Opportunities for integration of biofuel gasifiers in natural-gas combined heat-and-power plants in district-heating systems

As political pressure to improve efficiency and reduce CO2-emissions increases, natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) combined heat-and-power (CHP) technology is an increasingly attractive option for district-heating systems. However, as CO2-emissions reduction targets become more ambitious, it is expected that there will be pressure to reduce CO2-emissions from such units well before they reach the end of their useful lifetime. One way to achieve this goal is to integrate a biofuel gasification unit at the plant site. After clean-up, the produced syngas can be co-fired in the CHP unit. This paper discusses the economic performance of this type of retrofit, with specific emphasis on the impact of the following parameters: (i) the original NGCC CHP plant's power-to-heat ratio; (ii) the size of the district-heating system's annual heat-energy demand; (iii) the fuel mix in the district-heating system; and (iv) the availability of low-cost waste-heat that can be delivered to the district-heating system. The economic performance of the retrofitted CHP unit is measured as the overall cost of electricity production (COE). COE is analysed for four different energy-market parameter sets (referred to as Scenarios), including fuel prices, costs associated with energy and climate change policy instruments, and market electricity prices. The results indicate that even relatively high costs associated with CO2 emissions are insufficient to motivate retrofitting an NGCC CHP unit with an integrated biofuel-gasification unit. To promote this type of retrofit, an additional premium value for electricity generated from renewable fuel sources is required (such as the Swedish REC renewable energy certificate system). An unexpected result of this study is that the required value of REC is essentially independent of the energy market scenario considered.

[1]  Simon Harvey,et al.  The role of policy instruments for promoting combined heat and power production with low CO2 emissions in district heating systems , 2005 .

[2]  Arnaldo Walter,et al.  Co-firing of natural gas and biomass gas in biomass integrated gasification/combined cycle systems. , 2003 .

[3]  F List,et al.  Department of Energy Technology. , 1988 .

[4]  André Faaij,et al.  Future prospects for production of methanol and hydrogen from biomass , 2002 .

[5]  Eva Ingeborg Elisabeth Andersson,et al.  Energieffektiv biobränsleförädling i skogsindustrin , 2003 .

[6]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Cogeneration: One way to use biomass efficiently , 1994 .

[7]  P. Capros,et al.  The Economic Effects of EU-Wide Industry-Level Emission Trading to Reduce Greenhouse Gases: Results from PRIMES Energy Systems Model , 2000 .

[8]  Arnaldo Walter,et al.  Techno-economic analysis of co-fired biomass integrated gasification/combined cycle systems with inclusion of economies of scale , 2003 .

[9]  G. Bond,et al.  Catalysis, science and technology , 1983 .

[10]  Thore Berntsson,et al.  Biofuel gasification combined heat and power—new implementation opportunities resulting from combined supply of process steam and district heating , 2004 .

[11]  Richard L. Ottinger,et al.  Compendium of Sustainable Energy Laws: Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Promotion of Cogeneration Based on a Useful Heat Demand in the Internal Energy Market , 2005 .

[12]  Simon Harvey Scenarios for evaluating energy efficiency measures in industrial energy systems , 2004 .

[13]  Anders Ådahl Process Industry Energy Projects in a Climate Change Conscious Economy , 2004 .