Explicit treatment of water molecules in data-driven protein-protein docking: the solvated HADDOCKing approach.

Water molecules are active components in, literally, every biochemical event, forming hydrogen bonds, filling cavities, and mediating interactions with other (bio)molecules. Therefore, solvent drastically affects the kinetics and thermodynamics of numerous cellular events, including protein-protein interactions. While docking techniques are becoming successful in predicting the three-dimensional structure of protein-protein complexes, they are still limited in accounting explicitly for water in the binding process. HADDOCK is one of the few programs so far that can explicitly deal with water molecules during docking. Its solvated docking protocol starts from hydrated molecules, and a fraction of the interfacial water is subsequently removed from the docked models in a biased Monte Carlo procedure. The Monte Carlo-based removal is based on interfacial amino acid-water contact propensities derived from a dataset of high-resolution crystal structures of protein-protein complexes. In this chapter, this solvated docking protocol is described and associated methodological aspects are illustrated through an application example. It is shown that, although docking results do not always improve when the solvated docking protocol is applied, scoring is improved and the positions of buried water molecules in an interface are correctly predicted. Therefore, by identifying important water molecules, solvated docking can aid the development of novel inhibitors of protein-protein complexes that might be better accommodated at an interface.

[1]  Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin,et al.  Building Macromolecular Assemblies by Information-driven Docking , 2010, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[2]  K S Wilson,et al.  Recognition of RNase Sa by the inhibitor barstar: structure of the complex at 1.7 A resolution. , 1998, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[3]  C. Dominguez,et al.  HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[4]  Alexandre M J J Bonvin,et al.  Strengths and weaknesses of data‐driven docking in critical assessment of prediction of interactions , 2010, Proteins.

[5]  Eric J. Sorin,et al.  How well can simulation predict protein folding kinetics and thermodynamics? , 2005, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[6]  P. Petrone,et al.  MHC-peptide binding is assisted by bound water molecules. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[8]  R. Varadarajan,et al.  Discrepancies between the NMR and X-ray structures of uncomplexed barstar: analysis suggests that packing densities of protein structures determined by NMR are unreliable. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[9]  Samir Kumar Pal,et al.  Dynamics of water in biological recognition. , 2004, Chemical reviews.

[10]  A. Bonvin,et al.  Nuclear magnetic resonance-based modeling and refinement of protein three-dimensional structures and their complexes. , 2008, Methods in molecular biology.

[11]  A. Bonvin,et al.  The HADDOCK web server for data-driven biomolecular docking , 2010, Nature Protocols.

[12]  Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin,et al.  Data-driven Docking: Using External Information to Spark the Biomolecular Rendez-vous , 2010 .

[13]  S. Wodak,et al.  Docking and scoring protein complexes: CAPRI 3rd Edition , 2007, Proteins.

[14]  B. Halle,et al.  Protein hydration dynamics in aqueous solution: a comparison of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor and ubiquitin by oxygen-17 spin relaxation dispersion. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Water mediation in protein folding and molecular recognition. , 2006, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[16]  K Wüthrich,et al.  Protein hydration in aqueous solution. , 1991, Science.

[17]  Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin,et al.  Solvated docking: introducing water into the modelling of biomolecular complexes , 2006, Bioinform..

[18]  Alexandre M J J Bonvin,et al.  HADDOCK versus HADDOCK: New features and performance of HADDOCK2.0 on the CAPRI targets , 2007, Proteins.

[19]  Alexandre M J J Bonvin,et al.  Data‐driven docking for the study of biomolecular complexes , 2005, The FEBS journal.

[20]  Pinak Chakrabarti,et al.  Hydration of protein–protein interfaces , 2005, Proteins.

[21]  Alexandre M J J Bonvin,et al.  Are scoring functions in protein-protein docking ready to predict interactomes? Clues from a novel binding affinity benchmark. , 2010, Journal of proteome research.

[22]  R. Bahadur,et al.  The interface of protein-protein complexes: Analysis of contacts and prediction of interactions , 2008, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[23]  Marc F Lensink,et al.  Docking and scoring protein interactions: CAPRI 2009 , 2010, Proteins.

[24]  Sheldon Park,et al.  Statistical and molecular dynamics studies of buried waters in globular proteins , 2005, Proteins.

[25]  H. Wolfson,et al.  A new, structurally nonredundant, diverse data set of protein–protein interfaces and its implications , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[26]  A. Fersht,et al.  Protein-protein recognition: crystal structural analysis of a barnase-barstar complex at 2.0-A resolution. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[27]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Identification of protein-protein interaction sites from docking energy landscapes. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  R. Hartley,et al.  Refinement and structural analysis of barnase at 1.5 A resolution. , 1999, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[29]  A Wlodawer,et al.  Determination of water structure around biomolecules using X-ray and neutron diffraction methods. , 1986, Methods in enzymology.

[30]  Maxim Totrov,et al.  Improving CAPRI predictions: Optimized desolvation for rigid‐body docking , 2005, Proteins.

[31]  Alexandre M J J Bonvin,et al.  How proteins get in touch: interface prediction in the study of biomolecular complexes. , 2008, Current protein & peptide science.

[32]  B. Halle Biomolecular cryocrystallography: structural changes during flash-cooling. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  R. Zhou Free energy landscape of protein folding in water: Explicit vs. implicit solvent , 2003, Proteins.

[34]  D. Baker,et al.  The structural and energetic basis for high selectivity in a high-affinity protein-protein interaction , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.