An analysis of collar function and the use of titanium in femoral prostheses.

The quest to avoid or forestall late mechanical failures (loosening, hardware breakage) in total hip arthroplasty has led to numerous femoral component design variations which have included alterations in component geometry and constituent material properties. An understanding of the mechanical effects of these designs is required to make a rational selection of components from among competing designs. The recent advent of titanium femoral components, particularly those incorporating a proximal medial collar, reflects a belief that the proximal medial femoral cortex plays an important role in preventing femoral component loosening. The actual function of the proximal medial femoral cortex in supporting the femoral component and the role of that support in relation to component loosening are, however, subjects of considerable debate. It is clear that the state of stress and strain in the proximal medial femoral cortex is strongly affected by the implantation of femoral component^.^^^^'^^'^''^-'^ It is also clear that this region of the femur commonly (as many as 70% of cases) resorbs

[1]  R. D. Wood,et al.  Stress analysis of human femur with implanted Charnley prosthesis. , 1977, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  R. Crowninshield,et al.  An analysis of femoral component stem design in total hip arthroplasty. , 1980, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  J. G. Andrews,et al.  A biomechanical investigation of the human hip. , 1978, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  R. D. Wood,et al.  Three dimensional stress analysis of the human femur. , 1977, Computers in biology and medicine.

[5]  D R Pedersen,et al.  A measurement of proximal femur strain with total hip arthroplasty. , 1980, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering.

[6]  T D Brown,et al.  The development of a computational stress analysis of the femoral head. Mapping tensile, compressive, and shear stress for the varus and valgus positions. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  David F. Williams,et al.  Titanium as a metal for implantation , 1977 .

[8]  G. Blacker,et al.  Changes in the upper femur after low friction arthroplasty. , 1978, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  R A Brand,et al.  The effect of femoral stem cross-sectional geometry on cement stresses in total hip reconstruction. , 1980, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  J O Galante,et al.  Failed femoral stems in total hip prostheses. A report of six cases. , 1975, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  H. Amstutz,et al.  "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. , 1979, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  An experimental analysis of the stresses at the surface of Charnley hip prostheses in different anatomical positions. , 1979, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  T. Freitag,et al.  Fracture characteristics of acrylic bone cements. II. Fatigue. , 1977, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research.

[14]  W H Harris,et al.  Proximal strain distribution in the loaded femur. An in vitro comparison of the distributions in the intact femur and after insertion of different hip-replacement femoral components. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  A L Yettram,et al.  Dependence of stem stress in total hip replacement on prosthesis and cement stiffness. , 1980, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[16]  J. Charnley,et al.  The nine and ten year results of the low-friction arthroplasty of the hip. , 1973, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.