Scoping Work-Integrated Learning Purposes, Practices and Issues

A range of terms is used in Australian higher education institutions to describe learning approaches and teaching models that provide students with opportunities to engage in learning connected to the world of work. The umbrella term currently being used widely is Work-Integrated Learning (WIL). The common aim of approaches captured under the term WIL is to integrate discipline-specific knowledge learnt in university setting with that learnt in the practice of work through purposefully designed curriculum. In endeavours to extend WIL opportunities for students, universities are currently exploring authentic learning experiences, both within and outside of university settings. Some universities describe these approaches as ‘real-world learning’ or ‘professional learning’. Others refer to ‘social engagement’ with the community and focus on building social capital and citizenship through curriculum design that enables students to engage with the professions through a range of learning experiences. This chapter discusses the context for, and the scope, purposes, characteristics and effectiveness of, WIL across Australian universities as derived from a national scoping study. This study, undertaken in response to a high level of interest in WIL, involved data collection from employers and representatives of state and federal government and students and staff at nearly all Australian universities. Participants in the study consistently reported the benefits, especially in relation to the student-learning experience. Responses highlight the importance of strong partnerships between stakeholders to facilitate effective learning outcomes and a range of issues that shape the quality of approaches and models being adopted, in promoting professional learning.

[1]  D. Kolb Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[2]  M. Bates The assessment of work integrated learning: Symptoms of personal change , 2003 .

[3]  Geoff Scott,et al.  University student engagement and satisfaction with learning and teaching , 2008 .

[4]  David Thomas Edwards Improving Student Achievement Through an Industry Placement , 2008 .

[5]  S. Billett Knowing in practice: re-conceptualising vocational expertise , 2001 .

[6]  Students’ perceptions of undertaking workplace tasks within a foundation degree – health and social care , 2009 .

[7]  William M. Sullivan,et al.  A New Agenda for Higher Education: Shaping a Life of the Mind for Practice , 2008 .

[8]  Martin Smith,et al.  Career development learning: maximising the contribution of work-integrated learning to the student experience. Final project report June 2009 , 2009 .

[9]  S. Moon,et al.  Graduates' Work: Organisational Change and Students' Attributes. , 1997 .

[10]  P. Knight,et al.  Learning, Curriculum and Employability in Higher Education , 2003 .

[11]  Carol-joy Patrick The WIL (Work Integrated Learning) report: a national scoping study , 2008 .

[12]  Victoria J. Marsick,et al.  Toward a unifying framework to support informal learning theory, research and practice , 2009 .

[13]  Griff Foley,et al.  Understanding Adult Education and Training , 1995 .

[14]  J. Mezirow Transformative Learning: Theory to Practice. , 1997 .

[15]  Rebekah M. Davis,et al.  From WIL to Work Ready : Evaluating the student-learning continuum, a qualitative study , 2009 .

[16]  Peter Noonan,et al.  Review of Australian higher education: discussion paper , 2008 .

[17]  Elaine Martin,et al.  Conceptions of Workplace University Education , 1998 .

[18]  Trevor Hart,et al.  Employment, Education and Training , 2008 .

[19]  Janice Orrell,et al.  Work-integrated Learning Programmes: Management and Educational Quality , 2004 .

[20]  Susan M. Savage Urban design education: learning for life in practice , 2005 .