Quantitative methods for three-dimensional comparison and petrographic description of chondrites

X-ray computed tomography can be used to generate three-dimensional (3D) volumetric representations of chondritic meteorites. One of the challenges of using collected X-ray tomographic data is the extraction of useful data for 3D petrographic analysis or description. Here, I examine computer-aided quantitative 3D texture metrics that can be used for the classification of chondritic meteorites. These quantitative techniques are extremely useful for discriminating between chondritic materials, but yield little information on the 3D morphology of chondrite components. To investigate the morphology of chondrite minerals such as Fe(Ni) metal and related sulfides, the homology descriptors known as Betti numbers, are examined. Both methodologies are illustrated with theoretical discussion and examples. Betti numbers may be valuable for examining the nature of metal-silicate structural changes within chondrites with increasing degrees of metamorphism.

[1]  Daniel T. Britt,et al.  The density and porosity of meteorites from the Vatican collection , 1998 .

[2]  F. Peyrin,et al.  Connectivity Analysis in Very Large 3D Microtomographic Images , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[3]  R. Ketcham Three-dimensional grain fabric measurements using high-resolution X-ray computed tomography , 2005 .

[4]  E. Jarosewich,et al.  Chemical analyses of meteorites: A compilation of stony and iron meteorite analyses , 1990 .

[5]  N. Fujii,et al.  Shape Analysis of Fe-Ni Grains among Antarctic Ordinary Chondrites. , 1984 .

[6]  F. Wlotzka,et al.  Cr spinel and chromite as petrogenetic indicators in ordinary chondrites: Equilibration temperatures of petrologic types 3.7 to 6 , 2005 .

[7]  R.M. Haralick,et al.  Statistical and structural approaches to texture , 1979, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[8]  N. Fujii,et al.  Shape and Anisotropy of Fe-Ni Grains in Antarctic Chondrites. , 1983 .

[9]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[10]  Rhonda M. Stroud,et al.  Graves Nunataks 95209: A snapshot of metal segregation and core formation , 2006 .

[11]  Mark S. Robinson,et al.  Bulk density of ordinary chondrite meteorites and implications for asteroidal internal structure , 2000 .

[12]  Richard A. Ketcham,et al.  Computational methods for quantitative analysis of three-dimensional features in geological specimens , 2005 .

[13]  A Odgaard,et al.  Three-dimensional methods for quantification of cancellous bone architecture. , 1997, Bone.

[14]  Joseph I. Goldstein,et al.  A three‐dimensional study of metal grains in equilibrated, ordinary chondrites , 1983 .

[15]  Keisuke Ito,et al.  Shape of Fe-Ni grains and magnetic susceptibility anisotropy in Antarctic chondrites , 1983 .

[16]  Maria Petrou,et al.  Image processing - dealing with texture , 2020 .

[17]  Jacob D. Furst,et al.  CO-OCCURRENCE MATRICES FOR VOLUMETRIC DATA , 2004 .

[18]  Mark L. Rivers,et al.  Meteorite 3‐D synchrotron microtomography: Methods and applications , 2007 .

[19]  R. J. Wilson Analysis situs , 1985 .

[20]  Mark L. Rivers,et al.  Pore size distribution in an uncompacted equilibrated ordinary chondrite , 2008 .

[21]  J. M. Friedrich,et al.  Limit on the scale of impact-related metal/silicate segregation on L chondrite parent(s) , 2006 .