Effect of Fluoride-Modified Titanium Surface on Early Adhesion of Irradiated Osteoblasts

Objective. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of fluoride-modified titanium surface on adhesion of irradiated osteoblasts. Materials and Methods. Fluoride-modified surface was obtained and the morphology, roughness, and chemical composition of the surface were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, respectively. The adhesion of irradiated osteoblast-like cells, in terms of number, area, and fluorescence intensity on the titanium surface, was evaluated using immunofluorescence staining. Results. Numerous nanosize pits were seen only in the F-TiO surface. The pits were more remarkable and uniform on F-TiO surface than on TiO surface; however, the amplitude of peaks and bottoms on F-TiO surface appeared to be smaller than on TiO surface. The Sa value and Sdr percentage of TiO surfaces were significantly higher than those of F-TiO surface. The concentrations of main elements such as titanium, oxygen, and carbon were similar on both surfaces. The number of irradiated osteoblasts adhered on the control surface was larger than on fluoride-modified surface. Meanwhile, the cells on the fluoride-modified surface formed more actin filaments. Conclusions. The fluoride-modified titanium surface alters the adhesion of irradiated osteoblasts. Further studies are needed to investigate the proliferation, differentiation, maturation, gene expression, and cytokine production of irradiated osteoblasts on fluoride-modified titanium surface.

[1]  J. Granjeiro,et al.  Short-term response of human osteoblast-like cells on titanium surfaces with micro- and nano-sized features. , 2012, Scanning.

[2]  M. Monjo,et al.  In Vitro Osteogenic Properties of Two Dental Implant Surfaces , 2012, International journal of biomaterials.

[3]  C. Galli,et al.  Actin cytoskeleton controls activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in mesenchymal cells on implant surfaces with different topographies. , 2012, Acta biomaterialia.

[4]  C. Lim,et al.  Estradiol influences the mechanical properties of human fetal osteoblasts through cytoskeletal changes. , 2012, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[5]  H. Steveling,et al.  Early and immediate loading of titanium implants with fluoride-modified surfaces: results of 5-year prospective study. , 2011, Clinical oral implants research.

[6]  N. Vilaboa,et al.  In search of representative models of human bone-forming cells for cytocompatibility studies. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[7]  J. Miyakoshi,et al.  Ionising irradiation-induced inhibition of differentiation of C3H10T1/2 cells to the osteoblastic lineage , 2011, International journal of radiation biology.

[8]  R. Rullo,et al.  Biological response of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells to fluoride-modified titanium surfaces. , 2010, Clinical oral implants research.

[9]  Andrew Burgess,et al.  Loss of human Greatwall results in G2 arrest and multiple mitotic defects due to deregulation of the cyclin B-Cdc2/PP2A balance , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  O. Gavet,et al.  Progressive activation of CyclinB1-Cdk1 coordinates entry to mitosis. , 2010, Developmental cell.

[11]  M. Monjo,et al.  Controlled electro-implementation of fluoride in titanium implant surfaces enhances cortical bone formation and mineralization. , 2010, Acta biomaterialia.

[12]  B. Chrcanovic,et al.  Osteoradionecrosis of the jaws—a current overview—part 1 , 2010, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

[13]  M. Tabrizian,et al.  Titanium crystal orientation as a tool for the improved and regulated cell attachment. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[14]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  XPS, AES and SEM analysis of recent dental implants. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[15]  M. Monjo,et al.  In vivo expression of osteogenic markers and bone mineral density at the surface of fluoride-modified titanium implants. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[16]  H. Kim,et al.  Biomimetic approach to dental implants. , 2008, Current pharmaceutical design.

[17]  Yunzhi Yang,et al.  The effect of titanium surface roughening on protein absorption, cell attachment, and cell spreading. , 2008, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[18]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  The effect of chemical and nanotopographical modifications on the early stages of osseointegration. , 2008, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[19]  M. Edirisinghe,et al.  Influence of nanohydroxyapatite patterns deposited by electrohydrodynamic spraying on osteoblast response. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[20]  K. Bormann,et al.  Dose inhomogeneities on surfaces of different dental implants during irradiation with high-energy photons. , 2008, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[21]  I. Abrahamsson,et al.  Healing at fluoride-modified implants placed in wide marginal defects: an experimental study in dogs. , 2008, Clinical oral implants research.

[22]  P. Trevilatto,et al.  Failing Factors Associated With Osseointegrated Dental Implant Loss , 2007, Implant dentistry.

[23]  L. Cooper,et al.  The effect of hydrofluoric acid treatment of TiO2 grit blasted titanium implants on adherent osteoblast gene expression in vitro and in vivo. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[24]  P. Layrolle,et al.  Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. , 2007, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[25]  D. Kwong,et al.  The effects of various irradiation doses on the growth and differentiation of marrow‐derived human mesenchymal stromal cells , 2007, Pediatric transplantation.

[26]  J. Lindhe,et al.  Bone healing at implants with a fluoride-modified surface: an experimental study in dogs. , 2007, Clinical oral implants research.

[27]  A. Holmen,et al.  Fluoride modification effects on osteoblast behavior and bone formation at TiO2 grit-blasted c.p. titanium endosseous implants. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[28]  D. Seabold,et al.  Effects of implant surface microtopography on osteoblast gene expression. , 2005, Clinical oral implants research.

[29]  G. Gronowicz,et al.  Integrin-mediated signaling in osteoblasts on titanium implant materials. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[30]  T Albrektsson,et al.  Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces. , 2000, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[31]  D. B. Evans,et al.  PCR phenotyping of cytokines, growth factors and their receptors and bone matrix proteins in human osteoblast-like cell lines. , 1996, Bone.

[32]  H. Gruber,et al.  The effects of fluoride on bone. , 1991, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[33]  R. Marx.  Osteoradionecrosis: a new concept of its pathophysiology. , 1983, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[34]  Wei Ma,et al.  Effects of irradiation on osteoblast-like cells on different titanium surfaces in vitro. , 2013, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[35]  W. Marsden.  I and J , 2012 .

[36]  V. Konstantinovic,et al.  Effects of radiation therapy on craniofacial and dental implants: a review of the literature. , 2009, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[37]  Shigeru Kobayashi,et al.  The initial attachment and subsequent behavior of osteoblastic cells and oral epithelial cells on titanium. , 2004, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[38]  C. Adams,et al.  Ionizing radiation sensitizes bone cells to apoptosis. , 2004, Bone.