Prey Exchange Rates and the Impact of Predators on Prey Populations in Streams

We present four lines of evidence that the magnitude of prey exchange (=immigration/emigration) among substrate patches has an overwhelming influence on the perceived effects of predators on prey populations. (1) An extensive review of the literature on predation effects in benthic and littoral freshwater revealed a significant relationship between prey exchange rate and observed predator impact. In streams, studies showing significant predator effects used cages with smaller mesh sizes than studies showing nonsignificant effects. Similarly, there was a highly significant correlation between cage mesh size and the magnitude of predator impact on common prey. Large—scale stream studies indicated that prey drift and colonization rate were inversely related to predator impact on benthic prey. (2) These patterns were confirmed by field experiments and observations where mesh size was directly manipulated or where exchange rates varied among taxa. In Colorado streams we saw greater predator impacts on Baetis prey when immigration/emigration was restricted vs. when the mesh size of the cage was relatively large. Similarly, the effects of trout in California stream pools were greater when prey turnover rates were low. (3) A re—analysis of Peckarsky's (1985) data shows an inverse relationship between predator impact and prey mobility within a field experiment. (4) Finally, a model that incorporates both predation and exchange of prey indicates that we ought to expect a lower magnitude of predator effects when exchange rates are high. These results suggest that some discrepancies in past studies may be explained by differences in the exchange rates of prey, and that differences in predator effects across different systems or habitats may be related to variation in the rates of prey dispersal and colonization.

[1]  F. Everest.  MIDGET BENTZEL CURRENT SPEED TUBE FOR ECOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS1 , 1967 .

[2]  Ellen Gilinsky,et al.  The Role of Fish Predation and Spatial Heterogeneity in Determining Benthic Community Structure , 1984 .

[3]  S. Cooper,et al.  Differences in the community structure of stream pools containing or lacking trout: With 1 figure in the text , 1984 .

[4]  G. Mittelbach.  Competition Among Refuging Sunfishes and Effects of Fish Density on Littoral Zone Invertebrates , 1988 .

[5]  J. Allan.  THE EFFECTS OF REDUCTION IN TROUT DENSITY ON THE INVERTEBRATE COMMUNITY OF A MOUNTAIN STREAM , 1982 .

[6]  J. Thorp,et al.  Field Experiments on Responses of a Freshwater, Benthic Macroinvertebrate Community to Vertebrate Predators , 1981 .

[7]  J. McArthur,et al.  The Effect of Invertebrate Predators on Leaf Litter Processing in an Alpine Stream , 1984 .

[8]  G. Minshall,et al.  The Influence of Periphyton Abundance on Baetis bicaudatus Distribution and Colonization in a Small Stream , 1988, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[9]  J. Culp.  Experimental Evidence That Stream Macroinvertebrate Community Structure Is Unaffected by Different Densities of Coho Salmon Fry , 1986, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[10]  C. Townsend,et al.  Predation and the prey community of a headwater stream , 1988 .

[11]  S. Dodson,et al.  DO STONEFLY PREDATORS INFLUENCE BENTHIC DISTRIBUTIONS IN STREAMS , 1980 .

[12]  T. Northcote.  Fish in the Structure and Function of Freshwater Ecosystems: A "Top-down" View , 1988 .

[13]  A. Hershey.  Effects of Predatory Sculpin on the Chironomid Communities in an Arctic Lake , 1985 .

[14]  Larry B. Crowder,et al.  Habitat structural complexity and the interaction between bluegills and their prey , 1982 .

[15]  S. Walde,et al.  Invertebrate Predation and Lotic Prey Communities: Evaluation of In Situ Enclosure/Exclosure Experiments , 1984 .

[16]  M. Hixon.  Fish predation and local prey diversity , 1986 .

[17]  C. Townsend,et al.  Field Experiments on the Drifting, Colonization and Continuous Redistribution of Stream Benthos , 1976 .

[18]  J. Thorp.  Two distinct roles for predators in freshwater assemblages , 1986 .

[19]  S. Walde,et al.  Diel feeding periodicity of two predatory stoneflies (Plecoptera) , 1985 .

[20]  M. Vanni.  Freshwater Zooplankton Community Structure: Introduction of Large Invertebrate Predators and Large Herbivores to a Small Species Community , 1988 .

[21]  B. Peckarsky,et al.  Do predaceous stoneflies and siltation affect the structure of stream insect communities colonizing enclosures , 1985 .

[22]  J. F. Gilliam,et al.  STRONG EFFECTS OF FORAGING MINNOWS ON A STREAM BENTHIC INVERTEBRATE COMMUNITY , 1989 .

[23]  I. Schlosser,et al.  Effects of Flow Regime and Cyprinid Predation on a Headwater Stream , 1989 .

[24]  T. Macan.  THE INFLUENCE OF PREDATION ON THE COMPOSITION OF FRESH‐WATER ANIMAL COMMUNITIES , 1977, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[25]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Consumer Control of Lake ProductivityLarge-scale experimental manipulations reveal complex interactions among lake organisms , 1988 .

[26]  Stable Url,et al.  Towards a Predator-Prey Model Incorporating Age Structure: The Effects of Predator and Prey Size on the Predation of Daphnia magna by Ischnura elegans , 1975 .

[27]  G. Minshall,et al.  Colonization of an Introduced Substrate by Stream Macroinvertebrates , 1980 .

[28]  R. Griffiths.  The effect of trout predation on the abundance and production of stream insects , 1981 .

[29]  Mark A. McPeek,et al.  Predation, Competition, and Prey Communities: A Review of Field Experiments , 1985 .

[30]  J. Allan.  The Distributional Ecology and Diversity of Benthic Insects in Cement Creek, Colorado , 1975 .

[31]  R. Edwards,et al.  The effect of vertebrate predation on lotic macroinvertebrate communities in Québec, Canada , 1986 .

[32]  D. Noakes,et al.  Movers and stayers: foraging tactics of young-of-the-year brook charr, Salvelinus fontinalis , 1987 .

[33]  Philip H. Crowley,et al.  PREY DEPLETION BY ODONATE LARVAE: COMBINING EVIDENCE FROM MULTIPLE FIELD EXPERIMENTS' , 1987 .