Heuristic evaluation applied to library web services

Purpose – The purpose of the paper is to present usability heuristics for the evaluation of public library web services.Design/methodology/approach – Heuristics for library services are based on Nielsen's classical list of heuristics and results of previous usability research of library web services. A total of 15 public library web sites were evaluated on the basis of these applied heuristics. One part of the study was supported through usability tests. The results of these studies were utilized to evaluate the applied heuristics.Findings – The applied heuristics are divided into three categories: heuristics critical from the usability viewpoint; heuristics concerning major problems; and heuristics connected to minor usability problems but still important and concerning conventions of web design. The use of the heuristics and the results they give are evaluated to provide a basis for their use in future.Research limitations/implications – The applied heuristics lists have been tested in two different stu...

[1]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Heuristics for User Interface Design , 2006 .

[2]  Gwyneth H. Crowley,et al.  User perceptions of the library’s web pages: A focus group study at Texas A&M University , 2002 .

[3]  Forbes Gibb,et al.  Usability and impact of digital libraries: a review , 2006, Online Inf. Rev..

[4]  Laura Kaspari Hohmann.  Prescriptions for usable library web sites , 2001 .

[5]  Wendy Chisholm.  Checklist of Checkpoints for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 , 1999 .

[6]  Louis B. Rosenfeld,et al.  Information architecture for the world wide web - designing large-scale web sites , 1998 .

[7]  Maja Zumer,et al.  Web pages of Slovenian public libraries: evaluation and guidelines , 2004, J. Documentation.

[8]  Robert A. Virzi,et al.  Refining the Test Phase of Usability Evaluation: How Many Subjects Is Enough? , 1992 .

[9]  Joseph F. Dumas,et al.  A Practical Guide to Usability Testing , 1993 .

[10]  Andrew K. Pace.  The Usability Toolbox , 2003 .

[11]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Damaged Merchandise? A Review of Experiments That Compare Usability Evaluation Methods , 1998, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[12]  John Karat,et al.  User-Centered Software Evaluation Methodologies , 1997 .

[13]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[14]  Brenda L. Battleson,et al.  Usability testing of an academic library Web site: a case study , 2001 .

[15]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability inspection methods , 1994, CHI 95 Conference Companion.

[16]  Steve Krug,et al.  Don't Make Me Think!: A Common Sense Approach to Web Usability , 2000 .

[17]  Andrew Sears,et al.  Heuristic Walkthroughs: Finding the Problems Without the Noise , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[18]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Heuristic Evaluation of Prototypes (individual) , 2022 .

[19]  Catherine Ebenezer.  Usability evaluation of an NHS library website. , 2003, Health information and libraries journal.

[20]  Carolyn Snyder,et al.  Web Site Usability: A Designer's Guide , 1997 .

[21]  Mark A. Spivey.  The vocabulary of library home pages: an influence on diverse and remote end-users , 2000 .

[22]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing information-abundant web sites: issues and recommendations , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[23]  Audrone Glosiene,et al.  Towards a usability framework for memory institutions , 2005 .

[24]  Elaine G. Toms,et al.  Usability of the Academic Library Web Site: Implications for Design , 2001 .

[25]  Robin Jeffries,et al.  User interface evaluation in the real world: a comparison of four techniques , 1991, CHI.

[26]  Ruth Dickstein,et al.  Usability testing at the University of Arizona library : How to let the users in on the design , 2000 .