Multimodal image-guided prostate fusion biopsy based on automatic deformable registration

PurposeTransrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided random prostate biopsy is, in spite of its low sensitivity, the gold standard for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. The recent advent of PET imaging using a novel dedicated radiotracer, $$^{68}\hbox {Ga}$$68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), combined with MRI provides improved pre-interventional identification of suspicious areas. This work proposes a multimodal fusion image-guided biopsy framework that combines PET-MRI images with TRUS, using automatic segmentation and registration, and offering real-time guidance.MethodsThe prostate TRUS images are automatically segmented with a Hough transform-based random forest approach. The registration is based on the Coherent Point Drift algorithm to align surfaces elastically and to propagate the deformation field calculated from thin-plate splines to the whole gland.ResultsThe method, which has minimal requirements and temporal overhead in the existing clinical workflow, is evaluated in terms of surface distance and landmark registration error with respect to the clinical ground truth. Evaluations on agar–gelatin phantoms and clinical data of 13 patients confirm the validity of this approach.ConclusionThe system is able to successfully map suspicious regions from PET/MRI to the interventional TRUS image.

[1]  Zeike A. Taylor,et al.  MR to ultrasound registration for image-guided prostate interventions , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[2]  Ambros J Beer,et al.  Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging with 68Gallium‐labeled ligand of prostate‐specific membrane antigen: Promising novel option in prostate cancer imaging? , 2014, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[3]  Andriy Myronenko,et al.  Point Set Registration: Coherent Point Drift , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[4]  Jun Dang,et al.  Development of an Anthropomorphic Breast Phantom for Combined PET, B-Mode Ultrasound and Elastographic Imaging , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[5]  Nassir Navab,et al.  An Open Source Multimodal Image-Guided Prostate Biopsy Framework , 2014, CLIP@MICCAI.

[6]  Leo Grady,et al.  Random Walks for Image Segmentation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[7]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  MRI-ultrasound registration for targeted prostate biopsy , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[8]  Leonard S Marks,et al.  Target detection: magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy. , 2014, Urologic oncology.

[9]  Jason H. Moore,et al.  Feature Selection using a Random Forests Classifier for the Integrated Analysis of Multiple Data Types , 2006, 2006 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Bioinformatics and Computational Biology.

[10]  I. Kaplan,et al.  Real time MRI-ultrasound image guided stereotactic prostate biopsy. , 2002, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[11]  Naira Muradyan,et al.  Prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging and prostate cancer detection: comparison of random and targeted biopsies. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[12]  Gábor,et al.  A spline-based non-linear diffeomorphism for multimodal prostate registration , 2017 .

[13]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Fusion of MRI to 3D TRUS for Mechanically-Assisted Targeted Prostate Biopsy: System Design and Initial Clinical Experience , 2011, Prostate Cancer Imaging.

[14]  Andras Lasso,et al.  PLUS: Open-Source Toolkit for Ultrasound-Guided Intervention Systems , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Sheng Xu,et al.  Closed-Loop Control in Fused MR-TRUS Image-Guided Prostate Biopsy , 2007, MICCAI.

[16]  E. Wilkinson Cancer Research UK , 2002 .

[17]  Mandy Eberhart,et al.  Decision Forests For Computer Vision And Medical Image Analysis , 2016 .

[18]  S. Umeyama,et al.  Least-Squares Estimation of Transformation Parameters Between Two Point Patterns , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[19]  Bastian Leibe,et al.  Efficient object detection and segmentation with a cascaded Hough Forest ISM , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops).

[20]  Stephan G. Nekolla,et al.  68Ga-PSMA PET/MR with multimodality image analysis for primary prostate cancer , 2015, Abdominal Imaging.

[21]  Shyam Natarajan,et al.  MRI–ultrasound fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsy , 2013, Current opinion in urology.

[22]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Prostate Segmentation: An Efficient Convex Optimization Approach With Axial Symmetry Using 3-D TRUS and MR Images , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[23]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Clinical application of a 3D ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy system. , 2011, Urologic oncology.

[24]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Left Ventricle Segmentation in Cardiac Ultrasound Using Hough-Forests With Implicit Shape and Appearance Priors , 2014, The MIDAS Journal.

[25]  Baba C. Vemuri,et al.  Robust Point Set Registration Using Gaussian Mixture Models , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[26]  Desire Sidibé,et al.  A survey of prostate segmentation methodologies in ultrasound, magnetic resonance and computed tomography images , 2012, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[27]  Anders Eriksson,et al.  On the Bijectivity of Thin-Plate Splines , 2005 .

[28]  Jocelyne Troccaz,et al.  MRI/TRUS data fusion for prostate brachytherapy. Preliminary results , 2004, Medical physics.

[29]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Imaging techniques for prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy , 2009, Nature Reviews Urology.

[30]  Dean C. Barratt,et al.  Fully automated prostate magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound fusion via a probabilistic registration metric , 2013, Medical Imaging.

[31]  Dan Sperling,et al.  MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Imaging , 2014 .