Observability and Estimability of Collaborative Opportunistic Navigation with Pseudorange Measurements

The observability and estimability of collaborative opportunistic navigation (COpNav) environments are studied. A COpNav environment can be thought of as a radio frequency signal landscape within which one or more radio frequency receiver locate themselves in space and time by extracting and possibly sharing information from ambient signals of opportunity (SOPs). Available SOPs may have a fully-known, partially-known, or unknown characterization. In the present work, the receivers are assumed to draw only pseudorange-type measurements from the SOPs. Separate observations are fused to produce an estimate of each receiver’s position, velocity, and time (PVT). Since not all SOP states in the COpNav environment may be known a priori, the receivers must estimate the unknown SOP states of interest simultaneously with their own PVT. This paper establishes the minimal conditions under which a COpNav environment consisting of multiple receivers and multiple SOPs is completely observable. In scenarios where the COpNav environment is not completely observable, the observable states, if any, are specified. Moreover, for the completely observable scenarios, the degree of observability, commonly referred to as estimability, of the various states is studied, with particular attention paid to the states with exceptionally good and poor observability.

[1]  Kenneth M. Pesyna,et al.  Tightly-Coupled Opportunistic Navigation for Deep Urban and Indoor Positioning , 2011 .

[2]  Thiagalingam Kirubarajan,et al.  Estimation with Applications to Tracking and Navigation , 2001 .

[3]  Mark L. Psiaki,et al.  Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of GPS Carrier Phase for Spacecraft Relative Navigation , 2005 .

[4]  I. Bar-Itzhack,et al.  Observability analysis of piece-wise constant systems. I. Theory , 1992 .

[5]  John L. Casti,et al.  Recent Developments and Future Perspectives in Nonlinear System Theory , 1982 .

[6]  Roy M. Howard,et al.  Linear System Theory , 1992 .

[7]  A. Krener,et al.  Nonlinear controllability and observability , 1977 .

[8]  Todd E. Humphreys,et al.  Observability Analysis of Opportunistic Navigation with Pseudorange Measurements , 2012 .

[9]  Kenneth M. Pesyna,et al.  Constructing a continuous phase time history from TDMA signals for opportunistic navigation , 2012, Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium.

[10]  Z. M. Kassas,et al.  Discretisation of continuous-time dynamic multi-input multi-output systems with non-uniform delays , 2011 .

[11]  F. Ham,et al.  Observability, Eigenvalues, and Kalman Filtering , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[12]  Wilson J. Rugh,et al.  Linear system theory (2nd ed.) , 1996 .

[13]  Teresa A. Vidal-Calleja,et al.  On the Observability of Bearing-only SLAM , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[14]  Bradford W. Parkinson,et al.  Global positioning system : theory and applications , 1996 .

[15]  Gamini Dissanayake,et al.  Observability analysis of SLAM using fisher information matrix , 2008, 2008 10th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision.

[16]  E. Nettleton,et al.  On the linear and nonlinear observability analysis of the SLAM problem , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics.

[17]  Javier Ibanez Guzman,et al.  On the Observability and Observability Analysis of SLAM , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[18]  Juan Andrade-Cetto,et al.  The effects of partial observability when building fully correlated maps , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[19]  Hugh F. Durrant-Whyte,et al.  Simultaneous localization and mapping: part I , 2006, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[20]  M. Anguelova Observability and identifiability of nonlinear systems with applications in biology , 2007 .