Interpersonal Variables and Their Impact on the Perceived Validity of Peer Assessment in Engineering PBL

Intra-team peer assessments have become the norm for performance and attribute assessment in problem and project based learning activities. However, research on the effects of interpersonal variables on these assessment practices is limited. This study examined the relationship between interpersonal variables and student perceptions on the validity of peer assessment. In order to understand the relationship between social interaction and its effects on peer assessment, four interpersonal variables were identified in this study: psychological safety, value diversity, interdependence, and trust. Fifty five undergraduate engineering students working in teams of 5 to 6 participated in a survey after having completed their first formative peer assessment. Preliminary findings from this study and evidence from other studies support the view that interpersonal variables have the potential to affect peer assessment and influence the learning outcomes

[1]  A. Edmondson Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams , 1999 .

[2]  Onne Janssen,et al.  How Task and Person Conflict Shape the Role of Positive Interdependence in Management Teams , 1999 .

[3]  George G. Mitchell,et al.  An assessment strategy to determine learning outcomes in a software engineering problem-based learning course , 2004 .

[4]  Mien Segers,et al.  Peer assessment for learning from a social perspective: The influence of interpersonal variables and structural features , 2009 .

[5]  Lisa M. Bradley,et al.  Differential Effects of Task and Reward Interdependence on Perceived Helping Behavior, Effort, and Group Performance , 2003 .

[6]  Keith J. Topping,et al.  Methodological quandaries in studying process and outcomes in peer assessment , 2010 .

[7]  L.J. Leifer,et al.  Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[8]  Anne Gardner,et al.  Investigating the capacity of self and peer assessment activities to engage students and promote learning , 2010 .

[9]  F. Dochy,et al.  Peer assessment in problem based learning , 2001 .

[10]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS , 1993 .

[11]  David W. Johnson,et al.  The impact of positive goal and resource interdependence on achievement, interaction, and attitudes , 1991 .

[12]  C. Evans Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education , 2013 .

[13]  N. Falchikov Peer Feedback Marking: Developing Peer Assessment , 1995 .

[14]  K. Topping Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities , 1998 .

[15]  Mien Segers,et al.  Peer Assessment as a Collaborative Learning Activity: The Role of Interpersonal Variables and Conceptions. , 2010 .

[16]  Gerben S. van der Vegt,et al.  Intragroup interdependence and effectiveness: Review and proposed directions for theory and practice , 2002 .

[17]  K. Dirks The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  Lars-Ove Dahlgren,et al.  Portraits of PBL: students' experiences of the characteristics of problem-based learning in physiotherapy, computer engineering and psychology , 2002 .

[19]  Linda Stanier,et al.  Peer assessment and group work as vehicles for student empowerment: A module evaluation , 1997 .

[20]  Kara A. Incalcaterra,et al.  A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[21]  F. Dochy,et al.  Assessment as a tool for learning , 1997 .