Network proximity in the geography of research collaboration

This paper deals with the questions of how network proximity influences the structure of inter-regional collaborations and how it interacts with geography. I first introduce a new, theoretically grounded measure of inter-regional network proximity. Then, I use data on European scientific co-publications in the field of chemistry between 2001 and 2005 to assess those questions. The main findings reveal that inter-regional network proximity is important in determining future collaborations but its effect is mediated by geography. Most importantly, a clear substitution pattern is revealed showing that network proximity benefits mostly international collaborations.

[1]  Jarno Hoekman,et al.  Death of Distance in Science? A Gravity Approach to Research Collaboration , 2009 .

[2]  Mario A. Maggioni,et al.  Space Vs. Networks in the Geography of Innovation: A European Analysis , 2007 .

[3]  André Torre,et al.  Proximity and Localization , 2005 .

[4]  Pierre-Alexandre Balland,et al.  Proximity and the Evolution of Collaboration Networks: Evidence from Research and Development Projects within the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Industry , 2012 .

[5]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Small Worlds and Regional Innovation , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[6]  Mario A. Maggioni,et al.  Space vs. Networks in the Geography of Innovation: A European Analysis , 2006 .

[7]  Claire Nauwelaers,et al.  Guide to Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisations (RIS 3) , 2012 .

[8]  James P. LeSage,et al.  The Role of R&D Collaboration Networks on Regional Innovation Performance , 2014 .

[9]  Tom Broekel,et al.  Modeling Knowledge Networks in Economic Geography: A Discussion of Four Empirical Strategies , 2013 .

[10]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  “Being There”: Proximity, Organization, and Culture in the Development and Adoption of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies , 1995 .

[11]  Sanjeev Goyal,et al.  Matching and Network Effects , 2006 .

[12]  Thomas Brambor,et al.  Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses , 2006, Political Analysis.

[13]  E. Giuliani,et al.  Who are the researchers that are collaborating with industry? An analysis of the wine sectors in Chile, South Africa and Italy , 2010 .

[14]  R. Gulati,et al.  Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  Brian W. Rogers,et al.  Meeting Strangers and Friends of Friends: How Random are Social Networks? , 2007 .

[16]  Charles I. Jones,et al.  R & D-Based Models of Economic Growth , 1995, Journal of Political Economy.

[17]  Vincent Frigant,et al.  The persistent heterogeneity of trade patterns: A comparison of four European Automotive Global Production Networks , 2014 .

[18]  J. Sylvan Katz,et al.  Geographical proximity and scientific collaboration , 1994, Scientometrics.

[19]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Multi-University Research Teams: Shifting Impact, Geography, and Stratification in Science , 2008, Science.

[20]  Mario A. Maggioni,et al.  Knowledge networks across Europe: which distance matters? , 2009 .

[21]  K. Frenken,et al.  The citation impact of research collaboration in science‐based industries: A spatial‐institutional analysis , 2010 .

[22]  C. Bonnefond,et al.  Does social class affect nutrition knowledge and food preferences among Chinese urban adults , 2015 .

[23]  A. Varga,et al.  Research productivity and the quality of interregional knowledge networks , 2013 .

[24]  R. Tijssen,et al.  Research collaboration at a distance: Changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe , 2010 .

[25]  Nicolas Carayol,et al.  Unintended triadic closure in social networks: The strategic formation of research collaborations between French inventors , 2019, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.

[26]  Benjamin F. Jones The Burden of Knowledge and the &Apos;Death of the Renaissance Man&Apos;: Is Innovation Getting Harder? , 2005 .

[27]  Tamás Sebestyén,et al.  A novel comprehensive index of network position and node characteristics in knowledge networks: Ego network quality , 2013 .

[28]  Thomas Banchoff,et al.  Institutions, Inertia and European Union Research Policy , 2002 .

[29]  B. Looy,et al.  Co-Ownership of Intellectual Property: Exploring the Value-Appropriation and Value-Creation Implications of Co-Patenting with Different Partners , 2013 .

[30]  Ajay Agrawal,et al.  Why are some regions more innovative than others? The role of small firms in the presence of large labs , 2014 .

[31]  Massimo Riccaboni,et al.  Networks of innovators within and across borders. Evidence from patent data , 2013 .

[32]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Geographic Constraints on Knowledge Spillovers: Political Borders vs. Spatial Proximity , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[33]  J. S. Katz,et al.  What is research collaboration , 1997 .

[34]  Tom Broekel,et al.  Modeling knowledge networks in economic geography: a discussion of four methods , 2013, The Annals of Regional Science.

[35]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[36]  S. Breschi,et al.  Mobility of Skilled Workers and Co-Invention Networks: An Anatomy of Localized Knowledge Flows , 2009 .

[37]  Pereau Jean-Christophe,et al.  The tragedy of ecosystems in open-access , 2015 .

[38]  Thomas Brenner,et al.  Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography # 09 . 04 Methodological Issues in Measuring Innovation Performance of Spatial Units , 2009 .

[39]  Harold Maurice Collins,et al.  Tacit Knowledge, Trust and the Q of Sapphire , 2001 .

