dimension of personality fundamental to religiosity , 1992 .

[34]  R. Philipchalk,et al.  The development of an abbreviated form of the revised Eysenck personality questionnaire (EPQR-A) : its use among students in England, Canada, the U.S.A. and Australia , 1992 .

[35]  A. Anastasi.  Psychological testing, 6th ed. , 1988 .

[36]  A new Visual Aesthetic Sensitivity Test—IV. Cross-cultural comparisons between a Chinese sample from Singapore and an English sample , 1984 .

[37]  Sybil B. G. Eysenck,et al.  THE ASSESSMENT OF PERSONALITY FACTORS ACROSS 25 COUNTRIES , 1984 .

[38]  Frank P. McKenna,et al.  Accident proneness: A conceptual analysis , 1983 .

[39]  Myers,et al.  Gifts Differing: Understanding Personality Type , 1980 .

[40]  R. Loo.  Characteristics of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Lie Scale and of Extreme Lie Scorers. , 1980 .

[41]  W. Mischel.  Introduction to personality , 1971 .

[42]  H. W. Heinrich,et al.  Industrial Accident Prevention: a Scientific Approach , 1951 .