Regulatory focus and the family–work interface: The role of regulatory fit between cohabiting partners

The aim of the present study was to examine the impact of regulatory focus in goal pursuit and regulatory fit between marital partners on family conditions and the family–work interface. We hypothesized that when both partners are high on promotion focus (fit) they experience higher developmental possibilities at home and have an increased likelihood of family-to-work facilitation (FWF). In addition, we hypothesized that when both partners are prevention focused (fit) they experience less home demands and less family-to-work conflict (FWC). In total, 131 working couples participated in the study. Each partner provided information about his/her own regulatory focus, perceptions of home demands and home developmental possibilities, and experienced FWF and FWC. Results of moderated structural equation modelling analyses largely supported our hypotheses since the interaction between partners’ promotion focus predicted the levels of home developmental possibilities and FWF, whereas the interaction between partners’ prevention focus predicted home demands in the expected direction. In conclusion, the fit between partners’ self regulatory styles can influence family life and, consequently, the impact of family on work.

[1]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models , 2014 .

[2]  Russell E. Johnson,et al.  Regulatory focus and work-related outcomes: a review and meta-analysis. , 2012, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  Christoph Meinel,et al.  Interrelations between Motivation, Creativity and Emotions in Design Thinking Processes – An Empirical Study Based on Regulatory Focus Theory , 2011 .

[4]  C. Rusbult,et al.  Regulatory focus and the Michelangelo Phenomenon: How close partners promote one another's ideal selves ☆ , 2010 .

[5]  Liu-Qin Yang,et al.  Commitment and Motivation at Work: the Relevance of Employee Identity and Regulatory Focus , 2010 .

[6]  Eli J. Finkel,et al.  Motivations for promotion and prevention and the role of trust and commitment in interpersonal forgiveness , 2010 .

[7]  A. Bakker,et al.  Does home life interfere with or facilitate job performance? , 2010 .

[8]  Paul D. Johnson,et al.  An examination of the factorial, construct, and predictive validity and utility of the Regulatory Focus at Work Scale. , 2009 .

[9]  Regulatory focus systems and personal values , 2009 .

[10]  Paul W. Eastwick,et al.  Regulatory Focus and Romantic Alternatives , 2009 .

[11]  James M. LeBreton,et al.  Answers to 20 Questions About Interrater Reliability and Interrater Agreement , 2008 .

[12]  Evangelia Demerouti,et al.  How job demands affect partners' experience of exhaustion: integrating work-family conflict and crossover theory. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  Peter Salovey,et al.  A Field Experiment Testing the Utility of Regulatory Fit Messages for Promoting Physical Activity. , 2008, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[14]  Dawn S. Carlson,et al.  Supervisor Appraisal as the Link Between Family–Work Balance and Contextual Performance , 2008 .

[15]  J. Keller.  On the development of regulatory focus: the role of parenting styles , 2008 .

[16]  R. Cropanzano,et al.  How Regulatory Focus Impacts the Process-by-Outcome Interaction for Perceived Fairness and Emotions , 2008 .

[17]  Abigail A. Scholer,et al.  Regulatory Fit and Persuasion: Basic Principles and Remaining Questions , 2008 .

[18]  Thomas Bradbury,et al.  INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AND GROUP PROCESSES Similarity, Convergence, and Relationship Satisfaction in Dating and Married Couples , 2007 .

[19]  K. Sassenberg,et al.  The impact of regulatory focus on affective responses to social discrimination , 2007 .

[20]  Gilad Chen,et al.  A multilevel integration of personality, climate, self-regulation, and performance. , 2006 .

[21]  Kris Byron.  A meta-analytic review of work–family conflict and its antecedents ☆ , 2005 .

[22]  M. Kompier,et al.  Work-home interaction from a work psychological perspective: Development and validation of a new questionnaire, the SWING , 2005 .

[23]  E. Higgins,et al.  Value From Regulatory Fit , 2005 .

[24]  W. Casper,et al.  Work and family research in IO/OB: Content analysis and review of the literature (1980–2002) , 2005 .

[25]  Wilmar B. Schaufeli,et al.  Balancing Work and Home: How Job and Home Demands Are Related to Burnout , 2005 .

[26]  J. Gill.  Hierarchical Linear Models , 2005 .

[27]  E. Higgins,et al.  Regulatory fit and persuasion: transfer from "Feeling Right.". , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  M. Kompier,et al.  Positive and negative work‐home interaction: prevalence and correlates , 2004 .

[29]  E. Tory Higgins,et al.  How regulatory fit enhances motivational strength during goal pursuit , 2004 .

[30]  Jens Förster,et al.  Speed/accuracy decisions in task performance: Built-in trade-off or separate strategic concerns? , 2003 .

[31]  Christian H. Jordan,et al.  Motivation by positive or negative role models: regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  Theo F. Meijman,et al.  Specific relationships between psychosocial job conditions and job-related stress: A three-level analytic approach , 2002 .

[33]  Sabine A. E. Geurts,et al.  Work/nonwork interface: A review of theories and findings , 2002 .

[34]  W. Dunlap,et al.  Testing Interaction Effects in LISREL: Examination and Illustration of Available Procedures , 2001 .

[35]  Joel Brockner,et al.  Regulatory Focus Theory: Implications for the Study of Emotions at Work , 2001 .

[36]  E. Higgins,et al.  Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride , 2001 .

[37]  E. Higgins.  Making a good decision: value from fit. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[38]  Kevin E. Voss,et al.  A Comment on the Relationship between Coefficient Alpha and Scale Characteristics , 2000 .

[39]  J. Grzywacz,et al.  Demography , 1986, Prehistoric Fisherfolk of Oman: The Neolithic Village of Ras Al-Hamra RH-5.

[40]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[41]  E. Higgins.  Promotion and Prevention: Regulatory Focus as A Motivational Principle , 1998 .

[42]  E. Higgins,et al.  Performance incentives and means: how regulatory focus influences goal attainment. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  E. Higgins,et al.  Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations : Promotion and Prevention in Decision-Making , 1997 .

[44]  E. Higgins,et al.  Emotional responses to goal attainment: strength of regulatory focus as moderator. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[45]  E. Higgins,et al.  Expectancy x value effects: regulatory focus as determinant of magnitude and direction. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[46]  Murray D. Smith,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications , 1996 .

[47]  E. Higgins,et al.  Ideal versus ought predilections for approach and avoidance: distinct self-regulatory systems. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[48]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling With the Simplis Command Language , 1993 .

[49]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[50]  P. Karoly.  Mechanisms of Self-Regulation: A Systems View , 1993 .

[51]  J. S. Long,et al.  Tests for Structural Equation Models , 1992 .

[52]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[53]  J. Mathieu,et al.  Influences of Individual and Situational Characteristics on Measures of Training Effectiveness , 1992 .

[54]  S. Lobel,et al.  Allocation of Investment in Work and Family Roles: Alternative Theories and Implications for Research , 1991 .

[55]  H. Reis,et al.  Intimacy as an interpersonal process. , 1988 .

[56]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  Practical Issues in Structural Modeling , 1987 .

[57]  R. Sitgreaves.  Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). , 1979 .

[58]  George W. Bohrnstedt,et al.  The Reliability of Products of Two Random Variables , 1978 .

[59]  Rosabeth Moss Kanter,et al.  Work and Family in the United States: A Critical Review and Agenda for Research and Policy , 1978 .

[60]  J. Pleck.  The work-family role system. , 1977 .

[61]  D. Byrne.  The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .