Empirically Valid Rules for Ill-Defined Domains
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Michael J. Baker,et al. Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments , 2003 .
[2] Kevin D. Ashley,et al. Comparing Argument Diagrams , 2012, JURIX.
[3] Chad S. Carr. Using Computer Supported Argument Visualization to Teach Legal Argumentation , 2003, Visualizing Argumentation.
[4] Vincent Aleven,et al. Argument graph classification with Genetic Programming and C4.5 , 2008, EDM.
[5] Vincent Aleven,et al. Adaptive Technologies for Training and Education: Adaptive Tutoring Technologies and Ill-Defined Domains , 2012 .
[6] Collin Lynch,et al. The diagnosticity of argument diagrams , 2014 .
[7] Johan Bos,et al. Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2012: The Twenty-Fifth annual conference , 2012 .
[8] Kevin D. Ashley,et al. Can Diagrams Predict Essay Grades? , 2014, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.
[9] Vincent Aleven,et al. Re-evaluating LARGO in the Classroom: Are Diagrams Better Than Text for Teaching Argumentation Skills? , 2008, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.
[10] Vincent Aleven,et al. Concepts, Structures, and Goals: Redefining Ill-Definedness , 2009, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..
[11] Antonija Mitrovic,et al. Revisiting Ill-Definedness and the Consequences for ITSs , 2009, AIED.
[12] Antonija Mitrovic,et al. Towards Individualized Dialogue Support for Ill-Defined Domains , 2009, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..
[13] Vincent Aleven,et al. Evaluating an Intelligent Tutoring System for Making Legal Arguments with Hypotheticals , 2009, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..
[14] Niels Pinkwart,et al. LASAD: Flexible representations for computer-based collaborative argumentation , 2013, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[15] D. Suthers. Representational guidance for collaborative inquiry. , 2003 .