SIQ288: A saliency dataset for image quality research

Saliency modelling for image quality research has been an active topic in multimedia over the last five years. Saliency aspects have been added to many image quality metrics (IQMs) to improve their performance in predicting perceived quality. However, challenges to optimising the performance of saliency-based IQMs remain. To make further progress, a better understanding of human attention deployment in relation to image quality through eye-tracking experimentation is indispensable. Collecting substantial eye-tracking data is often confronted with a bias due to the involvement of massive stimulus repetition that typically occurs in an image quality study. To mitigate this problem, we proposed a new experimental methodology with dedicated control mechanisms, which allows collecting more reliable eye-tracking data. We recorded 5760 trials of eye movements from 160 human observers. Our dataset consists of 288 images representing a large degree of variability in terms of scene content, distortion type as well as degradation level. We illustrate how saliency is affected by the variations of image quality. We also compare state of the art saliency models in terms of predicting where people look in both original and distorted scenes. Our dataset helps investigate the actual role saliency plays in judging image quality, and provides a benchmark for gauging saliency models in the context of image quality.

[1]  Abdelhakim Saadane,et al.  Blind Quality Metric using a Perceptual Importance Map for JPEG-20000 Compressed Images , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Image Processing.

[2]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Studying the added value of computational saliency in objective image quality assessment , 2014, 2014 IEEE Visual Communications and Image Processing Conference.

[3]  Ulrich Engelke,et al.  Visual Attention in Quality Assessment , 2011, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[4]  David Zhang,et al.  FSIM: A Feature Similarity Index for Image Quality Assessment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[5]  Frédo Durand,et al.  A Benchmark of Computational Models of Saliency to Predict Human Fixations , 2012 .

[6]  Sugato Chakravarty,et al.  Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures , 1995 .

[7]  Alexander Toet,et al.  Computational versus Psychophysical Bottom-Up Image Saliency: A Comparative Evaluation Study , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[8]  Glen P. Abousleman,et al.  A no-reference perceptual image sharpness metric based on saliency-weighted foveal pooling , 2008, 2008 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[9]  Wei Zhang,et al.  The quest for the integration of visual saliency models in objective image quality assessment: A distraction power compensated combination strategy , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[10]  Judith Redi,et al.  Interactions of visual attention and quality perception , 2011, Electronic Imaging.

[11]  Eric C. Larson,et al.  Most apparent distortion: full-reference image quality assessment and the role of strategy , 2010, J. Electronic Imaging.

[12]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Objective Image Quality Assessment: Facing The Real-World Challenges , 2016, IQSP.

[13]  Eric C. Larson,et al.  Can visual fixation patterns improve image fidelity assessment? , 2008, 2008 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[14]  Eric C. Larson,et al.  Unveiling relationships between regions of interest and image fidelity metrics , 2008, Electronic Imaging.

[15]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Image information and visual quality , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[16]  Claudio M. Privitera,et al.  Algorithms for Defining Visual Regions-of-Interest: Comparison with Eye Fixations , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[17]  Xiongkuo Min,et al.  Influence of compression artifacts on visual attention , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME).

[18]  E.C.L. Vu,et al.  Visual Fixation Patterns when Judging Image Quality: Effects of Distortion Type, Amount, and Subject Experience , 2008, 2008 IEEE Southwest Symposium on Image Analysis and Interpretation.

[19]  Liming Zhang,et al.  Image quality assessment with visual attention , 2008, 2008 19th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[20]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[21]  Ali Borji,et al.  State-of-the-Art in Visual Attention Modeling , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[22]  Ali Borji,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Human-Model Agreement in Visual Saliency Modeling: A Comparative Study , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[23]  Ingrid Heynderickx,et al.  How Does Image Content Affect the Added Value of Visual Attention in Objective Image Quality Assessment? , 2013, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[24]  Nicolas Riche,et al.  Saliency and Human Fixations: State-of-the-Art and Study of Comparison Metrics , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[25]  Patrick Le Callet,et al.  Does where you Gaze on an Image Affect your Perception of Quality? Applying Visual Attention to Image Quality Metric , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[26]  Ingrid Heynderickx,et al.  Visual Attention in Objective Image Quality Assessment: Based on Eye-Tracking Data , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[27]  Tao Liu,et al.  Saliency based objective quality assessment of decoded video affected by packet losses , 2008, 2008 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[28]  A. Greenwald Within-subjects designs: To use or not to use? , 1976 .

[29]  L. Pratap Reddy,et al.  Image Quality Assessment Complemented with Visual Regions of Interest , 2007, 2007 International Conference on Computing: Theory and Applications (ICCTA'07).

[30]  Ingrid Heynderickx,et al.  Comparative Study of Fixation Density Maps , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[31]  G. Keren,et al.  Between- or Within-Subjects Design: A Methodological Dilemma , 1993 .

[32]  Wei Zhang,et al.  The Application of Visual Saliency Models in Objective Image Quality Assessment: A Statistical Evaluation , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.