Hindbrain signal processing in the lateral line system of the dwarf scorpionfish Scopeana papillosus

Recordings were made from primary afferent fibres and secondary projection neurones (crest cells) in the mechanosensory lateral line system of the dwarf scorpionfish. Crest cells were identified by antidromic stimulation from the contralateral midbrain. Differences between primary afferent fibre and crest cell response characteristics are indicative of signal processing by the neuronal circuitry of the medial octavolateralis nucleus. There are a number of differences between primary afferent fibres and crest cells. Primary afferents have relatively high levels of spontaneous activity (mean close to 40 impulses s-1) and many of them are strongly modulated by ventilation. By contrast, crest cells have a much lower rate of spontaneous activity that is not obviously modulated by ventilation. Primary afferents show a simple tonic response to a maintained stimulus, whereas crest cells show a variety of temporal response properties, but in general show a phasic/tonic response to the same prolonged stimulus. Afferents are most sensitive to frequencies of stimulation around 100 Hz; in contrast, crest cells show a strong suppression of activity at this frequency. Crest cells are most responsive around 50 Hz. These afferent/secondary comparisons show similarities with those reported for allied electrosensory and auditory pathways.

[1]  J. Montgomery,et al.  Lateral line function in an antarctic fish related to the signals produced by planktonic prey , 1988, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[2]  S Coombs,et al.  Form and function relationships in lateral line systems: comparative data from six species of Antarctic notothenioid fish. , 1994, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[3]  N A Schellart,et al.  Velocity- and acceleration-sensitive units in the trunk lateral line of the trout. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  S Coombs,et al.  Physiological characterization of lateral line function in the Antarctic fish Trematomus bernacchii. , 1992, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[5]  David Bodznick,et al.  HINDBRAIN CIRCUITRY MEDIATING COMMON MODE SUPPRESSION OF VENTILATORY REAFFERENCE IN THE ELECTROSENSORY SYSTEM OF THE LITTLE SKATE RAJA ERINACEA , 1993 .

[6]  John C. Montgomery,et al.  Noise cancellation in the electrosensory system of the thornback ray; common mode rejection of input produced by the animal's own ventilatory movement , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[7]  D. Bodznick,et al.  An adaptive filter that cancels self-induced noise in the electrosensory and lateral line mechanosensory systems of fish , 1994, Neuroscience Letters.

[8]  H. Bleckmann,et al.  Physiology of lateral-line mechanoreceptors in a teleost with highly branched, multiple lateral lines. , 1990, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[9]  Accepted September,et al.  Single unit activity in the peripheral lateral line system of the cichlid fish Sarotherodon niloticus L. , 1985 .

[10]  R. Conley Descending input from the vestibulolateral cerebellum suppresses electrosensory responses in the dorsal octavolateralis nucleus of the elasmobranch, Raja erinacea , 1995, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[11]  N. Schellart,et al.  Response properties of lateral line and auditory units in the medulla oblongata of the rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). , 1993 .

[12]  S Coombs,et al.  Fibers innervating different parts of the lateral line system of an Antarctic notothenioid, Trematomus bernacchii, have similar frequency responses, despite large variation in the peripheral morphology. , 1992, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[13]  R. Fay,et al.  Source level discrimination by the lateral line system of the mottled sculpin, Cottus bairdi. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  David Bodznick,et al.  SUPPRESSION OF COMMON MODE SIGNALS WITHIN THE ELECTROSENSORY SYSTEM OF THE LITTLE SKATE , 1992 .

[15]  J. Montgomery,et al.  Sensory Tuning of Lateral Line Receptors in Antarctic Fish to the Movements of Planktonic Prey , 1987, Science.

[16]  David Bodznick,et al.  Suppression of Ventilatory Reafference in the Elasmobranch Electrosensory System: Medullary Neuron Receptive Fields Support a Common Mode Ejection Mechanism , 1992 .

[17]  S Coombs,et al.  Function and evolution of superficial neuromasts in an Antarctic notothenioid fish. , 1994, Brain, behavior and evolution.