Coronary pressure measurement and fractional flow reserve

The shortcomings of coronary arteriography to assess the physiological significance of coronary stenoses have been recognised for decades1 2; therefore, the importance of additional physiological techniques is beyond doubt. One of the currently available physiological techniques is coronary pressure measurement, which has emerged over the past few years as a major step forward in the invasive assessment of coronary artery disease.3-9This was partly owing to major technical progress in developing pressure monitoring guidewires and partly to a theoretical innovation, the concept of coronary pressure derived fractional flow reserve (FFR), which closely relates distal coronary pressure to myocardial blood flow during maximum arteriolar vasodilatation. In the catheterisation laboratory, this new approach enables an “on the spot” diagnosis as to what extent a given epicardial stenosis contributes to reversible myocardial ischaemia and the decision whether revascularisation of the stenosis is warranted. In addition, pressure derived FFR appears to be a useful index to monitor and guide coronary intervention, particularly adequate stent deployment.10 11 This review aims to provide a short overview of the theoretical and physiological background of this new approach and to focus on its clinical applicability, both for diagnostic and therapeutic catheterisation. The functional state of a patient with a coronary artery stenosis is determined by the maximum blood flow that can reach the dependent myocardium. As soon as maximum achievable blood flow, at a given level of exercise, is no longer sufficient to match oxygen demand, myocardial ischaemia and angina pectoris will occur. Therefore, fundamentally, it is maximum blood flow that should be studied to establish the physiological significance of a coronary stenosis. Fractional flow reserve is defined as maximum myocardial blood flow in the presence of a stenosis divided by the theoretical maximum flow in the absence of the stenosis—that is, maximum flow …

[1]  J. Koolen,et al.  Quantification of recruitable coronary collateral blood flow in conscious humans and its potential to predict future ischemic events. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  R. Wilson,et al.  Assessing the severity of coronary-artery stenoses. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  M. Menegus,et al.  Fractional Flow Reserve , 1997 .

[4]  J. Koolen,et al.  Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and coronary pressure measurement to assess optimum stent deployment. , 1999, Circulation.

[5]  W. Wijns,et al.  Long-term follow-up after deferral of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of intermediate stenosis on the basis of coronary pressure measurement. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  G. Heyndrickx,et al.  Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty catheters versus fluid-filled pressure monitoring guidewires for coronary pressure measurements and correlation with quantitative coronary angiography. , 1993, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  Bernard De Bruyne,et al.  Pitfalls in Coronary Pressure Measurement , 2000 .

[8]  J. Bartunek,et al.  Relation between myocardial fractional flow reserve calculated from coronary pressure measurements and exercise-induced myocardial ischemia. , 1995, Circulation.

[9]  A Bol,et al.  Coronary flow reserve calculated from pressure measurements in humans. Validation with positron emission tomography. , 1994, Circulation.

[10]  P. H. van der Voort,et al.  Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  E. Topol,et al.  Our preoccupation with coronary luminology. The dissociation between clinical and angiographic findings in ischemic heart disease. , 1995, Circulation.

[12]  W. Wijns,et al.  Simultaneous coronary pressure and flow velocity measurements in humans. Feasibility, reproducibility, and hemodynamic dependence of coronary flow velocity reserve, hyperemic flow versus pressure slope index, and fractional flow reserve. , 1996, Circulation.

[13]  P. H. van der Voort,et al.  Fractional flow reserve. A useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. , 1995, Circulation.

[14]  T. Marwick,et al.  Dobutamine-induced wall motion abnormalities: correlations with myocardial fractional flow reserve and quantitative coronary angiography. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  M. Kern,et al.  From research to clinical practice: current role of intracoronary physiologically based decision making in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  B. De Bruyne,et al.  Experimental Basis of Determining Maximum Coronary, Myocardial, and Collateral Blood Flow by Pressure Measurements for Assessing Functional Stenosis Severity Before and After Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty , 1993, Circulation.