Polygenic modeling of genome-wide association studies: an application to prostate and breast cancer.

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have successfully detected and replicated associations with numerous diseases, including cancers of the prostate and breast. These findings are helping clarify the genomic basis of such diseases, but appear to explain little of disease heritability. This limitation might reflect the focus of conventional GWAS on a small set of the most statistically significant associations with disease. More information might be obtained by analyzing GWAS using a polygenic model, which allows for the possibility that thousands of genetic variants could impact disease. Furthermore, there may exist common polygenic effects between potentially related phenotypes (e.g., prostate and breast cancer). Here we present and apply a polygenic model to GWAS of prostate and breast cancer. Our results indicate that the polygenic model can explain an increasing--albeit low--amount of heritability for both of these cancers, even when excluding the most statistically significant associations. In addition, nonaggressive prostate cancer and breast cancer appear to share a common polygenic model, potentially reflecting a similar underlying biology. This supports the further development and application of polygenic models to genomic data.

[1]  P. Visscher,et al.  Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height , 2010, Nature Genetics.

[2]  J. Witte Genome-wide association studies and beyond. , 2010, Annual review of public health.

[3]  W. Tilley,et al.  Breast and prostate cancer: more similar than different , 2010, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[4]  Judy H. Cho,et al.  Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases , 2009, Nature.

[5]  P. Visscher,et al.  Common polygenic variation contributes to risk of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder , 2009, Nature.

[6]  F. Collins,et al.  Potential etiologic and functional implications of genome-wide association loci for human diseases and traits , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  John S. Witte,et al.  Prostate cancer genomics: towards a new understanding , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[8]  Peter Donnelly,et al.  Progress and challenges in genome-wide association studies in humans , 2008, Nature.

[9]  B. Maher Personal genomes: The case of the missing heritability , 2008, Nature.

[10]  M. McCarthy,et al.  Genome-wide association studies for complex traits: consensus, uncertainty and challenges , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[11]  W. Willett,et al.  Multiple loci identified in a genome-wide association study of prostate cancer , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[12]  K. Taylor,et al.  Genome-Wide Association , 2007, Diabetes.

[13]  Zhaohui S. Qin,et al.  A second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs , 2007, Nature.

[14]  W. Willett,et al.  A genome-wide association study identifies alleles in FGFR2 associated with risk of sporadic postmenopausal breast cancer , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[15]  P. Fearnhead,et al.  Genome-wide association study of prostate cancer identifies a second risk locus at 8q24 , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[16]  Martin S. Taylor,et al.  Genome-wide genetic association of complex traits in heterogeneous stock mice , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[17]  Gudmundur A. Thorisson,et al.  The International HapMap Project Web site. , 2005, Genome research.

[18]  D. Schaid,et al.  Description of the international consortium for prostate cancer genetics, and failure to replicate linkage of hereditary prostate cancer to 20q13 , 2005, The Prostate.

[19]  M. Olivier A haplotype map of the human genome. , 2003, Nature.

[20]  M. Olivier A haplotype map of the human genome , 2003, Nature.

[21]  S. Gabriel,et al.  The Structure of Haplotype Blocks in the Human Genome , 2002, Science.

[22]  M. Daly,et al.  High-resolution haplotype structure in the human genome , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[23]  Timothy B. Stockwell,et al.  The Sequence of the Human Genome , 2001, Science.

[24]  J. V. Moran,et al.  Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. , 2001, Nature.

[25]  D. Heisey,et al.  The Abuse of Power , 2001 .

[26]  J. Witte,et al.  On the relative sample size required for multiple comparisons. , 2000, Statistics in medicine.

[27]  E. Lander The New Genomics: Global Views of Biology , 1996, Science.

[28]  N Risch,et al.  The Future of Genetic Studies of Complex Human Diseases , 1996, Science.

[29]  J. Witte,et al.  Genetic dissection of complex traits , 1996, Nature Genetics.

[30]  N. Nagelkerke,et al.  A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination , 1991 .

[31]  D. Mccormick Sequence the Human Genome , 1986, Bio/Technology.

[32]  On beyond GWAS , 2010, Nature Genetics.

[33]  D. Clayton,et al.  A unified stepwise regression procedure for evaluating the relative effects of polymorphisms within a gene using case/control or family data: application to HLA in type 1 diabetes. , 2002, American journal of human genetics.

[34]  International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome , 2001, Nature.