Distinct rich and diverse clubs regulate coarse and fine binocular disparity processing: Evidence from stereoscopic task-based fMRI

While cortical regions involved in processing binocular disparities have been studied extensively, little is known on how the human visual system adapts to changing disparity magnitudes. Even though there is an established correlation of BOLD signal with disparity magnitudes, this correlation is not inherent and instead arises from specific causal interactions within an integrated network. Here, we investigate causal mechanisms of coarse and fine binocular disparity processing using fMRI with a clinically validated, custom anaglyph-based stimulus. Therefore, we use degree (D) and participation coefficient (PC) metrics representing rich and diverse properties of the brain network, respectively. Twenty-six healthy participants were asked to indicate hidden 3D shapes through anaglyph filters at four disparity magnitudes. Our findings reveal significant changes at different disparity magnitudes in terms of D and PC of Middle Temporal (MT), V2, V3 and Superior Parietal Lobule (SPL) across both hemispheres. Of these, MT exhibited overlapping rich and diverse club characteristics among other brain regions. Further, diverse clubs outperform rich clubs in decoding disparity magnitudes irrespective of the hemisphere, thereby reinforcing their integrative network properties. These findings imply that distinct rich and diverse clubs exist and provide functional evidence for the variability in human stereopsis.

[1]  R. Saxena,et al.  Digital Stereo Test (DST): Static stereopsis assessment in simulated and real depth-deficit patients , 2023, Journal of Vision.

[2]  D. Levi Applications and implications for extended reality to improve binocular vision and stereopsis , 2023, Journal of vision.

[3]  D. Levi Learning to see in depth , 2022, Vision Research.

[4]  Q. Gong,et al.  Abnormal effective connectivity in visual cortices underlies stereopsis defects in amblyopia , 2022, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[5]  Toshihide W. Yoshioka,et al.  Specialized contributions of mid-tier stages of dorsal and ventral pathways to stereoscopic processing in macaque , 2021, eLife.

[6]  R. Saxena,et al.  Effect of induced anisometropia on stereopsis and surgical tasks in a simulated environment , 2021, Indian journal of ophthalmology.

[7]  Holly Bridge,et al.  A low-cost telescope for enhanced stimulus visual field coverage in functional MRI , 2020, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[8]  Jiu Chen,et al.  Disrupted Patterns of Rich-Club and Diverse-Club Organizations in Subjective Cognitive Decline and Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment , 2020, Frontiers in Neuroscience.

[9]  Nihong Chen,et al.  Functional specialization in human dorsal pathway for stereoscopic depth processing , 2020, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  Bruce Wainman,et al.  The Critical Role of Stereopsis in Virtual and Mixed Reality Learning Environments , 2020, Anatomical sciences education.

[11]  Simone Kühn,et al.  Stereoscopic Rendering via Goggles Elicits Higher Functional Connectivity During Virtual Reality Gaming , 2019, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[12]  Jiacai Zhang,et al.  Decoding disparity categories in 3-dimensional images from fMRI data using functional connectivity patterns , 2019, Cognitive Neurodynamics.

[13]  Beiji Zou,et al.  Altered Spontaneous Brain Activity of Children with Unilateral Amblyopia: A Resting State fMRI Study , 2019, Neural plasticity.

[14]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  FMRIPrep: a robust preprocessing pipeline for functional MRI , 2018, Nature Methods.

[15]  Shuntaro C. Aoki,et al.  Microstructural properties of the vertical occipital fasciculus explain the variability in human stereoacuity , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  R. Matthew Hutchison,et al.  Functional coupling between frontoparietal and occipitotemporal pathways during action and perception , 2018, Cortex.

[17]  A. Shmuel,et al.  Partial correlation analysis reveals abnormal retinotopically organized functional connectivity of visual areas in amblyopia , 2017, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[18]  J. Friedman,et al.  Construction of Trees from a Learning Sample , 2017 .

[19]  Maxwell A. Bertolero,et al.  The diverse club , 2017, Nature Communications.

