When Words Compete: Levels of Processing in Perception of Spoken Words

Current theories of spoken-word recognition posit two levels of representation and process: lexical and sublexical. By manipulating probabilistic phonotactics and similarity-neighborhood density, we attempted to determine if these two levels of representation have dissociable effects on processing. Whereas probabilistic phonotactics have been associated with facilitatory effects on recognition, increases in similarity-neighborhood density typically result in inhibitory effects on recognition arising from lexical competition. Our results demonstrated that when the lexical level is invoked using real words, competitive effects of neighborhood density are observed. However, when strong lexical effects are removed by the use of nonsense word stimuli, facilitatory effects of phonotactics emerge. These results are consistent with a two-level framework of process and representation embodied in certain current models of spoken-word recognition.

[1]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  English speakers' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns , 2000 .

[2]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model , 1998, Ear and hearing.

[3]  J. Sawusch,et al.  Lexical neighborhood effects in phonetic processing. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  D. Kemmerer,et al.  Phonotactics and Syllable Stress: Implications for the Processing of Spoken Nonsense Words , 1997, Language and speech.

[5]  D. Norris.  Shortlist: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition , 1994, Cognition.

[6]  W. Levelt,et al.  Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? , 1994, Cognition.

[7]  R. L. Trask,et al.  语音学和音系学词典 = A dictionary of phonetics and phonology , 1993 .

[8]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation. , 1987 .

[9]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Acoustic-phonetic representations in word recognition , 1987, Cognition.

[10]  L. Colombo.  Activation and inhibition with orthographically similar words. , 1986 .

[11]  P. Luce,et al.  A computational analysis of uniqueness points in auditory word recognition , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The TRACE model of speech perception , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The temporal structure of spoken language understanding , 1980, Cognition.

[14]  Donald J. Foss,et al.  Identifying the speech codes , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Monitoring sentence comprehension , 1979 .

[16]  T. Landauer,et al.  Structural differences between common and rare words: Failure of equivalence assumptions for theories of word recognition , 1973 .

[17]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .

[18]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .