Comparison of Weighted Decision Matrix, and Analytical Hierarchy Process for CAD Design of Reconfigurable Assembly Fixture

Abstract Reconfigurable assembly fixtures are major components of a reconfigurable assembly system. They are precision components which require an intensive design process due to their usage and interaction with other components in the assembly system. Concept selection is a time consuming activity in the engineering design process, because it involves decision making and consideration of multiple factors. A computer aided design approach of four concepts was developed for a reconfigurable assembly fixture, based on functional requirements, cost, and manufacturability. The weighted decision matrix and analytical hierarchy process was used to compare these concepts. The decision criteria and evaluation technique used during this concept selection process is novel thus calling for its application in design of engineering components. The results of the two methods are presented graphically and the variations in the results obtained are used to judge the suitable method among both processes for the optimal design.

[1]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Computing with Words in Decision support Systems: An overview on Models and Applications , 2010, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[2]  Marco Bertoni,et al.  Using 3D CAD Models for Value Visualization: An Approach with SIEMENS NX HD3D Visual Reporting , 2014 .

[3]  Philip Cash,et al.  Investigating design: A comparison of manifest and latent approaches , 2014 .

[4]  Marco Bertoni,et al.  Value‐Driven Design – A methodology to Link Expectations to Technical Requirements in the Extended Enterprise , 2013 .

[5]  Napsiah Ismail,et al.  Concurrent Decisions on Design Concept and Material Using Analytical Hierarchy Process at the Conceptual Design Stage , 2011, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[6]  Emad Abouel Nasr,et al.  Engineering Design and Rapid Prototyping , 2010 .

[7]  Paul C. Xirouchakis,et al.  Construction of a two-parameters fuzzy outranking relation from fuzzy evaluations , 2004, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[8]  Juite Wang,et al.  Improved engineering design concept selection using fuzzy sets , 2002, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[9]  Marco Bertoni,et al.  6.3.2 Value‐oriented concept selection in aero‐engine sub‐systems design: the EVOKE approach , 2013 .

[10]  A. Messac,et al.  Concept Selection Using s-Pareto Frontiers , 2003 .

[11]  Diyar Akay,et al.  Conceptual design evaluation using interval type-2 fuzzy information axiom , 2011, Comput. Ind..

[12]  Christopher A. Mattson,et al.  Pareto Frontier Based Concept Selection Under Uncertainty, with Visualization , 2005 .

[13]  Matti Hämäläinen,et al.  Comparison of Four Existing Concept Selection Methods , 2007 .

[14]  Gül E. Okudan,et al.  Concept selection methods - a literature review from 1980 to 2008 , 2008 .

[15]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Computing with words in decision making: foundations, trends and prospects , 2009, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak..

[16]  Alessandro Bertoni,et al.  Analyzing Product-Service Systems conceptual design: The effect of color-coded 3D representation , 2013 .

[17]  Julie S. Linsey,et al.  The effects of time and incubation on design concept generation , 2014 .