A refined, efficient mean solvation force model that includes the interior volume contribution.

A refined implicit aqueous solvation model is proposed for the simulation of biomolecules without the explicit inclusion of the solvent degrees of freedom. The mean force due to solvation is approximated by the derivative of a simple analytic function of the solvent accessible surface area combined with two atomic solvation parameters, as described previously, with the addition of a novel term to account for the interaction of the interior atoms of the solute with the solvent. The extended model is parametrized by comparing the structural properties and energies computed from simulations of six test proteins of varying sizes and shapes using the new solvation energy term with the corresponding values obtained from simulations in vacuum, using the original implicit solvent model and in explicit water, and from the X-ray or NMR model structures. The mean solvation model proposed here improves the structural properties relative to vacuum simulations and relative to the simpler model that neglects the volume contribution, while remaining significantly more efficient than simulations in explicit water.

[1]  H. Scheraga,et al.  Accessible surface areas as a measure of the thermodynamic parameters of hydration of peptides. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Jacopo Tomasi,et al.  Evaluation of the dispersion contribution to the solvation energy. A simple computational model in the continuum approximation , 1989 .

[3]  W F van Gunsteren,et al.  Molecular mechanics in biology: from structure to function, taking account of solvation. , 1994, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[4]  B Montgomery Pettitt,et al.  On the mechanism of hydrophobic association of nanoscopic solutes. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[5]  Nathan A. Baker,et al.  Assessing implicit models for nonpolar mean solvation forces: the importance of dispersion and volume terms. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Thomas M Truskett,et al.  Hydrophobic hydration from small to large lengthscales: Understanding and manipulating the crossover. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  D Chandler,et al.  Temperature and length scale dependence of hydrophobic effects and their possible implications for protein folding. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Gerhard Hummer,et al.  New perspectives on hydrophobic effects , 2000 .

[9]  W. C. Still,et al.  Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecular mechanics and dynamics , 1990 .

[10]  M. Karplus,et al.  Effective energy function for proteins in solution , 1999, Proteins.

[11]  R. Levy,et al.  Enthalpy−Entropy and Cavity Decomposition of Alkane Hydration Free Energies: Numerical Results and Implications for Theories of Hydrophobic Solvation , 2000 .

[12]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.

[13]  Markus Christen,et al.  The GROMOS software for biomolecular simulation: GROMOS05 , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[14]  X. Daura,et al.  Peptide folding simulations: no solvent required? , 1999 .

[15]  B. Roux,et al.  Implicit solvent models. , 1999, Biophysical chemistry.

[16]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Atomic solvation parameters applied to molecular dynamics of proteins in solution , 1992, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[17]  Charles A Laughton,et al.  Strong solute-solute dispersive interactions in a protein-ligand complex. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[18]  Franca Fraternali,et al.  Parameter optimized surfaces (POPS): analysis of key interactions and conformational changes in the ribosome , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..

[19]  Harold A. Scheraga,et al.  Free energies of hydration of solute molecules. 1. Improvement of the hydration shell model by exact computations of overlapping volumes , 1987 .

[20]  Wilfred F. van Gunsteren,et al.  An improved GROMOS96 force field for aliphatic hydrocarbons in the condensed phase , 2001, J. Comput. Chem..

[21]  R M Stroud,et al.  Inclusion of solvation free energy with molecular mechanics energy: Alanyl dipeptide as a test case , 1992, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[22]  Ronald M. Levy,et al.  AGBNP: An analytic implicit solvent model suitable for molecular dynamics simulations and high‐resolution modeling , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[23]  C. Sander,et al.  An effective solvation term based on atomic occupancies for use in protein simulations , 1993 .

[24]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  Rapid Estimation of Solvation Energy for Simulations of Protein-Protein Association. , 2005, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[25]  J. Janin,et al.  Analytical approximation to the accessible surface area of proteins. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  W. C. Still,et al.  A rapid approximation to the solvent accessible surface areas of atoms , 1988 .

[27]  Thomas Simonson,et al.  Computational sidechain placement and protein mutagenesis with implicit solvent models , 2007, Proteins.

[28]  W. V. van Gunsteren,et al.  An efficient mean solvation force model for use in molecular dynamics simulations of proteins in aqueous solution. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  Harold A. Scheraga,et al.  Free energies of hydration of solute molecules. IV: Revised treatment of the hydration shell model , 1988 .

[30]  J A McCammon,et al.  Coupling nonpolar and polar solvation free energies in implicit solvent models. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[31]  J. Tomasi,et al.  Dispersion and repulsion contributions to the solvation energy: Refinements to a simple computational model in the continuum approximation , 1991 .

[32]  C. Chothia,et al.  Hydrophobic bonding and accessible surface area in proteins , 1974, Nature.

[33]  B Honig,et al.  Reconciling the magnitude of the microscopic and macroscopic hydrophobic effects. , 1991, Science.

[34]  Wilfred F. van Gunsteren,et al.  The importance of solute-solvent van der Waals interactions with interior atoms of biopolymers. , 2001 .

[35]  Martin Zacharias,et al.  Continuum Solvent Modeling of Nonpolar Solvation: Improvement by Separating Surface Area Dependent Cavity and Dispersion Contributions , 2003 .

[36]  H. Scheraga,et al.  Empirical solvation models can be used to differentiate native from near‐native conformations of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor , 1991, Proteins.

[37]  Charles L Brooks,et al.  Recent advances in implicit solvent-based methods for biomolecular simulations. , 2008, Current opinion in structural biology.

[38]  Chris Oostenbrink,et al.  A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: The GROMOS force‐field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6 , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[39]  A. D. McLachlan,et al.  Solvation energy in protein folding and binding , 1986, Nature.

[40]  C. Brooks,et al.  Recent advances in the development and application of implicit solvent models in biomolecule simulations. , 2004, Current opinion in structural biology.

[41]  J. Apostolakis,et al.  Evaluation of a fast implicit solvent model for molecular dynamics simulations , 2002, Proteins.

[42]  D. Chandler,et al.  Hydrophobicity at Small and Large Length Scales , 1999 .