Comparative recovery of 50-Hz and 100-Hz posttetanic twitch following profound neuromuscular block.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D. Silverman,et al. Pulse Width, Stimulus Intensity, Electrode Placement, and Polarity during Assessment of Neuromuscular Block , 1995, Anesthesiology.
[2] M. Traversa,et al. [Post-tetanic count after 50 and 100 Hz tetanic stimulation for monitoring deep neuromuscular blockade with vecuronium]. , 1994, Minerva Anestesiologica.
[3] D. Silverman,et al. The effect of a tetanic stimulus on the response to subsequent tetanic stimulation. , 1993 .
[4] D. Silverman,et al. Effect of tetanus on subsequent neuromuscular monitoring in patients receiving vecuronium. , 1991, Anesthesiology.
[5] A. Tamilarasan,et al. Relationship between posttetanic count and response to carinal stimulation during vecuronium‐induced neuromuscular blockade , 1987, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.
[6] L. Skovgaard,et al. Tactile evaluation of the posttetanic count (PTC). , 1984, Anesthesiology.
[7] J. Gravenstein,et al. Electrode polarity and peripheral nerve stimulation. , 1982, Anesthesiology.
[8] J. Viby-Mogensen,et al. Clinical assessment of neuromuscular transmission. , 1982, British journal of anaesthesia.
[9] B. Chraemmer-jørgensen,et al. Posttetanic count (PTC): a new method of evaluating an intense nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade. , 1981, Anesthesiology.
[10] H. Brunn,et al. STUDIES WITH MUSCLE RELAXANTS IN UNANESTHETIZED SUBJECTS , 1961, Anesthesiology.