Combined application of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis as a methodological approach for the assessment of fisheries

Background, aim, and scopeThe synergistic use of life cycle assessment (LCA) and data envelopment analysis (DEA) is proposed as a new methodological approach to link environmental and socioeconomic assessments of fisheries. Therefore, the goal is to combine LCA and DEA in order to increase the assessment ability of both tools when applied to these fisheries. Specifically, the joint inclusion of economic aspects and the consideration of currently underrepresented environmental impact categories are tackled.Materials and methodsA five-step method is presented to combine LCA and DEA so that operational benchmarking and eco-efficiency verification are included together with the assessment of the environmental performance of fishing vessels. Some guidelines are also provided to orientate methodological choices in DEA. Furthermore, the applicability of the method for fisheries is discussed using a Spanish coastal trawl fishery as an example.ResultsThe use of the five-step LCA+DEA method for fisheries demonstrated the dependence of environmental impacts on the operational performance of the vessels. Operational inefficiencies were detected and target performance improvement values were consequently defined for the inefficient vessels. The combined method favored quantification of potential eco-efficiency gains. Optional features of DEA models allowed the inclusion of controversial impact issues such as by-catch discarding.DiscussionAs demonstrated by the application of the method to the trawling case study, this methodology facilitates joint consideration of the environmental impacts of the fleet together with economic issues such as operational efficiency. Moreover, the potential inclusion of “bad outputs” in DEA models makes the proposed method suitable for quantifying the potential improvements in currently underrepresented issue areas such as discarding by-catch.ConclusionsThe proposed methodological approach was found as an adequate alternative to complement the mere use of LCA for fisheries. Its use avoids problems with standard deviations which usually arise when LCA practitioners work with average inventories. Moreover, the new approach facilitates the interpretation of the results for practitioners who deal with multiple individual LCAs for the same fishery. Furthermore, the joint application of LCA and DEA carry synergistic effects related to the link between operational efficiency and environmental impacts.Recommendations and perspectivesThe proposed LCA+DEA approach for fisheries is recommended for its regular use. The need of multiple input/output data for multiple vessels is not seen as a limitation in the case of fisheries research.

[1]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: Data Envelopment Analysis with Spreadsheets and DEA Excel Solver , 2002 .

[2]  J. Oehlenschläger,et al.  Seafood research from fish to dish: quality, safety and processing of wild and farmed fish , 2006 .

[3]  Gumersindo Feijoo,et al.  The link between operational efficiency and environmental impacts. A joint application of Life Cycle Assessment and Data Envelopment Analysis. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[4]  Harald Ellingsen,et al.  Energy consumption in the Norwegian fisheries , 2009 .

[5]  Sebastián Lozano,et al.  Environmental impact efficiency in mussel cultivation , 2010 .

[6]  Nathan Pelletier,et al.  Impact categories for life cycle assessment research of seafood production systems: Review and prospectus , 2007 .

[7]  A. Tillman,et al.  Normative ethics and methodology for life cycle assessment , 2005 .

[8]  Peter Tyedmers,et al.  Sustainability of seafood production and consumption: an introduction to the special issue , 2009 .

[9]  Bo Pedersen Weidema,et al.  Data quality management for life cycle inventories—an example of using data quality indicators☆ , 1996 .

[10]  A. Hospido,et al.  Life cycle environmental impacts of Spanish tuna fisheries , 2005 .

[11]  Scott Duncan,et al.  A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment , 2008 .

[12]  B. Mattsson,et al.  Life Cycle assessment of frozen cod fillets including fishery-specific environmental impacts , 2003 .

[13]  Peter Tyedmers,et al.  The Future for Fisheries , 2003, Science.

[14]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Estimating preferred target input−output levels using data envelopment analysis , 1992 .

[15]  N. Halberg,et al.  Modelling representative and coherent Danish farm types based on farm accountancy data for use in environmental assessments , 2006 .

[16]  Ib Sillebak Kristensen,et al.  An LC inventory based on representative and coherent farm types , 2004 .

[17]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Measuring Eco‐efficiency of Production with Data Envelopment Analysis , 2005 .

[18]  A. Iles Making the seafood industry more sustainable: creating production chain transparency and accountability , 2007 .

[19]  P. Tyedmers,et al.  Skippers, spotters and seiners: Analysis of the "skipper effect" in US menhaden (Brevoortia spp.) purse-seine fisheries , 2007 .

[20]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Eco-efficiency analysis of consumer durables using absolute shadow prices , 2007 .

[21]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[22]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[23]  Friederike Ziegler,et al.  Environmental life cycle assessment of Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) caught along the Swedish west coast by creels and conventional trawls—LCA methodology with case study , 2008 .

[24]  G. Psacharopoulos Overview and methodology , 1991 .

[25]  R. Hilborn,et al.  Rebuilding Global Fisheries , 2009, Science.

[26]  S. Schmidheiny Changing Course: A Global Business Perspective on Development and the Environment , 1992 .

[27]  Walter Klöpffer,et al.  Life cycle assessment , 1997, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[28]  M. Kortelainen,et al.  Dynamic environmental performance analysis: A Malmquist index approach , 2008 .

[29]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Life cycle assessment An operational guide to the ISO standards , 2001 .

[30]  R. Banker Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis , 1984 .

[31]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Performance measurement and best-practice benchmarking of mutual funds: combining stochastic dominance criteria with data envelopment analysis , 2007 .

[32]  John J. Reap,et al.  A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment , 2008 .