[20]  Jessica R. Cohen,et al.  The Segregation and Integration of Distinct Brain Networks and Their Relationship to Cognition , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Fei Wang,et al.  Brain activation difference evoked by different binocular disparities of stereograms: An fMRI study. , 2016, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[22]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex , 2016, Nature.

[23]  Kristine Krug,et al.  Neural architectures for stereo vision , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  Aidan P. Murphy,et al.  Lesions to right posterior parietal cortex impair visual depth perception from disparity but not motion cues , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  H. Bridge Effects of cortical damage on binocular depth perception , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  David C. Knill,et al.  Stereopsis and amblyopia: A mini-review , 2015, Vision Research.

[27]  A. Darzi,et al.  The role of the posterior parietal cortex in stereopsis and hand-eye coordination during motor task behaviours , 2015, Cognitive Processing.

[28]  Bevil R. Conway,et al.  Functional Architecture for Disparity in Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex and Its Relationship to the Architecture for Faces, Color, Scenes, and Visual Field , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Denis Schluppeck,et al.  7 Tesla fMRI Reveals Systematic Functional Organization for Binocular Disparity in Dorsal Visual Cortex , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  J. Read,et al.  Stereo vision and strabismus , 2015, Eye.

[31]  M. P. van den Heuvel,et al.  Rich Club Organization and Intermodule Communication in the Cat Connectome , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  Cedric E. Ginestet,et al.  Cognitive relevance of the community structure of the human brain functional coactivation network , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysing connectivity with Granger causality and dynamic causal modelling , 2013, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[34]  H. Goltz,et al.  Effects of induced monocular blur versus anisometropic amblyopia on saccades, reaching, and eye-hand coordination. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[35]  Yury Shtyrov,et al.  Fast reconfiguration of high-frequency brain networks in response to surprising changes in auditory input. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  Patrick J. Wolfe,et al.  Null models for network data , 2012, ArXiv.

[37]  A. Parker,et al.  Neurons in Dorsal Visual Area V5/MT Signal Relative Disparity , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Moriah E. Thomason,et al.  Vector autoregression, structural equation modeling, and their synthesis in neuroimaging data analysis , 2011, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[39]  O. Sporns,et al.  Rich-Club Organization of the Human Connectome , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  Nipype: A Flexible, Lightweight and Extensible Neuroimaging Data Processing Framework in Python , 2011, Front. Neuroinform..

[41]  Mariko Osaka,et al.  Anterior Medial Prefrontal Cortex Exhibits Activation during Task Preparation but Deactivation during Task Execution , 2011, PloS one.

[42]  Jong H. Yoon,et al.  General and Specific Functional Connectivity Disturbances in First-Episode Schizophrenia During Cognitive Control Performance , 2011, Biological Psychiatry.

[43]  Manfred G Kitzbichler,et al.  Cognitive Effort Drives Workspace Configuration of Human Brain Functional Networks , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  D. Melmoth,et al.  Eye-hand coordination skills in children with and without amblyopia. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[45]  Justin M. Ales,et al.  Disparity-Tuned Population Responses from Human Visual Cortex , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[47]  A. Parker,et al.  Neural modulation by binocular disparity greatest in human dorsal visual stream. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[48]  R. Vogels,et al.  Contribution of Inferior Temporal and Posterior Parietal Activity to Three-Dimensional Shape Perception , 2010, Current Biology.

