The prognostic significance of quantitative signal-averaged variables relative to clinical variables, site of myocardial infarction, ejection fraction and ventricular premature beats: a prospective study.

A prospective study was undertaken of the prognostic significance of quantitative signal-averaged electrocardiographic (ECG) variables relative to clinical variables, site of myocardial infarction, left ventricular ejection fraction and characteristics of ventricular premature beats in 115 patients (mean age 62 +/- 12 years) studied 10 +/- 6 days after myocardial infarction. Signal-averaged variables included the root mean square voltage of the terminal 40 ms, the duration of the filtered signal-averaged QRS complex and low amplitude signals less than 40 microV determined at 25 and 40 Hz high pass filtering in all patients. Of the 115 patients, 51 (44%) had an abnormal signal-averaged ECG (one or more abnormal signal-averaged variables), 51 (44%) at 25 Hz and 48 (42%) at 40 Hz high pass filtering. A higher proportion of patients with an inferior wall infarction had an abnormal signal-averaged ECG as compared with patients with anterior wall infarction (58% versus 31%). Over a 14 +/- 8 month follow-up period 16 patients (14%) had an arrhythmic event. An abnormal signal-averaged ECG at 40 Hz high pass filtering had a higher sensitivity (81% versus 75%) and specificity (65% versus 61%) than at 25 Hz high pass filtering. The predictive value of the signal-averaged ECG was superior to that of the ejection fraction (40% versus 20%) in anterior wall myocardial infarction, whereas in patients with inferior wall infarction, the predictive values of the two tests were equivalent. The prognostic power of 27 clinical and noninvasive variables was determined with the Cox proportional hazards regression model.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[1]  J P Miller,et al.  The relationships among ventricular arrhythmias, left ventricular dysfunction, and mortality in the 2 years after myocardial infarction. , 1984, Circulation.

[2]  D. Cox.  Regression Models and Life-Tables , 1972 .

[3]  S L Winters,et al.  A new noninvasive index to predict sustained ventricular tachycardia and sudden death in the first year after myocardial infarction: based on signal-averaged electrocardiogram, radionuclide ejection fraction and Holter monitoring. , 1987, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  M. Simson.  Use of Signals in the Terminal QRS Complex to Identify Patients with Ventricular Tachycardia After Myocardial Infarction , 1981, Circulation.

[5]  M. Josephson,et al.  Identification of patients with ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction: signal-averaged electrocardiogram, Holter monitoring, and cardiac catheterization. , 1984, Circulation.

[6]  J. Machac,et al.  Relation of late potentials to ejection fraction and wall motion abnormalities in acute myocardial infarction. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  L. Cupples,et al.  Multiple testing of hypotheses in comparing two groups. , 1984, Annals of internal medicine.

[8]  P. Walter,et al.  Influence of left ventricular function on signal averaged late potentials in patients with coronary artery disease with and without ventricular tachycardia. , 1985, American heart journal.

[9]  D. Mortara,et al.  Body Surface Detection of Delayed Depolarizations in Patients with Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia and Left Ventricular Aneurysm , 1981, Circulation.

[10]  R Lazzara,et al.  Recording from the body surface of arrhythmogenic ventricular activity during the S-T segment. , 1978, The American journal of cardiology.

[11]  J A Gomes,et al.  Late Potentials and Arrhythmogenesis * , 1985, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[12]  S. Winters,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Signal Averaging of the Surface QRS Complex and Signal Averaging of Intracardiac and Epicardial Recordings in Patients with Ventricular Tachycardia , 1988, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[13]  L Seipel,et al.  Non-invasive detection of late potentials in man--a new marker for ventricular tachycardia. , 1981, European heart journal.

[14]  S L Winters,et al.  Optimal bandpass filters for time-domain analysis of the signal-averaged electrocardiogram. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  A H Harken,et al.  Relation between late potentials on the body surface and directly recorded fragmented electrograms in patients with ventricular tachycardia. , 1983, The American journal of cardiology.

[16]  P. Denes,et al.  Quantitative Analsis of the High‐frequency Components of the Terminal Portion of the Body Surface QRS in Normal Subjects and in Patients with Ventricular Tachycardia , 1983, Circulation.

[17]  N. Sammel,et al.  Late potentials detected after myocardial infarction: natural history and prognostic significance. , 1986, Circulation.

[18]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Some Statistical Methods Useful in Circulation Research , 1980, Circulation research.

[19]  R. W. Brower,et al.  Relative value of clinical variables, bicycle ergometry, rest radionuclide ventriculography and 24 hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring at discharge to predict 1 year survival after myocardial infarction. , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  J A Gomes,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the high-frequency components of the signal-averaged QRS complex in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a prospective study. , 1985, Circulation.

[21]  D L Ross,et al.  Prognostic significance of ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation induced at programmed stimulation and delayed potentials detected on the signal-averaged electrocardiograms of survivors of acute myocardial infarction. , 1986, Circulation.