Ultrasonographic Comparative Study of Abdominal Circumference in Fetuses of North Indian Women

Sonography has transformed the antenatal care of pregnant women and it is regarded as a well-established method of dating pregnancy and monitoring fetal growth. This study was performed in the department of Anatomy, Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Radiology of M. L. N. Medical College and associated hospitals of Allahabad. We included 1436 uncomplicated singleton pregnant women. Abdominal circumference was measured in a plane perpendicular to the fetal spine. Umbilical vein used as a landmark. Measurements were taken by plane geometry around the outline of the abdominal fetal skin. For each gestational age (GA), abdominal circumference (AC) measurements, mean abdominal circumference and standard deviation (SD) were tabulated and the mean abdominal circumference measurement of present study was statistically compared with that of published data by Hadlock et al., J.C. Smulian et al., Kurmanavicius et al, Snijder &Nicoloids and Pam Loughna et al. Unpaired t-test was performed with Shahida Zaidi et al (Pakistan), Piyamas et al. (Thailand) and with Hadlock et al. London (UK) normogram. The significant differences present in both second and third trimester. Linear regression analysis was selected to prepare a population specific AC table for every respective GA. Linear regression equation: AC=-51.5102+9.99023GA. This difference is due to genetic, racial, inadequate nutrition and socioeconomic factors. These emphasize the need for a locally generated fetal growth reference along with prospective data on obstetric and perinatal outcomes to enable the development of better clinical guidelines.

[1]  H. V. van Geijn,et al.  The fetal skeleton; ultrasonographic evaluation of the normal growth. , 1990, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[2]  D. Altman,et al.  Charts of fetal size: 3. Abdominal measurements , 1994, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[3]  F. P. Hadlock,et al.  Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. The value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements. , 1984, Radiology.

[4]  A. Omair,et al.  Sonographic foetal measurements in a cohort of population of Karachi, Pakistan. , 2009, JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association.

[5]  G. Engholm,et al.  Evaluation of ultrasound‐estimated date of delivery in 17 450 spontaneous singleton births: do we need to modify Naegele's rule? , 1999, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[6]  S. Campbell,et al.  Routine Ultrasound Screening for the Prediction of Gestational Age , 1985, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  J. Newnham,et al.  Screening for the Small Fetus: A Study of the Relative Efficacies of Ultrasound Biometry and Symphysiofundal Height , 1995, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[8]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Fetal biometry at 14–40 weeks' gestation , 1994, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[9]  L. Chitty,et al.  Fetal Size and Dating: Charts Recommended for Clinical Obstetric Practice , 2009 .

[10]  Piyamas Saksiriwuttho,et al.  Fetal biometry charts for normal pregnant women in northeastern Thailand. , 2007, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet.

[11]  P. Royston,et al.  Estimated date of delivery from last menstrual period and ultrasound scan: which is more accurate? , 1993, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[12]  F. P. Hadlock,et al.  Fetal abdominal circumference as a predictor of menstrual age. , 1982, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  Andrzej Tretyn,et al.  Fetal biometry between 20-42 weeks of gestation for Polish population. , 2008, Ginekologia polska.

[14]  Patrick Royston,et al.  Fetal ultrasound biometry: 2. Abdomen and femur length reference values , 1999, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.