A Bayes-SLIM based methodology for human reliability analysis of lifting operations

Abstract Investigations have shown that human error (HE) is the most common cause of accidents involving lifting operations. So it is essential to conduct human reliability analysis (HRA) in lifting operations. The estimation of human error probabilities (HEPs) is a key to HRA. In this paper, five useful performance shaping factors (PSFs) of lifting operations were introduced and an approach to combine Bayesian methodology and the success likelihood index method (SLIM) was applied to determine the HEPs of various lifting operation errors. A numerical example was used to illustrate the application of the proposed methodology. Relevance to industry Reliability analysis of crane lifting operation has traditionally been difficult without considering human error. The present study suggests that managers could use the Bayesian-SLIM methodology to conduct human reliability analysis and minimize human error in crane lifting operation.

[1]  Franck Guarnieri,et al.  Pouring CREAM into natural gas: The introduction of Common Performance Conditions into the safety management of gas networks , 2013 .

[2]  Paolo Vestrucci The logistic model for assessing human error probabilities using the SLIM method , 1988 .

[3]  J. W. Lynn,et al.  Generic Techniques in Systems Reliability Assessment , 1976 .

[4]  Ali Mosleh,et al.  Deriving causal Bayesian networks from human reliability analysis data: A methodology and example model , 2012 .

[5]  A. D. Swain,et al.  Handbook of human-reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications. Final report , 1983 .

[6]  Robert W. Smith,et al.  AN INDEX OF ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT OPERABILITY: DATA STORE , 1962 .

[7]  Ali Mosleh,et al.  A critique of recent models for human error rate assessment , 1988 .

[8]  Kyung S. Park,et al.  A new method for estimating human error probabilities: AHP-SLIM , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[9]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Error by design: methods for predicting device usability , 2002 .

[10]  Barry Kirwan,et al.  A Guide to Practical Human Reliability Assessment , 1994 .

[11]  Ali Mosleh Bayesian modeling of expert-to-expert variability and dependence in estimating rare event frequencies , 1992 .

[12]  Faisal Khan,et al.  HEPI: A new tool for human error probability calculation for offshore operation , 2006 .

[13]  Christian Genest,et al.  Combining Probability Distributions: A Critique and an Annotated Bibliography , 1986 .

[14]  Eduardo Calixto,et al.  Comparing SLIM, SPAR-H and Bayesian Network Methodologies , 2013 .

[15]  Robert L. Winkler,et al.  The Consensus of Subjective Probability Distributions , 1968 .

[16]  Bernhard Zimolong,et al.  Empirical evaluation of THERP, SLIM and ranking to estimate HEPs , 1992 .

[17]  Laura Painton Swiler,et al.  Bridging the gap between HRA research and HRA practice: A Bayesian network version of SPAR-H , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[18]  M. C. Bryson,et al.  On Combining Data for Estimating the Frequency of Low-Probability Events with Application to Sodium Valve Failure Rates , 1983 .

[19]  Andrew Hale,et al.  Towards risk assessment for crane activities , 2008 .

[20]  Mariarosa Giardina,et al.  Analysis of operator human errors in hydrogen refuelling stations: Comparison between human rate assessment techniques , 2013 .

[21]  John A. Forester,et al.  Expert elicitation approach for performing ATHEANA quantification , 2004, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..