Dynamic heterogeneity controls diffusion and viscosity near biological interfaces

At a nanometer scale, the behavior of biological fluids is largely governed by interfacial physical chemistry. This may manifest as slowed or anomalous diffusion. Here we describe how measures developed for studying glassy systems allow quantitative measurement of interfacial effects on water dynamics, showing that correlated motions of particles near a surface result in a viscosity greater than anticipated from individual particle motions. This effect arises as a fundamental consequence of spatial heterogeneity on nanometer length scales and applies to any fluid near any surface. Increased interfacial viscosity also causes the classic finding that large solutes such as proteins diffuse much more slowly than predicted in bulk water. This has previously been treated via an empirical correction to the solute size: the hydrodynamic radius. Using measurements of quantities from theories of glass dynamics, we can now calculate diffusion constants from molecular details alone, eliminating the empirical correction factor.

[1]  Wei Zhang,et al.  A point‐charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed‐phase quantum mechanical calculations , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[2]  K. Jacobson,et al.  Single-particle tracking: applications to membrane dynamics. , 1997, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[3]  Peter J. Rossky,et al.  A comparison of the structure and dynamics of liquid water at hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces—a molecular dynamics simulation study , 1994 .

[4]  T. Darden,et al.  A smooth particle mesh Ewald method , 1995 .

[5]  J. P. Garrahan,et al.  Decoupling of exchange and persistence times in atomistic models of glass formers. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[6]  Dynamical exchanges in facilitated models of supercooled liquids. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[7]  A. Heuer,et al.  From elementary steps to structural relaxation: a continuous-time random-walk analysis of a supercooled liquid. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[8]  K. Luby-Phelps,et al.  Physical properties of cytoplasm. , 1994, Current opinion in cell biology.

[9]  H. Davis,et al.  A tractable molecular theory of flow in strongly inhomogeneous fluids , 1988 .

[10]  H. Hoang,et al.  Local viscosity of a fluid confined in a narrow pore. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  A. Einstein Über die von der molekularkinetischen Theorie der Wärme geforderte Bewegung von in ruhenden Flüssigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen [AdP 17, 549 (1905)] , 2005, Annalen der Physik.

[12]  J. Klafter,et al.  The random walk's guide to anomalous diffusion: a fractional dynamics approach , 2000 .

[13]  Peter M. Kasson,et al.  Atomic-Resolution Simulations Predict a Transition State for Vesicle Fusion Defined by Contact of a Few Lipid Tails , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[14]  A Joshua Wand,et al.  Mapping the hydration dynamics of ubiquitin. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[15]  A. Verkman Solute and macromolecule diffusion in cellular aqueous compartments. , 2002, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[16]  Chung-Yuan Mou,et al.  The violation of the Stokes–Einstein relation in supercooled water , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Ewald R. Weibel,et al.  CORRELATED MORPHOMETRIC AND BIOCHEMICAL STUDIES ON THE LIVER CELL , 1969, The Journal of cell biology.

[18]  Peter M. Kasson,et al.  GROMACS 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit , 2013, Bioinform..

[19]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Hydration of proteins and polypeptides. , 1974, Advances in protein chemistry.

[20]  Jean-Pierre Hansen,et al.  Phase Transitions of the Lennard-Jones System , 1969 .

[21]  P. Rossky,et al.  How protein surfaces induce anomalous dynamics of hydration water. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[22]  Nancy E Levinger,et al.  Confinement or the nature of the interface? Dynamics of nanoscopic water. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[23]  Pozhar Structure and dynamics of nanofluids: theory and simulations to calculate viscosity , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[24]  B. Halle,et al.  Biomolecular hydration: From water dynamics to hydrodynamics , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  J. P. Garrahan,et al.  Dynamics on the way to forming glass: bubbles in space-time. , 2009, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[26]  E. Montroll Random walks on lattices , 1969 .

[27]  Biman Bagchi,et al.  Water dynamics in the hydration layer around proteins and micelles. , 2005, Chemical reviews.

[28]  B. Halle,et al.  Protein hydration dynamics in solution: a critical survey. , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[29]  C. Mou,et al.  Orientational Relaxation Dynamics of Liquid Water Studied by Molecular Dynamics Simulation , 1999 .

[30]  A S Verkman,et al.  Cytoplasmic viscosity near the cell plasma membrane: translational diffusion of a small fluorescent solute measured by total internal reflection-fluorescence photobleaching recovery. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[31]  Fabio Sterpone,et al.  Magnitude and molecular origin of water slowdown next to a protein. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[32]  P. Hänggi,et al.  Universal equivalence of mean first-passage time and Kramers rate. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[33]  Medina-Noyola Long-time self-diffusion in concentrated colloidal dispersions. , 1988, Physical review letters.

[34]  Thomas M Truskett,et al.  Impact of surface roughness on diffusion of confined fluids. , 2011, The Journal of chemical physics.

[35]  A. Mastro,et al.  Diffusion of a small molecule in the cytoplasm of mammalian cells. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  P. Debenedetti,et al.  Effect of surface polarity on the structure and dynamics of water in nanoscale confinement. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[37]  Jeffrey Skolnick,et al.  Crowding and hydrodynamic interactions likely dominate in vivo macromolecular motion , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  West,et al.  Influence of the environment on anomalous diffusion. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[39]  M. Parrinello,et al.  Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: A new molecular dynamics method , 1981 .

[40]  Salvatore Cannistraro,et al.  Origin of the anomalous diffusion observed by MD simulation at the protein-water interface , 1996 .

[41]  J. García de la Torre,et al.  Prediction of hydrodynamic and other solution properties of rigid proteins from atomic- and residue-level models. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[42]  M. Parrinello,et al.  Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[43]  Todd M. Squires,et al.  Fluid Mechanics of Microrheology , 2010 .

[44]  O. Berger,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of a fluid bilayer of dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine at full hydration, constant pressure, and constant temperature. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[45]  Berk Hess,et al.  P-LINCS:  A Parallel Linear Constraint Solver for Molecular Simulation. , 2008, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[46]  E. Montroll,et al.  Random Walks on Lattices. II , 1965 .

[47]  P. Debenedetti,et al.  Evolution from surface-influenced to bulk-like dynamics in nanoscopically confined water. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[48]  M. Fayer,et al.  Analysis of water in confined geometries and at interfaces. , 2010, Annual review of analytical chemistry.