Perceptions of Popularity-Related Behaviors in the Cyber Context: Relations to Cyber Social Behaviors

Despite acknowledging that adolescents are active users of electronic technology, little is known about their perceptions concerning how such technologies might be used to promote their social standing among their peer group and whether these perceptions relate to their cyber social behaviors (i.e., cyber aggression perpetration, cyber prosocial behavior). To address this gap in the literature, the present study included 857 seventh graders (M age: 12.19; 50.8% female) from a large Midwestern city in the United States. They completed questionnaires on face-to-face social behaviors, cyber social behaviors, perceived popularity, social preference, and their perceptions of characteristics and activities related to the cyber context which might be used to promote popularity. Findings revealed four activities and characteristics used to improve adolescents’ social standing in the peer group, including antisocial behaviors, sociability, prosocial behaviors, and technology access. Using antisocial behaviors in the cyber context to promote popularity was related to cyber aggression perpetration, while controlling for gender, social preference, and perceived popularity. On the other hand, sociability and prosocial behaviors in the cyber context used to improve popularity as well as technology access were associated with cyber prosocial behavior. A call for additional research is made.

[1]  M. Prinstein,et al.  Forms and Functions of Adolescent Peer Aggression Associated With High Levels of Peer Status , 2003 .

[2]  Kathryn M. LaFontana,et al.  Children's perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: a multimethod assessment. , 2002, Developmental psychology.

[3]  Michelle F. Wright,et al.  The Association Between Cyber Victimization and Subsequent Cyber Aggression: The Moderating Effect of Peer Rejection , 2013, Journal of Youth and Adolescence.

[4]  Andrea Hopmeyer,et al.  Sociometric Popularity and Peer-Perceived Popularity , 1998 .

[5]  Beverley D. Cairns,et al.  What makes a girl (or a boy) popular (or unpopular)? African American children's perceptions and developmental differences. , 2006, Developmental psychology.

[6]  D. Goh,et al.  Cyberbullying Among Adolescents: The Role of Affective and Cognitive Empathy, and Gender , 2010, Child psychiatry and human development.

[7]  Donna Eder,et al.  The Cycle of Popularity: Interpersonal Relations among Female Adolescents. , 1985 .

[8]  Michelle F. Wright,et al.  Classification of online problematic situations in the context of youths’ development , 2014 .

[9]  A. Cillessen,et al.  From censure to reinforcement: developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. , 2004, Child development.

[10]  C. Spiel,et al.  Traditional Bullying and Cyberbullying Identification of Risk Groups for Adjustment Problems , 2009 .

[11]  Anna Ševčíková,et al.  Online harassment and cyberbullying in the Czech Republic: Comparison across age groups. , 2009 .

[12]  S. Bauman,et al.  Associations among bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide in high school students. , 2013, Journal of adolescence.

[13]  Michelle F. Wright Longitudinal Investigation of the Associations Between Adolescents’ Popularity and Cyber Social Behaviors , 2014 .

[14]  C. Schoffstall,et al.  Cyber Aggression: The Relation between Online Offenders and Offline Social Competence , 2011 .

[15]  N. Eisenberg,et al.  The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors. , 1987, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  K. Dodge,et al.  Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. , 1982 .

[17]  Michelle F. Wright,et al.  Chinese Adolescents’ Social Status Goals , 2014 .

[18]  P. Adler,et al.  Peer Power: Preadolescent Culture and Identity , 1998 .