Eye Tracking Indicators of Reading Approaches in Text-Picture Comprehension

Despite numerous researches on reading as well as multimedia comprehension, reading approaches in text-picture comprehension have become a focus of research only rarely. The current experiment aims at exploring text-picture comprehension in different reading approaches with item solving. In a within subjects design using eye tracking, seventeen secondary school students processed our blended text and picture materials in three different ways. (1) Unguided processing with text and picture and without the question. (2) Information gathering to answer the question after the prior experience with text and pictures. (3) Comprehending text and pictures to solve the task with the prior information of the question. Eye tracking data showed that text and picture play different roles in comprehension in different reading approaches. The data suggest that (1) text plays the main role to construct the mental model in unguided spontaneous processing of text and picture. (2) Students seem to mainly rely on the picture as an external representation when trying to answer a question after the prior experience with the material. (3)Text and picture are both used heavily when students work out an answer with the prior experience with the question presented. The text likely plays a major part in guiding the processing of meaning, whereas the picture is used as an external representation for information retrieval. Our work provides a first step towards an Item Solving Model in Text-Picture Comprehension. It also provides pedagogical implications for learning in secondary school.

[1]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[2]  Kenneth Holmqvist,et al.  Eye tracking: a comprehensive guide to methods and measures , 2011 .

[3]  E. Rothkopf Learning from Written Instructive Materials: An Exploration of the Control of Inspection Behavior by Test-Like Events , 1966 .

[4]  M. Hegarty Mental animation: inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  Jürgen Baumert,et al.  What makes text-picture-integration difficult? A structural and procedural analysis of textbook requirements , 2011 .

[6]  Hilde Haider,et al.  From Marbles to Numbers—Estimation Influences Looking Patterns on Arithmetic Problems , 2014 .

[7]  M. Anne Britt,et al.  Relevance processes in multiple document comprehension , 2012 .

[8]  R. Mayer Models for Understanding , 1989 .

[9]  Julian N. Marewski,et al.  Once and for all—How people change strategy to ignore irrelevant information in visual tasks , 2015, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning , 2005 .

[11]  L. T. Frase,et al.  Effect of question location, pacing, and mode upon retention of prose material. , 1968, Journal of educational psychology.

[12]  Cheryl I. Johnson,et al.  An eye movement analysis of the spatial contiguity effect in multimedia learning. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[13]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Spatial schemas in depictions , 1999 .

[14]  Marcus Nyström,et al.  How a picture facilitates the process of learning from text: Evidence for scaffolding , 2013 .

[15]  Jürgen Baumert,et al.  Dynamics of mental model construction from text and graphics , 2013 .

[16]  Gilbert Saporta,et al.  Models for Understanding Versus Models for Prediction , 2008 .

[17]  Robert J. K. Jacob,et al.  Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research : Ready to deliver the promises , 2002 .

[18]  M. Bannert,et al.  Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation , 2003 .

[19]  T. Andre Does Answering Higher-Level Questions While Reading Facilitate Productive Learning? , 1979 .

[20]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Constructing Multidimensional Situation Models During Reading , 1998 .

[21]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning , 2021, The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning.

[22]  Theo van Leeuwen,et al.  Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design , 1996 .

[23]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  A Schema-Theoretic View of Basic Processes in Reading Comprehension. Technical Report No. 306. , 1988 .

[24]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[25]  Benjamin Naumann,et al.  Mental Representations A Dual Coding Approach , 2016 .

[26]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  Mehmet Fatih Ozmantar,et al.  A functional taxonomy of multiple representations: A tool for analysing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge , 2012 .

[28]  Lester C. Loschky,et al.  Linking attentional processes and conceptual problem solving: visual cues facilitate the automaticity of extracting relevant information from diagrams , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[29]  Florian Schmidt-Weigand,et al.  Explaining the modality and contiguity effects: New insights from investigating students' viewing behaviour , 2010 .

[30]  L. T. Frase,et al.  Learning from prose material: length of passage, knowledge of results, and position of questions. , 1967, Journal of educational psychology.

[31]  Richard J. Hamilton A Framework for the Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Adjunct Questions and Objectives , 1985 .

[32]  John P. Rickards Adjunct Postquestions in Text: A Critical Review of Methods and Processes , 1979 .

[33]  John D. Krumboltz Learning and the educational process : selected papers from the Research Conference on Learning and the Educational Process, held at Stanford University, June 22-July 31, 1964 , 1965 .

[34]  Joseph H. Goldberg,et al.  Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: methods and constructs , 1999 .

[35]  W. Winn,et al.  The role of graphics in training documents: toward an explanatory theory of how they communicate , 1989 .

[36]  Peter R. Denner,et al.  Inserted questions as aids to reading text , 1978 .

[37]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987, Cogn. Sci..