ZPEG: A hybrid DPCM-DCT based approach for compression of Z-stack images

Modern imaging technology permits obtaining images at varying depths along the thickness, or the Z-axis of the sample being imaged. A stack of multiple such images is called a Z-stack image. The focus capability offered by Z-stack images is critical for many digital pathology applications. A single Z-stack image may result in several hundred gigabytes of data, and needs to be compressed for archival and distribution purposes. Currently, the existing methods for compression of Z-stack images such as JPEG and JPEG 2000 compress each focal plane independently, and do not take advantage of the Z-signal redundancy. It is possible to achieve additional compression efficiency over the existing methods, by exploiting the high Z-signal correlation during image compression. In this paper, we propose a novel algorithm for compression of Z-stack images, which we term as ZPEG. ZPEG extends the popular discrete-cosine transform (DCT) based image encoder to compress Z-stack images. This is achieved by decorrelating the neighboring layers of the Z-stack image using differential pulse-code modulation (DPCM). PSNR measurements, as well as subjective evaluations by experts indicate that ZPEG can encode Z-stack images at a higher quality as compared to JPEG, JPEG 2000 and JP3D at compression ratios below 50:1.

[1]  M Lundin,et al.  A digital atlas of breast histopathology: an application of web based virtual microscopy , 2004, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[2]  Peter Schelkens,et al.  Compression of medical volumetric datasets: physical and psychovisual performance comparison of the emerging JP3D standard and JPEG2000 , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[3]  Kelby K. Chan,et al.  Visualization and volumetric compression , 1991, Medical Imaging.

[4]  Michael W. Marcellin,et al.  Compression of hyperspectral imagery using the 3-D DCT and hybrid DPCM/DCT , 1995, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[5]  D. Herbert,et al.  Transition of a dental histology course from light to virtual microscopy. , 2009, Journal of dental education.

[6]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  The JPEG 2000 still image compression standard , 2001, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[7]  L. Pantanowitz Digital images and the future of digital pathology , 2010, Journal of pathology informatics.

[8]  Johannes Bernarding,et al.  Virtual 3D microscopy using multiplane whole slide images in diagnostic pathology. , 2008, American journal of clinical pathology.

[9]  Zixiang Xiong,et al.  Lossy-to-lossless compression of medical volumetric data using three-dimensional integer wavelet transforms , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Evaluation of JP3D for lossy and lossless compression of hyperspectral imagery , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[11]  Gloria Bueno García,et al.  Critical Comparison of 31 Commercially Available Digital Slide Systems in Pathology , 2006, International journal of surgical pathology.

[12]  Gregory K. Wallace,et al.  The JPEG still picture compression standard , 1992 .

[13]  Thomas Richter,et al.  JPEG2000 3D compression vs. 2D compression: an assessment of artifact amount and computing time in compressing thin-section abdomen CT images. , 2009, Medical physics.