[40]  Koen Frenken,et al.  The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration , 2007 .

[41]  Jarno Hoekman,et al.  Spatial scientometrics: Towards a cumulative research program , 2009, J. Informetrics.

[42]  R. Tijssen,et al.  Acquisition of European research funds and its effect on international scientific collaboration. , 2013 .

[43]  M. Barber,et al.  Spatial interaction modelling of cross-region R&D collaborations: empirical evidence from the 5th EU framework programme , 2009, 1004.3425.

[44]  R. Freeman,et al.  Why and Wherefore of Increased Scientific Collaboration , 2014 .

[45]  R. Boschma,et al.  Proximity and Innovation: From Statics to Dynamics , 2015 .

[46]  Lucio Picci,et al.  The Internationalization of Inventive Activity: A Gravity Model Using Patent Data , 2010 .

[47]  E. Andersen,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning , 1992 .

[48]  Thomas Brenner,et al.  Embeddedness of regions in European knowledge networks: a comparative analysis of inter-regional R&D collaborations, co-patents and co-publications , 2014 .

[49]  Jouke van Dijk,et al.  ERSA Conference participation: does location matter? , 2006 .

[50]  Ron Boschma,et al.  The dynamics of interfirm networks along the industry life cycle: The case of the global video game industry, 1987–2007 , 2013 .

[51]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Network Structure, Self-Organization and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science.Research Policy, 34(10), 2005, 1608-1618. , 2005, 0911.4299.

[52]  Yannick Lung,et al.  Innovation and Proximity , 1999 .

[53]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  A Practitioner’s Guide to Cluster-Robust Inference , 2015, The Journal of Human Resources.

[54]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  Tacit knowledge and the economic geography of context, or The undefinable tacitness of being (there) , 2003 .

[55]  Dalila Nicet-Chenaf,et al.  What is so specific with Middle-East and North-African pattern of growth and structural change? A quantitative comparative analysis , 2014 .

[56]  J. Thill,et al.  Spatial interaction modelling , 2003 .

[57]  M. Castells The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[58]  A. Venables,et al.  Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy , 2004 .

[59]  J. Hoekman,et al.  The geography of collaborative knowledge production in Europe , 2009 .

[60]  Daniel A. McFarland,et al.  Ties That Last , 2013 .

[61]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  Robust Inference for Dyadic Data , 2015 .

[62]  Joon-Oh Park,et al.  The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2011 .

[63]  Rosina Moreno,et al.  What Attracts Knowledge Workers? The Role of Space and Social Networks , 2014 .

[64]  J. Christensen Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment , 2008 .

[65]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Scientific Teams and Institution Collaborations: Evidence from U.S. Universities, 1981-1999 , 2004 .

[66]  M. Wright,et al.  Funding incentives, collaborative dynamics and scientific productivity : Evidence from the EU framework program , 2009 .

[67]  A. T. Wal The dynamics of the inventor network in German biotechnology: geographic proximity versus triadic closure , 2014 .

[68]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[69]  Thomas Scherngell,et al.  Embeddedness of European Regions in European Union-Funded Research and Development (R&D) Networks: A Spatial Econometric Perspective , 2015 .

[70]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations , 2001, cond-mat/0104162.

[71]  Pablo D'Este,et al.  Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography # 11 . 06 Shaping the formation of university-industry research collaborations : what type of proximity does really matter ? , 2011 .

[72]  C. Autant‐Bernard,et al.  Social distance versus spatial distance in R & D cooperation: Empirical evidence from European collaboration choices in micro and nanotechnologies , 2007 .

[73]  Juan A. Almendral,et al.  The network of scientific collaborations within the European framework programme , 2007, 0901.3375.

[74]  A. Primi,et al.  IPRs and International Knowledge Flows: Evidence from Six Large Emerging Countries , 2015 .

[75]  F. Audrino,et al.  A General Multivariate Threshold GARCH Model With Dynamic Conditional Correlations , 2007 .

[76]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  Robust Inference with Multi-Way Clustering , 2006 .

[77]  R. Boschma,et al.  The formation of economic networks: a proximity approach , 2014 .

[78]  Silvana Tenreyro,et al.  The Log of Gravity , 2004, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[79]  Jonathan Adams Collaborations: The fourth age of research , 2013, Nature.

[80]  A. Jaffe Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[81]  Donald de B. Beaver,et al.  Reflections on Scientific Collaboration (and its study): Past, Present, and Future , 2001, Scientometrics.

[82]  Francis Narin,et al.  Scientific co-operation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers , 1991, Scientometrics.

[83]  M. Newman,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[84]  Judith R. Blau,et al.  Patterns of Communication Among Theoretical High Energy Physicists , 1974 .

[85]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations , 2004, Scientometrics.

[86]  James P. LeSage,et al.  The Role of R&D Collaboration Networks on Regional Knowledge Creation: Evidence from Information and Communication Technologies , 2018 .

[87]  A. Morrison,et al.  Proximity and scientific collaboration: Evidence from the global wine industry , 2015 .

[88]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Lone Inventors as Source of Breakthroughs: Myth or Reality? , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[89]  H. Bathelt,et al.  Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation , 2004 .