Gravitational-wave searches for cosmic string cusps in Einstein Telescope data using deep learning

Gravitational-wave searches for cosmic strings are currently hindered by the presence of detector glitches, some classes of which strongly resemble cosmic string signals. This confusion greatly reduces the efficiency of searches. A deep-learning model is proposed for the task of distinguishing between gravitational wave signals from cosmic string cusps and simulated blip glitches in design sensitivity data from the future Einstein Telescope. The model is an ensemble consisting of three convolutional neural networks, achieving an accuracy of 79%, a true positive rate of 76%, and a false positive rate of 18%. This marks the first time convolutional neural networks have been trained on a realistic population of Einstein Telescope glitches. On a dataset consisting of signals and glitches, the model is shown to outperform matched filtering, specifically being better at rejecting glitches. The behaviour of the model is interpreted through the application of several methods, including a novel technique called waveform surgery, used to quantify the importance of waveform sections to a classification model. In addition, a method to visualise convolutional neural network activations for one-dimensional time series is proposed and used. These analyses help further the understanding of the morphological differences between cosmic string cusp signals and blip glitches. Because of its classification speed in the order of magnitude of milliseconds, the deep-learning model is suitable for future use as part of a real-time detection pipeline. The deep-learning model is transverse and can therefore potentially be applied to other transient searches.

[1]  S. Caudill,et al.  Simulating Transient Noise Bursts in LIGO with gengli , 2022, 2205.09204.

[2]  S. Caudill,et al.  Simulating transient noise bursts in LIGO with generative adversarial networks , 2022, Physical Review D.

[3]  P. K. Panda,et al.  GWTC-3: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the Second Part of the Third Observing Run , 2021, 2111.03606.

[4]  Duncan A. Brown,et al.  A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community , 2021, 2109.09882.

[5]  I. Bartos,et al.  Generalized Approach to Matched Filtering using Neural Networks , 2021, Physical Review D.

[6]  E. Huerta,et al.  Deep learning ensemble for real-time gravitational wave detection of spinning binary black hole mergers , 2020, 2010.15845.

[7]  Bilal Alsallakh,et al.  Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorch , 2020, ArXiv.

[8]  C. Broeck,et al.  Science case for the Einstein telescope , 2019, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics.

[9]  Natalia Gimelshein,et al.  PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library , 2019, NeurIPS.

[10]  Robert Eliot Spero,et al.  The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna: Unveiling the Millihertz Gravitational Wave Sky , 2019, 1907.06482.

[11]  J. Kissel,et al.  Blip glitches in Advanced LIGO data , 2019, Classical and Quantum Gravity.

[12]  B. A. Boom,et al.  GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs , 2018 .

[13]  Duncan A. Brown,et al.  PyCBC Inference: A Python-based Parameter Estimation Toolkit for Compact Binary Coalescence Signals , 2018, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.

[14]  Frank Hutter,et al.  Decoupled Weight Decay Regularization , 2017, ICLR.

[15]  Heiga Zen,et al.  WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audio , 2016, SSW.

[16]  Alex Graves,et al.  Conditional Image Generation with PixelCNN Decoders , 2016, NIPS.

[17]  D. Reitze The Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger , 2016 .

[18]  Jorge Cadima,et al.  Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[19]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[20]  Dumitru Erhan,et al.  Going deeper with convolutions , 2014, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[21]  C. Broeck,et al.  Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector , 2014, 1408.3978.

[22]  K. Olum,et al.  Number of cosmic string loops , 2013, 1309.6637.

[23]  M. Sakellariadou,et al.  Cosmic string loop distribution on all length scales and at any redshift , 2010, 1006.0931.

[24]  E. Copeland,et al.  Cosmic strings and superstrings , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[25]  P. Sarin,et al.  First LIGO search for gravitational wave bursts from cosmic (super)strings , 2009 .

[26]  M. Sakellariadou Cosmic Strings and Cosmic Superstrings , 2009, 0902.0569.

[27]  J. Read,et al.  Gravitational wave bursts from cosmic (super)strings: Quantitative analysis and constraints , 2006, gr-qc/0603115.

[28]  Bruce Allen,et al.  FINDCHIRP: an algorithm for detection of gravitational waves from inspiraling compact binaries , 2005, gr-qc/0509116.

[29]  T. Damour,et al.  Gravitational radiation from cosmic (super)strings: Bursts, stochastic background, and observational windows , 2004, hep-th/0410222.

[30]  Michael Brady,et al.  Saliency, Scale and Image Description , 2001, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[31]  T. Damour,et al.  Gravitational wave bursts from cusps and kinks on cosmic strings , 2001, gr-qc/0104026.

[32]  T. Damour,et al.  Gravitational wave bursts from cosmic strings , 2000, Physical review letters.

[33]  R. J. Crewther,et al.  Introduction to quantum field theory , 1995, hep-th/9505152.

[34]  E. P. S. Shellard,et al.  Cosmic Strings and Other Topological Defects , 1995 .

[35]  T W B Kibble,et al.  Topology of cosmic domains and strings , 1976 .

[36]  John Corcoran,et al.  String theory , 1974, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[37]  M. J. Williams,et al.  GWTC-2.1: Deep extended catalog of compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run , 2021, Physical Review D.

[38]  M. J. Williams,et al.  Constraints on Cosmic Strings Using Data from the Third Advanced LIGO – Virgo Observing Run , 2021 .

[39]  R. Abbott,et al.  GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First Half of the Third Observing Run , 2021 .

[40]  M. J. Williams,et al.  GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First Half of the Third Observing Run , 2021 .

[41]  Shaughnessy,et al.  All-Sky Search for Short Gravitational-Wave Bursts in the Second Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo Run , 2019 .

[42]  B. A. Boom,et al.  Constraints on cosmic strings using data from the first Advanced LIGO observing run B , 2018 .

[43]  S. Klimenko,et al.  Advanced LIGO , 2014, 1411.4547.

[44]  A. Schwarz Topologically Stable Defects , 1993 .

[45]  B. Nilsson,et al.  Kaluza-Klein Supergravity , 1986 .

[46]  Revaz Valerianovich Gamkrelidze,et al.  Topology and Geometry , 1970 .

[47]  C. Helstrom,et al.  Statistical theory of signal detection , 1968 .

[48]  P. Graff,et al.  Constraints on Cosmic Strings from the LIGO-Virgo Gravitational-Wave Detectors. , 2022 .