Superstar Cities

Differences in house price and income growth rates between 1950 and 2000 across metropolitan areas have led to an ever-widening gap in housing values and incomes between the typical and highest-priced locations. We show that the growing spatial skewness in house prices and incomes are related and can be explained, at least in part, by inelastic supply of land in some attractive locations combined with an increasing number of high-income households nationally. Scarce land leads to a bidding-up of land prices and a sorting of high-income families relatively more into those desirable, unique, low housing construction markets, which we label "superstar cities." Continued growth in the number of high-income families in the U.S. provides support for ever-larger differences in house prices across inelastically supplied locations and income-based spatial sorting. Our empirical work confirms a number of equilibrium relationships implied by the superstar cities framework and shows that it occurs both at the metropolitan area level and at the sub-MSA level, controlling for MSA characteristics.

[1]  Joel Waldfogel,et al.  Preference Externalities: An Empirical Study of Who Benefits Whom in Differentiated Product Markets , 1999 .

[2]  E. Moretti.  Real Wage Inequality , 2008, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[3]  Joseph S. Tracy,et al.  The Structure of Local Public Finance and the Quality of Life , 1991, Journal of Political Economy.

[4]  E. Glaeser,et al.  The Rise of the Sunbelt , 2007 .

[5]  S. Rosenthal,et al.  The Determinants of Agglomeration , 2001 .

[6]  Emmanuel Saez,et al.  Income inequality in the United States , 2003 .

[7]  Andrei Shleifer,et al.  Economic Growth in a Cross-Section of Cities , 1995 .

[8]  Lawrence F. Katz,et al.  The Polarization of the U.S. Labor Market , 2006 .

[9]  R. Meese,et al.  Testing the Present Value Relation for Housing Prices: Should I Leave My House in San Francisco? , 1994 .

[10]  Sven Rady,et al.  Heterogeneity within Communities: A Stochastic Model with Tenure Choice , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[11]  James E. Rauch,et al.  Productivity Gains from Geographic Concentration of Human Capital: Evidence from the Cities , 1991 .

[12]  Dennis Epple,et al.  Estimating Equilibrium Models of Local Jurisdictions , 1998, Journal of Political Economy.

[13]  G. Blomquist,et al.  New Estimates of Quality of Life in Urban Areas , 1988 .

[14]  Albert Saiz,et al.  Construction Costs and the Supply of Housing Structure , 2006 .

[15]  J. Roback.  Wages, Rents, and the Quality of Life , 1982, Journal of Political Economy.

[16]  S. Rosen.  The Economics of Superstars , 1981 .

[17]  E. Moretti.  Workers' Education, Spillovers, and Productivity: Evidence from Plant-Level Production Functions , 2004 .

[18]  E. Moretti.  Human Capital Externalities in Cities , 2003 .

[19]  Emmanuel Saez,et al.  Income inequality in the United States , 2003 .

[20]  E. Glaeser,et al.  Growth in Cities , 1991, Journal of Political Economy.

[21]  Jesse M. Shapiro.  Smart Cities: Quality of Life, Productivity, and the Growth Effects of Human Capital , 2005, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[22]  Ari Kuncoro,et al.  Industrial Development in Cities , 1992, Journal of Political Economy.

[23]  Anita A. Summers,et al.  A New Measure of the Local Regulatory Environment for Housing Markets: Wharton Residential Land Use Regulatory Index , 2006 .

[24]  Dennis Epple,et al.  Equilibrium and Local Redistribution in an Urban Economy when Households Differ in both Preferences and Incomes , 1998 .

[25]  F. Ortalo-Magné,et al.  The Political Economy of Housing Supply , 2005 .

[26]  Pierre-Olivier Weill,et al.  Why Has House Price Dispersion Gone Up? , 2006 .