Compressible direct numerical simulation of low-pressure turbines: part I - methodology

Modern low pressure turbines (LPT) feature high pressure ratios and moderate Mach and Reynolds numbers, increasing the possibility of laminar boundary-layer separation on the blades. Upstream disturbances including background turbulence and incoming wakes have a profound effect on the behavior of separation bubbles and the type/location of laminar-turbulent transition and therefore need to be considered in LPT design. URANS are often found inadequate to resolve the complex wake dynamics and impact of these environmental parameters on the boundary layers and may not drive the design to the best aerodynamic efficiency. LES can partly improve the accuracy, but has difficulties in predicting boundary layer transition and capturing the delay of laminar separation with varying inlet turbulence levels. Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) is able to overcome these limitations but has to date been considered too computationally expensive. Here a novel compressible DNS code is presented and validated, promising to make DNS practical for LPT studies. Also, the sensitivity of wake loss coefficient with respect to freestream turbulence levels below 1% is discussed.

[1]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[2]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Influence of Wake Structure on Unsteady Flow in a Low Pressure Turbine Blade Passage , 2009 .

[3]  Christopher K. W. Tam,et al.  A Wavenumber Based Extrapolation and Interpolation Method for Use in Conjunction with High-Order Finite Difference Schemes , 2000 .

[4]  R. E. Mayle,et al.  The 1991 IGTI Scholar Lecture: The Role of Laminar-Turbulent Transition in Gas Turbine Engines , 1991 .

[5]  Christopher A. Kennedy,et al.  Reduced aliasing formulations of the convective terms within the Navier-Stokes equations for a compressible fluid , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[6]  Torsten Hoefler,et al.  Scalable communication protocols for dynamic sparse data exchange , 2010, PPoPP '10.

[7]  J. Kim,et al.  Characteristic Interface Conditions for Multiblock High-Order Computation on Singular Structured Grid , 2003 .

[8]  Gorazd Medic,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulation of Flow in a Low-Pressure Turbine Cascade , 2012 .

[9]  Liwei Chen,et al.  Assessing the sensitivity of turbine cascade flow to inflow disturbances using direct numerical simulation , 2012 .

[10]  P. Durbin,et al.  Evidence of longitudinal vortices evolved from distorted wakes in a turbine passage , 2001, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[11]  Hermann F. Fasel,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of complete transition to turbulence via oblique breakdown at Mach 3 , 2011, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  Neil D. Sandham,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of ‘short’ laminar separation bubbles with turbulent reattachment , 2000, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  P. Moin,et al.  DIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATION: A Tool in Turbulence Research , 1998 .

[14]  J. Wissink DNS OF SEPARATING, LOW REYNOLDS NUMBER FLOW IN A TURBINE CASCADE WITH INCOMING WAKES , 2003 .

[15]  Bernd Stoffel,et al.  Experimental investigations on steady wake effects in a high-lift turbine cascade , 2004 .

[16]  W. Rodi,et al.  Analysis of DNS and LES of Flow in a Low Pressure Turbine Cascade with Incoming Wakes and Comparison with Experiments , 2002 .

[17]  Richard D. Sandberg,et al.  An axis treatment for flow equations in cylindrical coordinates based on parity conditions , 2011 .

[18]  Philippe R. Spalart,et al.  Mechanisms of transition and heat transfer in a separation bubble , 2000, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[19]  Wolfgang Rodi,et al.  Direct numerical simulation, large eddy simulation and unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier—Stokes simulations of periodic unsteady flow in a low-pressure turbine cascade: A comparison , 2003 .

[20]  N. Sandham,et al.  Direct numerical simulations of forced and unforced separation bubbles on an airfoil at incidence , 2008, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[21]  Neil D. Sandham,et al.  Large-eddy simulation of low-frequency unsteadiness in a turbulent shock-induced separation bubble , 2009 .

[22]  Mark McQuilling,et al.  Evaluation of RANS Transition Modeling for High Lift LPT Flows at Low Reynolds Number , 2013 .

[23]  Richard D. Sandberg,et al.  Nonreflecting Zonal Characteristic Boundary Condition for Direct Numerical Simulation of Aerodynamic Sound , 2006 .

[24]  P. Moin,et al.  A direct numerical simulation study on the mean velocity characteristics in turbulent pipe flow , 2008, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[25]  W. Rodi,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of flow and heat transfer in a turbine cascade with incoming wakes , 2006, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[26]  Richard D. Sandberg,et al.  DNS OF COMPRESSIBLE PIPE FLOW EXITING INTO A COFLOW , 2012, Proceeding of Seventh International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena.

[27]  C. Kato,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulation of Compressible Transitional Cascade Flows with and without Incoming Free-Stream Turbulence , 2006 .

[28]  Richard D. Sandberg,et al.  Numerical investigation of turbulent supersonic axisymmetric wakes , 2012, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[29]  L. Sirovich,et al.  Modeling a no-slip flow boundary with an external force field , 1993 .

[30]  P. Moin,et al.  Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number , 1987, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[31]  J. Fröhlich,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulation of Flow Around Low-Pressure Turbine Blade with Incoming Wakes , 2003 .

[32]  Richard D. Sandberg,et al.  DNS of a Compliant Trailing-Edge Flow , 2013 .

[33]  Tony Arts,et al.  Aerodynamic Performance of a Very High Lift Low Pressure Turbine Airfoil (T106C) at Low Reynolds and High Mach Number With Effect of Free Stream Turbulence Intensity , 2010 .

[34]  Jonathan B. Freund,et al.  Proposed Inflow/Outflow Boundary Condition for Direct Computation of Aerodynamic Sound , 1997 .

[35]  F. White Viscous Fluid Flow , 1974 .

[36]  Howard P. Hodson,et al.  Boundary Layer Development in Axial Compressors and Turbines: Part 1 of 4—Composite Picture , 1997 .

[37]  Peter Davidson,et al.  Turbulence: An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers , 2015 .

[38]  Gavin Tabor,et al.  Inlet conditions for large eddy simulation: A review , 2010 .

[39]  H. Hodson,et al.  BLADEROW INTERACTIONS, TRANSITION, AND HIGH-LIFT AEROFOILS IN LOW-PRESSURE TURBINES , 2005 .

[40]  Richard D. Sandberg,et al.  Efficient parallel computing with a compact finite difference scheme , 2011 .

[41]  S. Corrsin,et al.  The use of a contraction to improve the isotropy of grid-generated turbulence , 1966, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.