Comparison of EPISTAR and T sub 2 *-weighted gadolinium-enhanced perfusion imaging in patients with acute cerebral ischemia

Article abstract-Purpose: To compare echo-planar imaging with signal targeting and alternating radiofrequency (EPISTAR), an arterial spin-labeling technique, to a T2 *-weighted gadolinium-enhanced (T2 *-WGE) MR perfusion technique for the evaluation of acute cerebrovascular disease. Method: Twenty-one EPISTAR and T sub 2 *-WGE perfusion studies were performed on 18 patients with the clinical diagnosis of acute stroke (12 men, 6 women, age range 34 to 89 years, mean age 68 years). For qualitative analysis, perfusion studies of both techniques were grouped into categories (hyperperfusion, normal perfusion, delayed perfusion, or absent perfusion) and compared with a Wilcoxon signed rank test. Quantitative analysis was performed using signal intensity measurements in a region of interest that was defined by diffusion-weighted imaging abnormalities. These signal intensity measurements were compared with a mirror region in the contralateral unaffected hemisphere. Signal intensity ratios (infarcted region versus the unaffected contralateral region) were calculated and compared using a paired t test. Results: Qualitative analysis demonstrated agreement between the two techniques in 17 of 21 studies (hyperfusion, n = 3 patients; normal perfusion, n = 3; delayed perfusion, n = 4; and absent perfusion, n = 7). In four studies, the two techniques disagreed when EPISTAR demonstrated absent and T2 *-WGE perfusion demonstrated delayed perfusion (p > 0.05). Quantitative analysis revealed a mean signal intensity ratio of 0.73 +/- 0.79 for the T2 *-WGE perfusion technique and 0.69 +/- 0.68 for the EPISTAR technique (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The noninvasive EPISTAR technique can assess perfusion abnormalities similarly to the T2 *-WGE perfusion technique and may provide a valuable alternative in the diagnosis of acute stroke patients. Differences between the two techniques can be explained by the applied inflow times in the EPISTAR technique. NEUROLOGY 1997;48: 673-679

[1]  Donald S. Williams,et al.  Perfusion imaging , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  L Bolinger,et al.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of human brain perfusion at 1.5 T using steady-state inversion of arterial water. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  M E Moseley,et al.  Echo-planar perfusion-sensitive MR imaging of acute cerebral ischemia. , 1993, Radiology.

[4]  R. Turner,et al.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  M E Moseley,et al.  Early detection of ischemic injury: comparison of spectroscopy, diffusion-, T2-, and magnetic susceptibility-weighted MRI in cats. , 1990, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplementum.

[6]  V. Baughman,et al.  The transcranial Doppler. , 1991, Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology.

[7]  W. J. Lorenz,et al.  Quantification of regional cerebral blood flow and volume with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging. , 1994, Radiology.

[8]  A. Nobre,et al.  Qualitative mapping of cerebral blood flow and functional localization with echo-planar MR imaging and signal targeting with alternating radio frequency. , 1994, Radiology.

[9]  R. Ladebeck,et al.  Sodium‐23 imaging of supratentorial lesions at 4.0 T , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  B. Ring.  Diagnosis of embolic occlusions of smaller branches of the intracerebral arteries. , 1966, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[11]  D. S. Williams,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of perfusion using spin inversion of arterial water. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  D. Tank,et al.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  R. S. Hinks,et al.  Time course EPI of human brain function during task activation , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  V. Grant,et al.  Modes and origins of mechanical and ethological isolation in angiosperms. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  B. Rosen,et al.  Dynamic imaging with lanthanide chelates in normal brain: Contrast due to magnetic susceptibility effects , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  R N Bryan,et al.  Diagnosis of Acute Cerebral Infarction : Comparison of CT and MR Imaging 611 , 2013 .

[17]  R R Edelman,et al.  Signal targeting with alternating radiofrequency (STAR) sequences: Application to MR angiography , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  D Chien,et al.  Perfusion imaging by nuclear magnetic resonance. , 1989, Magnetic resonance quarterly.

[19]  R. Turner,et al.  Echo‐planar time course MRI of cat brain oxygenation changes , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  Wei Li,et al.  Acute cerebral ischemia: evaluation with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and MR angiography. , 1992, Radiology.