Biosensors for environmental applications

Abstract The high cost and slow turnaround times typically associated with the measurement of regulated pollutants clearly indicates a need for environmental screening and monitoring methods which are fast, portable, and cost-effective. To meet this need, a variety of field analytical methods have been introduced, a number of which are commercially available or under development. Because of their unique characteristics, however, technologies such as biosensors might be exploited to fill specific niche applications in the environmental monitoring area. Although the potential environmental market is large, there are a number of technical and commercial obstacles which must be addressed before biosensors or other field analytical technologies have a significant impact on environmental monitoring. Some of these obstacles include the large number of potential pollutants and broad range of their chemical classes; the broad range and complexity of environmental matrices; the variety of possible co-contaminants; the wide dynamic range of pollutant concentrations; lack of well-established data quality expectations by potential users; lack of sufficient markets for specific applications; and regulatory acceptance requirements. This paper will focus primarily on challenges and possible opportunities for the development of biosensors for environmental monitoring applications.

[1]  Ursula Bilitewski,et al.  Mass Production of Biosensors , 1993 .

[2]  Kim R. Rogers,et al.  Acetylcholinesterase fiber-optic biosensor for detection of anticholinesterases. , 1991 .

[3]  Nabil A. Anis,et al.  Reusable fiber optic immunosensor for rapid detection of imazethapyr herbicide , 1993 .

[4]  D R Walt,et al.  Chemical sensors based on controlled-release polymer systems , 1991, Science.

[5]  M. Mascini,et al.  Sensitive detection of pesticides using amperometric sensors based on cobalt phthalocyanine-modified composite electrodes and immobilized cholinesterases. , 1992, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[6]  C. L. Gerlach,et al.  Environmental biosensors : A status report , 1996 .

[7]  James Davis,et al.  Elements of biosensor construction , 1995 .

[8]  M L Dourson,et al.  The current use of studies on promoters and cocarcinogens in quantitative risk assessment. , 1983, Environmental health perspectives.

[9]  Richard B. Thompson,et al.  Enzyme-based fiber optic zinc biosensor , 1993 .

[10]  Kim R. Rogers,et al.  A fiber-optic immunosensor for detecting parathion , 1992 .

[11]  Robert Kalvoda,et al.  Electrochemical analysis for environmental control , 1990 .

[12]  K. Cammann Continuous pollution control by chemical sensors , 1992 .

[13]  Joseph Wang,et al.  Organic-phase enzymatic assays with ultramicroelectrodes , 1991 .

[14]  Takeo Yasuda,et al.  Ammonia electrode with immobilized nitrifying bacteria , 1980 .

[15]  G. Belfort,et al.  Construction and evaluation of a metal ion biosensor , 1993, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[16]  Akio Makishima,et al.  Preparation and Properties of Immobilized Mercuric Reductase in Porous Glass Carriers , 1992 .

[17]  T. Vo-Dinh,et al.  Antibody-Based Fiberoptics Biosensor for the Carcinogen Benzo(a)pyrene , 1987 .

[18]  A Mulchandani,et al.  Principles and applications of biosensors for bioprocess monitoring and control. , 1995, Critical reviews in biotechnology.

[19]  A. V. van Wezel,et al.  Narcosis due to environmental pollutants in aquatic organisms: residue-based toxicity, mechanisms, and membrane burdens. , 1995, Critical reviews in toxicology.