The influence of medium conductivity on electropermeabilization and survival of cells in vitro.

Electropermeabilization and cell death caused by the exposure to high voltage electric pulses depends on the parameters of pulses, as well as the composition of the extracellular medium. We studied the influence of extracellular conductivity on electropermeabilization and survival of cells in vitro. For this purpose, we used a physiological medium with a conductivity of 1.6 S/m and three artificial media with conductivities of 0.14, 0.005, and 0.001 S/m. Measurements of pH, osmolarity, and cell diameter were made to estimate possible side effects of the media on the cells. Our study shows that the percentage of surviving cells increases with the decreasing medium conductivity, while the percentage of electropermeabilized cells remains unaffected. Our results show that cell survival in experiments involving electropermeabilization can be improved by decreasing the medium conductivity. To provide an interpretation of experimental results, we have theoretically estimated the resting transmembrane voltage, the induced transmembrane voltage, the time constant of the voltage inducement, and heating of the cell suspension for each of the media used. These calculations imply that for accurate interpretation of experimental results, both the induced and the resting transmembrane voltage must be considered, taking into account the conductivity and the ionic composition of the extracellular medium.

[1]  D. E. Goldman.  POTENTIAL, IMPEDANCE, AND RECTIFICATION IN MEMBRANES , 1943, The Journal of general physiology.

[2]  Damijan Miklavčič,et al.  Time course of transmembrane voltage induced by time-varying electric fields—a method for theoretical analysis and its application , 1998 .

[3]  E. Neumann,et al.  Membrane electroporation and direct gene transfer , 1992 .

[4]  H. Schwan.  Electrical properties of tissue and cell suspensions. , 1957, Advances in biological and medical physics.

[5]  U. Zimmermann,et al.  Effect of medium conductivity and composition on the uptake of propidium iodide into electropermeabilized myeloma cells. , 1996, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[6]  J Teissié,et al.  Control by osmotic pressure of voltage-induced permeabilization and gene transfer in mammalian cells. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[7]  D. Chang,et al.  Guide to Electroporation and Electrofusion , 1991 .

[8]  Joseph D. Bronzino,et al.  The Biomedical Engineering Handbook , 1995 .

[9]  M. Okino,et al.  Effects of a high-voltage electrical impulse and an anticancer drug on in vivo growing tumors. , 1987, Japanese journal of cancer research : Gann.

[10]  J. L. Biedler,et al.  Cellular resistance to actinomycin D in Chinese hamster cells in vitro: cross-resistance, radioautographic, and cytogenetic studies. , 1970, Cancer research.

[11]  J Teissié,et al.  An experimental evaluation of the critical potential difference inducing cell membrane electropermeabilization. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[12]  D Miklavcic,et al.  Evaluation of cell membrane electropermeabilization by means of a nonpermeant cytotoxic agent. , 2000, BioTechniques.

[13]  Tadej Kotnik,et al.  Sensitivity of transmembrane voltage induced by applied electric fields—A theoretical analysis , 1997 .

[14]  R. Ian Freshney,et al.  Culture of Animal Cells , 1983 .

[15]  L. Loew,et al.  Analysis of the effect of medium and membrane conductance on the amplitude and kinetics of membrane potentials induced by externally applied electric fields. , 1989, Biophysical journal.

[16]  E. Neumann,et al.  Digression on membrane electroporation and electroporative delivery of drugs and genes. , 1998 .

[17]  M Cemazar,et al.  Improvement of combined modality therapy with cisplatin and radiation using electroporation of tumors. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  S Y Ho,et al.  Electroporation of cell membranes: a review. , 1996, Critical reviews in biotechnology.

[19]  W. Krassowska,et al.  Modeling electroporation in a single cell. I. Effects Of field strength and rest potential. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[20]  G. Saulis,et al.  Pore disappearance in a cell after electroporation: theoretical simulation and comparison with experiments. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[21]  E Neumann,et al.  Fundamentals of electroporative delivery of drugs and genes. , 1999, Bioelectrochemistry and bioenergetics.

[22]  M J Jaroszeski,et al.  Theory and in vivo application of electroporative gene delivery. , 2000, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[23]  H. Itoh,et al.  Time courses of cell electroporation as revealed by submicrosecond imaging of transmembrane potential. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[24]  E Neumann,et al.  Electric field mediated gene transfer. , 1982, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[25]  M. Berridge,et al.  Elementary [Ca2+]i signals generated by electroporation functionally mimic those evoked by hormonal stimulation , 1999, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[26]  M. Rols,et al.  Ionic-strength modulation of electrically induced permeabilization and associated fusion of mammalian cells. , 1989, European journal of biochemistry.

[27]  J Teissié,et al.  Control by electrical parameters of short- and long-term cell death resulting from electropermeabilization of Chinese hamster ovary cells. , 1995, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[28]  D. Miklavcic,et al.  Effective treatment of cutaneous and subcutaneous malignant tumours by electrochemotherapy. , 1998, British Journal of Cancer.

[29]  Gregor Serša,et al.  Electrochemotherapy with Bleomycin in the Treatment of Hypernephroma Metastasis: Case Report and Literature Review , 2000, Tumori.

[30]  D Miklavcic,et al.  Electrochemotherapy with cisplatin: the systemic antitumour effectiveness of cisplatin can be potentiated locally by the application of electric pulses in the treatment of malignant melanoma skin metastases , 2000, Melanoma research.