[49]  Jingyun Wang,et al.  Stereoacuity Outcomes After Treatment of Infantile and Accommodative Esotropia , 2009, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[50]  Mark J Lowe,et al.  Comparison of unilateral and bilateral complex finger tapping‐related activation in premotor and primary motor cortex , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[51]  Svetlana S. Georgieva,et al.  The Processing of Three-Dimensional Shape from Disparity in the Human Brain , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  Z. Kourtzi,et al.  Multivoxel Pattern Selectivity for Perceptually Relevant Binocular Disparities in the Human Brain , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[53]  Holly Bridge,et al.  Topographical representation of binocular depth in the human visual cortex using fMRI. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[54]  Gregory C DeAngelis,et al.  Disparity Channels in Early Vision , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[55]  Simon Grant,et al.  Prehension deficits in amblyopia. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[56]  G. DeAngelis,et al.  Linking Neural Representation to Function in Stereoscopic Depth Perception: Roles of the Middle Temporal Area in Coarse versus Fine Disparity Discrimination , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[57]  Ichiro Fujita,et al.  Neural Correlates of Fine Depth Discrimination in Monkey Inferior Temporal Cortex , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[58]  J. Wood,et al.  Amblyopia: prevalence, natural history, functional effects and treatment , 2005, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[59]  Barry Horwitz,et al.  Investigating the neural basis for functional and effective connectivity. Application to fMRI , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[60]  David J Heeger,et al.  Stereoscopic processing of absolute and relative disparity in human visual cortex. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[61]  Mark W Greenlee,et al.  BOLD response in dorsal areas varies with relative disparity level , 2004, Neuroreport.

[62]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Stereopsis Activates V3A and Caudal Intraparietal Areas in Macaques and Humans , 2003, Neuron.

[63]  A. Nieder Stereoscopic Vision: Solving the Correspondence Problem , 2003, Current Biology.

[64]  G. Orban,et al.  At Least at the Level of Inferior Temporal Cortex, the Stereo Correspondence Problem Is Solved , 2003, Neuron.

[65]  M. Brass,et al.  The role of the frontal cortex in task preparation. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[66]  Ryuta Ito,et al.  Common neural processing regions for dynamic and static stereopsis in human parieto-occipital cortices , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[67]  A. Parker,et al.  A specialization for relative disparity in V2 , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[68]  G. Orban,et al.  Macaque Inferior Temporal Neurons Are Selective for Three-Dimensional Boundaries and Surfaces , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[69]  Z. Pizlo Perception viewed as an inverse problem , 2001, Vision Research.

[70]  David J. Fleet,et al.  Human cortical activity correlates with stereoscopic depth perception. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[71]  J. Sjöstrand,et al.  Screening merits of the Lang II, Frisby, Randot, Titmus, and TNO stereo tests. , 2001, Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

[72]  K Kani,et al.  Stereopsis-processing regions in the human parieto-occipital cortex , 2001, Neuroreport.

[73]  G. Shulman,et al.  Medial prefrontal cortex and self-referential mental activity: Relation to a default mode of brain function , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[74]  G. Orban,et al.  Three-Dimensional Shape Coding in Inferior Temporal Cortex , 2000, Neuron.

[75]  E. Birch,et al.  Factors influencing stereoacuity in accommodative esotropia. , 2000, Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

[76]  D. Stager,et al.  Why does early surgical alignment improve stereoacuity outcomes in infantile esotropia? , 2000, Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

[77]  T Nakada,et al.  Perceptual processing of stereopsis in humans: high-field (3.0-tesla) functional MRI study. , 1999, Neurology.

[78]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Multisubject fMRI Studies and Conjunction Analyses , 1999, NeuroImage.

[79]  R Perez,et al.  Neural mechanisms underlying stereoscopic vision , 1998, Progress in Neurobiology.

[80]  D. Stager,et al.  Random dot stereoacuity following surgical correction of infantile esotropia. , 1995, Journal of pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus.

[81]  H. Komatsu,et al.  Disparity sensitivity of neurons in monkey extrastriate area MST , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[82]  Alan Cowey,et al.  The role of the corpus callosum and extra striate visual areas in stereoacuity in Macaque monkeys , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[83]  G. Poggio,et al.  Stereoscopic mechanisms in monkey visual cortex: binocular correlation and disparity selectivity , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[84]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Computational vision and regularization theory , 1985, Nature.

[85]  K Simons,et al.  A comparison of the Frisby, Random-Dot E, TNO, and Randot circles stereotests in screening and office use. , 1981, Archives of ophthalmology.

[86]  A. Cowey,et al.  Brain damage and global stereopsis , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[87]  A. Carmon,et al.  Dominance of the right cerebral hemisphere for stereopsis , 1969 .

[88]  Marisa O. Hollinshead,et al.  The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity , 2011 .

[89]  S Elliott,et al.  Interventions for infantile esotropia. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.